Peritoneal Dialysis Pilot Study: Evaluating Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for Constipation

August 19, 2024 updated by: Nova Scotia Health Authority

An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Based Bowel Protocol for the Management of Constipation in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Study

Constipation is a common condition, which occurs one in four Canadians. Maintaining regular bowel movements is imperative because constipation can affect the quality of PD dialysate flow and result in an unwanted effect on the dialysis adequacy.

There is limited data on how to best manage constipation in the peritoneal dialysis population. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is an osmotic laxative that is becoming popular for prevention and treatment of constipation across Canada. Although some PD programs in Canada have already converted to PEG for management of constipation, more research in this population would help guide practice. For now, the current PD bowel regimen at the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) includes daily preventative therapy using a stimulant laxative, senna, along with an osmotic laxative, lactulose, for acute constipation.

The investigators will review all patients in the NSHA PD program who have regular or recent laxative use for participation in this study. Patients included in this study will be randomly assigned to the Current Bowel Protocol or the PEG Bowel Protocol for 8 weeks.

The goal is to determine if the PEG Bowel Protocol is as effective and safe for the prevention of constipation as the Current Bowel Protocol used in the PD Program. The investigators will use bowel function diaries and patient surveys to determine efficacy and safety outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Constipation is a common condition, which impacts one in four Canadians Maintaining regular bowel movements is important in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) population because constipation can negatively impact the quality of dialysate flow and can result in impaired dialysis adequacy. Unfortunately, treating constipation is challenging in PD patients because of the diet and fluid restrictions required in this population, as well as the need for constipating calcium based phosphate binders.

Constipation treatment can be administered orally or rectally. Although patients often prefer oral therapy, there are occasions when rectal therapy is preferred (ie. rectal suppositories and enemas). Oral laxatives include bulk, osmotic, stimulant, and lubricants.

In the Nova Scotia (NS) PD Program, patients are counseled to maintain a type 3-4 stool on the Bristol Stool Chart (BSC). An ideal stool is a type 4, which appears like a sausage or snake and is smooth and soft in consistency. To maintain a type 3-4 stool, current therapy includes senna 8.6-17.2 g twice daily with the addition of lactulose 30-60 mL twice daily, as needed. Rescue therapy in the Current Bowel Protocol is lactulose 30-60 mL every hour until bowel movement.

There is limited evidence to guide the ideal bowel regimen in PD patients. Reasons to consider PEG therapy include the evidence promoting PEG in the general population with constipation, the positive outcomes found in a small population of PD patients (Mimidis 2005), as well as positive feedback from other provinces who currently recommend PEG in PD patients. The investigators postulate the PEG protocol would be as effective and safe as the Current Bowel Protocol, and thus will evaluate PEG in the PD population, the investigators will conduct a prospective, interventional, randomized, open label, pilot study.

All patients with recent laxative use will be approached for inclusion. Patients will be randomly assigned to the Current Bowel Protocol (senna/lactulose) or the PEG Bowel Protocol (PEG/lactulose) for 8 weeks.

The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the PEG Bowel Protocol in preventing constipation to the Current Bowel Protocol. We will review the safety of the regimens by monitoring for adverse events from all laxatives and explore the impact of constipation in patients who experience PD treatment failure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jo-Anne Wilson, PharmD

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
        • Queen Elizabeth Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients in the peritoneal dialysis program in Nova Scotia who are currently taking laxatives.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or intolerance to any of the study laxatives (PEG, senna, lactulose); cognitive impairment or inability to document symptoms; known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or ileus; known or planned pregnancy; no laxative use in the last 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Current Bowel Protocol
Patients will receive the Current Bowel Protocol with senna. Lactulose will be used for rescue therapy.
Drug: Current Bowel Protocol (senna/lactulose)
Stimulant and Osmotic Laxatives.
Other Names:
  • Lactulose
  • Senna
  • Sennosides
  • DIN 02242814
  • DIN: 02412268
  • NPN: 00367729
  • NPN: 00026158
Active Comparator: PEG Bowel Protocol
Patients will receive the Protocol with Polyethylene Glycol 3350. Lactulose will be used for rescue therapy.
Drug: PEG Bowel Protocol (PEG/lactulose)
Osmotic Laxatives.
Other Names:
  • PEG
  • Lactulose
  • DIN 02242814
  • DIN: 02412268
  • Lax-A-Day
  • Pegalax
  • DIN: 02328232
  • Restoralax
  • DIN: 02318164
  • DIN: 02317680

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of constipation treatment success
Time Frame: 8 weeks.
Successful treatment of constipation will be defined based on a modified ROME criteria developed by Dipalma 2007: relief of constipation for more than 50% of the weeks in the study.
8 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with laxative related adverse effects.
Time Frame: 8 weeks.
Compare the occurrence of side effects during the study period.
8 weeks.
Mean change from baseline on the PAC-SYM questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks.
Measure of the impact of constipation disease severity. PAC-SYM = Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (Frank 1999 and Bove 2012)
8 weeks.
Mean change from baseline on the PAC-QOL questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Measure the impact of constipation on quality of life. PAC-QOL = Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (Marquis 2005 and Bove 2012)
8 weeks
Incidence of peritoneal dialysis treatment failure requiring intervention
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Interventions include antibiotics for peritonitis, catheter re-positioning.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nova Scotia Health Authority

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jaclyn Y Tran, BScPharm, Nova Scotia Health Authority

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PDBowel2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on Current Bowel Protocol (senna/lactulose)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings