Nasal Septal Flap for Donor Site Reconstruction

June 26, 2023 updated by: Brad Woodworth, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Use of Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) Graft to Aid in Nasal Septal Remucosalization and Tissue Healing in Patients Following Use of Nasoseptal Flap Elevation for Skull Base Surgery

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the utility of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) as a graft material that may aid in the natural healing process of freshly exposed bone and cartilage in the nasal cavity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients who undergo endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery, and may require nasoseptal flap placement as part of skull base reconstruction, will be informed, consented and enrolled for participation. If the intraoperative decision is ultimately made for harvest and placement of full-length nasoseptal flap by each individual surgeon, patients will then be consecutively, sequentially randomized to use of either:

  • Thin Doyle silastic sheet placement alone over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone (20 randomly assigned patients)
  • 2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS perforated mesentery graft surface placement plus overlying Doyle silastic sheet placement over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone. (20 randomly assigned patients)

When used, Biodesign graft will be soaked in sterile saline out of the packaging, and placed as an intact single sheet over the exposed bone nasal septum bone/cartilage (without trimming). For uniformity and ease of future analysis, the bottom edge of the graft will be placed parallel to, and proximal to, the nasal floor cut edge remnant mucosal surface as possible. Except for a thin Doyle silastic sheet to cover the graft site, no additional reinforcement (suture/tissue glue) will be placed for those patients in the Biodesign graft arm.

Time Points and Study Parameters:

  • All enrolled patients will have Doyle silastic sheeting removed only at 2 weeks post-op.
  • All patients will receive 250cc normal saline topical nasal rinses starting at 14 days until 120 days post-op.
  • No topical irrigation additives (budesonide/mupirocin) will be administered over 12 weeks.

All patients will be assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks following randomization and entry into this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective transnasal endoscopic skull base surgery where closure with a large nasoseptal flap (NSF) is anticipated (exposure of >75% of the ipsilateral nasal septum bone/cartilage)
  • Patients without nutritional compromise or otherwise debilitated
  • Patients who are able to consent for themselves

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral nasoseptal flap (NSF) placement in the same operative setting
  • Patients without significant bone/cartilage exposure to incorporate an intact 2x3 cm graft
  • Patients requiring 24 hour supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula
  • Patients who cannot consent for themselves

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment Group
2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS graft placement + overlying Doyle silastic sheet placement over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone
Other: Biodesign™ SIS graft
2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS perforated mesentery graft
Other: Doyle silastic sheet
Doyle silastic sheet
Active Comparator: Control Group
Thin Doyle silastic sheet placement alone over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone
Other: Doyle silastic sheet
Doyle silastic sheet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Mean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative remucosalization is a Likert scale ranging from 0% (no remucosalization) to 100% (complete remucosalization), with higher scores representing better healing.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Mean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Mean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative crusting is a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no crusting) to 10 (complete crusting), with lower scores representing better healing.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Mean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Mean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative edema is a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no edema) to 10 (severe edema), with lower scores representing better healing.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Stanford University
Cook Group Incorporated

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Brad Woodworth, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 13, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 21, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 21, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • F140612003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasal Septum Perforation

Clinical Trials on Biodesign™ SIS graft

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings