A Study of HMPL-453 in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

February 12, 2020 updated by: Hutchison Medipharma Limited

A Phase I/II, Open-label, Multi-center, Dose Escalation Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Anti-tumor Activity of HMPL-453 in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

This is a dose escalation study consisting of two stages: Dose-escalation stage (stage 1): Patients will take a single dose of HMPL-453 on Day 1 and will be followed for one week for safety observations. After one week of observation, if no safety issues occur, patients can continue multiple dosing of HMPL-453 QD (quaque die) and start on the DLT (Dose Limited Toxicity) assessment cycles. Each cycle consists of 28-days. Patients are required to draw blood samples for PK and safety analysis at specific time points during the treatment; Dose-Expansion Stage (Stage 2): This stage is to further evaluate the safety, tolerability, PD (pharmacodynamics) profile, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of HMPL-453 at the RP2D (recommended phase 2 dose) in approximately 10 patients with advanced solid tumor.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dose-escalation stage (stage 1): Patients participating in the dose-escalation stage will take a single dose of HMPL-453 on Day 1 and will be followed for one week for safety observations. After one week of observation, if no safety issues occur, patients can continue multiple dosing of HMPL-453 QD and start on the DLT assessment cycles. Each cycle consists of 28-days. Patients are required to draw blood samples for PK and safety analysis at specific time points during the treatment.

The 3+3 design will be employed for the dose escalation and MTD ( maximum tolerated dose) determination. To limit the number of patients being exposed to potentially ineffective doses, one patient will be enrolled and dosed in the initial dose cohort. If there are no DLT or less than grade 2 toxicities of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event ( CTC AE ) occur in the first treatment cycle, then the study will be escalated to the next dose cohort. Otherwise, the trial will revert to a standard 3+3 design.

Dose-Expansion Stage (Stage 2): This stage is to further evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) profile, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of HMPL-453 at the RP2D in approximately 60 patients with advanced solid tumor. Patients with FGFR ( Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor) dysregulated advanced solid tumors, including but not limited to advanced urothelial bladder cancer, advanced cholangiocarcinoma (patients with cancers of the gallbladder or ampulla of Vater are not eligible) and others solid tumors are preferred to be enrolled.

Expansion stage will begin after dose-escalation stage is completed and the MTD/RP2D has been determined. Patients will receive HMPL-453 with 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, no longer benefiting from the study treatment per investigator's discretion, or withdrawal of consent, whichever comes first.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 10000
        • Beijing 307 Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Cancer center of SYSU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In the dose escalation stage, patients with locally advanced, or metastatic solid tumor who have failed, or intolerable to, standard therapies or for whom no standard therapies exist will be enrolled.
  • In the dose expansion stage, patients with locally advanced, or metastatic solid tumor and FGFR dysregulation who have failed or intolerable to standard therapies or no standard therapies exist are to be enrolled.
  • In the dose escalation stage: evaluable or measurable disease according to RECIST Version 1.1. In the dose expansion stage: measurable disease according to RECIST Version 1.1.
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0 or 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior or current treatment with any selective FGFR inhibitor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HMPL-453
Two strengths of HMPL-453 tablets (25 mg and 100 mg based on the free base) will be used for clinical studies. The drug products are coated tablets, which are packaged in white induction sealed HDPE (high-density polyethylene) bottles. HMPL-453 will be administered to patients as oral tablet(s) on a daily basis, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. Dose levels are to be potentially tested in this study include 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg/day
Drug: HMPL-453
oral administrative

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of DLTs by the NCI CTCAE v4.03
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (DLT assessment window 28 days)
Incidence of DLTs by the NCI CTCAE v4.03
Cycle 1 (DLT assessment window 28 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of AEs and clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
Time Frame: From first dose to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
incidence of any AEs associated to treatment
From first dose to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of HMP 453
From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax)
Time Frame: From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) of HMP 453
From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
terminal half-life (t1/2)
Time Frame: From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
terminal half-life (t1/2) of HMP-453
From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t)
Time Frame: From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) of HMP453
From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
apparent clearance (CL/F)
Time Frame: From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
apparent clearance (CL/F) of HMP 453
From first dose to day 56 of multiple dosing period
Serum phosphate level increases
Time Frame: From first dose to Day 21 of the last treatment cycle
to evaluate the fluctuate level of Serum phosphate level
From first dose to Day 21 of the last treatment cycle
Objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
per RECIST
Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
Duration of response (DoR)
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
from the date of response to progress or death
Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
the response rate of PR (partial response) +CR(complete response) +SD （stable disease）
Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
Change in tumor size
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
per RECIST to evaluate the change of target and non-target lesions
Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)
Per RECIST 1.1
Every 8 weeks while being treated with HMPL-453 (expected average of 16 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hutchison Medipharma Limited

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Weiss Yang, Doctor, HMPL

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015-453-00CH1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor, Adult

Clinical Trials on HMPL-453

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings