Novel Porcine Dermal Matrix in the Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions (NPDMMAGR)
Novel Porcine Dermal Matrix Vs. Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions of Miller Class I and II: a 12-month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR) still presents a challenge for the clinician. The management of soft tissues becomes more complicated and the wound healing may be compromised by a variety of factors.
According to the available medical databases, predictable root coverage is possible for multiple-tooth recession defects using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedures. However, alternative materials to SCTG are supported by evidence of varying strength, with the need for additional research to confirm their performance and success rate. Because of that, the aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of the acellular porcine derived collagen matrix (PADM) in comparison with connective tissue graft (SCTG ) in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR).
This study is a randomised controlled clinical trial of 12 months duration. Sixteen patients with a total of 81 MAGR Miller's Class I or II were enrolled in this study. Recessions were randomly treated with PADM and SCTG, combined with a modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT). Several parameters, such as gingival recession coverage (RC), keratinized tissue width (KTW), keratinized tissue thickness (KTT) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at baseline and one year postoperatively. Healing index (HI) was registered on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-week post-surgery in order to estimate healing events.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
- Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least two multiple maxillaries or mandibular Miller's Class I and II recession, more than >2mm defects together with similar contralateral lesions
- No active periodontal disease with PD>4mm
- Absence of the radiographic signs of periapical infection on the teeth to be treated or on the adjacent teeth
- A full mouth plaque index <20% and gingival index < 1
Exclusion Criteria:
- The inflammatory periodontal disease/ Untreated periodontal conditions
- Previous surgical attempt to correct gingival recession
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Systemic diseases with compromised healing potential or infectious diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Experimental group
Surgery 1: The tunnel technique for covering multiple gingival recessions.
Graft: porcine-derived acellular dermal collagen matrix (PADM, mucoderm® ).
|
Following local anaesthesia (Articaine hydrochloride 4% with 1:200,000 epinephrine injection) administration, sulcular incisions were made in the recession's areas of teeth without damaging interdental papilla.
Mucoperiosteal (MP) dissections were made using the periostal elevator creating the deep pouch beyond the mucogingival junction so that the (MP) flap could be moved coronally without tension.
Porcine-derived acellular dermal collagen matrix (PADM) was positioned at the level of a cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and skin tight for teeth to avoid forming a blood clot.
Separate single sutures per tooth with 5-0 resorbable suture were used to stabilise graft.
The tunnel flap was positioned coronally above the CEJ to completely cover the graft and sutured with non-resorbable polypropylene suture.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
Surgery 2: The tunnel technique for covering multiple gingival recessions.
Graft: connective tissue graft
|
Following local anaesthesia (Articaine hydrochloride 4% with 1:200,000 epinephrine injection) administration, sulcular incisions were made in the recession's areas of teeth without damaging interdental papilla.
Mucoperiosteal (MP) dissections were made using the periostal elevator creating the deep pouch beyond the mucogingival junction so that the (MP) flap could be moved coronally without tension.
Connective tissue graft was positioned at the level of a cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and skin tight for teeth to avoid forming a blood clot.
Separate single sutures per tooth with 5-0 resorbable suture were used to stabilise graft.
The tunnel flap was positioned coronally above the CEJ to completely cover the graft and sutured with non-resorbable polypropylene suture.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
mean root coverage (MRC)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The percentage of covered recession area (MRC)
|
12 months
|
|
complete root coverage (CRC)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The percentage rate of patients with complete coverage of all recessions (CRC)
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
gingival recession (GR)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance measured at the mid-buccal aspect of the tooth from the cemento-enamel junction to the most apical point of the gingival margin
|
12 months
|
|
gingival recession width (GRW)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
measured at mesio-distal direction at the level of cemento-enamel junction
|
12 months
|
|
Keratinized tissue wide (KTW)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance from the mucogingival junction to the gingival margin
|
12 months
|
|
Gingival thickness (GT)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measured at the mid- buccal aspect of treated tooth on the long axis
|
12 months
|
|
Clinical attachment level (CAL),
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance from the cemento enamel junction to the deepest point of the gingival sulcus
|
12 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probing depth (PD)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the sulcus
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 36/24
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Recession, Gingival
-
NCT07158528RecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recessions | Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate | Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
-
NCT07158541RecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
-
NCT06940050RecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recessions
-
NCT06675734CompletedGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07345520CompletedGingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07529340Not yet recruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
-
NCT07162207Active, not recruitingGingival Recession, Localized
-
NCT07521566Active, not recruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recessions
-
NCT06936592Not yet recruitingGingival Diseases | Gingival Recession, Localized | Recession, Gingival
-
NCT07602829Active, not recruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
Clinical Trials on Surgery 1
-
NCT06745596Completed
-
NCT05285332Not yet recruitingBreast Neoplasms | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Treatment | Survival
-
NCT00152217Completed
-
NCT01396967UnknownCataract | Eye Disease
-
NCT02789787Completed
-
NCT07485946Completed
-
NCT07074431Recruiting
-
NCT06852196Not yet recruitingOrthognathic Surgery | Maxillary Hypoplasia | Cleft Lip Palate
-
NCT05171582Active, not recruiting