Evaluation of Hepatic Rigidity by Ultrasonic Impulse Elastography in Liver Transplant Patients (SUPERSONIC)

May 22, 2023 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Evaluation of Hepatic Rigidity by Ultrasonic Impulse Elastography in Liver Transplant Patients (SUPERSONIC)

Interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, mono-centric.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Ultrasonic impulse elastography is a technique for studying non-invasive tissue rigidity. In particular, it is used in hepatology to assess the degree of fibrosis in a simple manner, by eliminating, in a number of cases, liver biopsy. The investigation of fibrosis is an essential element in the follow-up of patients with hepatic transplant since it is the indirect sign of a post-transplant complication or a recurrence of the initial disease.

Several elastography devices are available on the market, using different technologies to measure the rigidity of tissues. Studies have shown that the first hepatic elastography devices, Fibroscan® and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) can detect significant fibrosis on hepatic grafts accurately and reproducibly. However, there are several factors related to patients or to the elastography apparatus itself, limiting its use by making the collection of measurements impossible or by giving outliers. In addition, first-generation devices (Fibroscan®) are not coupled to a conventional ultrasound system and are dedicated to the measurement of hepatic rigidity, so patients must undergo systematic ultrasound as part of graft follow-up .

Supersonic® (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) is part of the latest generation of elastography devices and is based on ultrafast shearwave elastography (SWE) technology. This device is a conventional ultrasound system for routine ultrasound scanning with an integrated module for measuring tissue stiffness, and has the advantage of establishing real-time mappings of tissue rigidity over a large area. Several studies have shown that the measurements were reliable and reproducible, especially in the assessment of liver stiffness. In the literature, only one study addressed the measurement of hepatic rigidity with the Supersonic® ultrasound system in liver transplant patients and was designed to diagnose viral hepatitis recurrence or acute cellular rejection. In the secondary results, the authors found a significantly higher hepatic rigidity of healthy hepatic grafts compared to healthy native livers.

It is proposed to add to the ultrasound of systematic follow-up of the hepatic grafts carried out in clinical routine an elastographic measurement in order to assess the hepatic rigidity in these patients in a non-invasive way.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Rennes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 18 years and over ;
  • Hepatic transplant patient attending a day hospital of hepatology as part of the systematic follow-up of liver transplantation at 1 year, 5 years or 10 years in order to benefit from a clinical examination, biological evaluation, hepatic ultrasound, Fibroscan and Hepatic Puncture-Biopsy ;
  • Patient in a position to receive information about the protocol ;
  • Patient having given his / her written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulation disorder (platelets <60,000, Prothrombin Ratio <50%, partial thromboplastin time > 1.5 times the control unless explained by insufficient factor XII deficiency or anti-phospholipid antibodies);
  • Ascites;
  • Platelet antiaggregation taken the previous week biopsy, patient under anticoagulants;
  • Persons of full age who are subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, guardianship, guardianship), persons deprived of their liberty;
  • Patient not affiliated to social security;
  • Pregnant or nursing women;
  • Simultaneous participation in another research.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Hepatic Transplantation
Diagnostic test: Hepatic Transplantation
Systematic long-term monitoring of liver transplant patients includes an annual consultation and more comprehensive follow-up at one year, 5 years and 10 years of transplantation during which patients are hospitalized in day hospital hepatology and have a clinical examination Complete, biological assessment, Fibroscan® graft elastography measurement, hepatic Doppler ultrasound and liver biopsy. Measurement of liver stiffness by SuperSonic® will be added during ultrasound.
Other Names:
  • Supersonic® , Fibroscan andHepatic Puncture-Biopsy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hepatic graft stiffness in kPa without complication
Time Frame: Baseline
Average of the three measures taken consecutively
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hepatic graft stiffness in kPa with complication
Time Frame: Baseline
Average of the three measures taken consecutively
Baseline
The performance indicator
Time Frame: Baseline
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of Supersonic® and Fibroscan versus Hepatic Puncture-Biopsy (sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility).
Baseline
The value of the hepatic steatosis of the grafts in the form of a ratio
Time Frame: Baseline
The value of the hepatic steatosis of the grafts in the form of a ratio between the hepatic brightness and the renal brightness.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rennes University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anita Paisant, Rennes University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 24, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 35RC17_9881_SUPERSONIC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatic Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Hepatic Transplantation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings