Antibiotic Resistance and Microbiome in Children Aged 6-59 Months in Nouna, Burkina Faso (ARMCA)

February 1, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
The use of antibiotics has saved millions of human lives, however consumption of antibiotics can select for antibiotic resistant organisms and may lead to changes in commensal microbiome. This study is designed to estimate the effect of antibiotic consumption on microbiome in a rural region of rural Burkina Faso. Changes in the intestinal and nasopharyngeal microbiome and resistome following a short course of antibiotics will be measured.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is designed to better understand the effect of a short course of antibiotics on changes in intestinal and nasopharyngeal microbiome on treated children and untreated household contacts. The investigators hypothesize that a short course of antibiotics will lead to decreased bacterial diversity shortly after completion of the antibiotic course, and higher probability of identification of bacterial resistance genes in rectal and nasopharyngeal samples. The investigators hypothesize that a 5-day course of antibiotics (azithromycin, amoxicillin, or co-trimoxazole) will lead to significantly decreased intestinal and nasopharyngeal bacterial diversity among children aged 6-59 months.

Specific Aim 1. Determine the effect of treatment with antibiotics on microbiome diversity in children aged 6-59 months following a 5-day course of antibiotics.

Specific Aim 1A. Determine the direct effect of a 5-day course of azithromycin, amoxicillin, or co-trimoxazole on intestinal and nasopharyngeal bacterial diversity in children aged 6-59 months compared to no treatment.

Specific Aim 1B. Determine the indirect effect of antibiotic treatment of children in a household on intestinal and nasopharyngeal bacterial diversity in an untreated child aged 6-59 months.

Specific Aim 1C. Assess the association between intestinal bacterial diversity and anthropometry in a population-based sample of children.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
252

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Burkina Faso
      • Nouna, Burkina Faso
        • Centre de Recherche en Sante de Nouna
  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • UCSF Proctor Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Households will be eligible for inclusion in the study if they have 2 or more children aged 6 months to 59 months currently residing in the household. Children from the household will be eligible if they are 6-59 months of age and are not currently receiving antibiotic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who are allergic to any of the study antibiotics will be excluded. Individuals aged under 6 months and 5 years or older will be excluded. Children already receiving antibiotics for an ongoing disease will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Azithromycin

Comparison of nasopharyngeal and rectal microbiome in children receiving Azithromycin versus children receiving placebo Children aged 6 months to 59 months will be measured and weighed then, they will be randomized to one of the study arm and treated for 5 days.

Children will receive treatment everyday, once a day as is:

Azithromycin: 10 mg/kg once daily on Day 1, then 5 mg/kg once daily Days 2-5
Drug: Azithromycin
Children in this arm will receive Azithromycin once a day.
Other Names:
  • Zithromax
Active Comparator: Amoxicillin

Comparison of nasopharyngeal and rectal microbiome in children receiving Amoxicillin versus children receiving placebo Children aged 6 months to 59 months will be measured and weighed then, they will be randomized to one of the study arm.

Children will receive treatment everyday, twice a day as is:

Amoxicillin: 25 mg/kg/day, divided into twice daily doses for Days 1-5
Drug: Amoxicillin
Children in this arm will receive Amoxicillin twice a day.
Active Comparator: Cotrimoxazole

Comparison of nasopharyngeal and rectal microbiome in children receiving Cotri-moxazole versus children receiving placebo Children aged 6 months to 59 months will be measured and weighed then, they will be randomized to one of the study arm.

Children will receive treatment everyday, once a day as is:

Co-trimoxazole: 240 mg daily for Days 1-5
Drug: Cotrimoxazole
Children in this arm will receive co-trimoxazole once a day.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Comparison of nasopharyngeal and rectal microbiome in children receiving placebo versus children receiving antibiotics Children aged 6 months to 59 months will be measured and weighed then, they will be randomized to one of the study arm.

Children will receive Placebo everyday, once a day.
Drug: Placebo
Children in this arm will receive Placebo once a day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Simpson's Index of Diversity (Alpha Diversity) in Intestinal Microbiome
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 9
The primary outcome of the study was pre-specified as α-diversity (inverse Simpson's) at the genus level, expressed in effective number. Simpson's Alpha Diversity were obtained at Baseline and Post-treatment in this study. The minimum of Simpson's index of diversity is 0, there is no maximum. Higher Simpson's index of diversity means more diverse. There are no subscales.
Baseline and Day 9

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Simpson's Index of Diversity (Alpha Diversity) in Microbiome
Time Frame: Day 9
Direct and indirect effect of antibiotics on alpha diversity from rectal samples
Day 9
Weight-for-height Z-score
Time Frame: Day 35
Nutritional status as determined by weight-for-height Z-score vs. Placebo household Weight-for-height Z-score in each antibiotic group compared with placebo 4 weeks after last antibiotic dose Weight-for-height Z (WHZ) scores were calculated based on the 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) standards. The mean of the 2006 population standards is 0. Lower standard deviations = worse outcomes. A cutoff of < -2 means moderately wasted (WHZ). A cutoff of < -3 means wasted (WHZ).
Day 35
Height-for-age Z-score
Time Frame: Day 35
Nutritional status as determined by height-for-age Z-score Height-for-age Z-score in each antibiotic group compared with placebo 4 weeks after last antibiotic dose Height-for-age Z (HAZ) score were calculated based on the 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) standards. The mean of the 2006 population standards is 0. Lower standard deviations = worse outcomes. A cutoff of < -2 means moderately stunted (HAZ). A cutoff of < -3 means severely stunted (HAZ).
Day 35
Weight-for-age Z-score
Time Frame: Day 35
Nutritional status as determined by weight-for-age Z-score vs. Placebo household Weight-for-age Z-score in each antibiotic group compared with placebo 4 weeks after last antibiotic dose Weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) scores were calculated based on the 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) standards. The mean of the 2006 population standards is 0. Lower standard deviations = worse outcomes. A cutoff of < -2 means moderately underweight (WAZ). A cutoff of < -3 means severely underweight (WAZ).
Day 35
Mid-upper Arm Circumference
Time Frame: Day 35

Nutritional status as determined by mid-upper arm circumference in each antibiotic group compared with placebo 4 weeks after last antibiotic dose Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) in each antibiotic group compared with placebo 4 weeks after last antibiotic dose.

MUAC is a measure to assess nutritional status. It is measured on a straight left arm, mid-way between the tip of the shoulder and the tip of the elbow. It identifies acute malnutrition and is commonly used in children 6-59 months of age as well as pregnant women. MUAC less than 115 mm indicates severe wasting or severe acute malnutrition (SAM). MUAC greater than or equal to 115 mm and less than 125 mm indicates moderate wasting or moderate acute malnutrition (MAM).
Day 35
Shannon's Index of Diversity (Alpha Diversity) in Intestinal Microbiome
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 9 (Post- Treatment)
Shannon's Alpha Diversity at Baseline and Post-treatment. combines richness and diversity. Shannon's index of diversity (alpha diversity) measures both the number of species and the inequality between species abundances. A large value is given by the presence of many species with well balanced abundances.
Baseline and Day 9 (Post- Treatment)
Shannon's Index of Diversity (Alpha Diversity) in Nasopharyngeal Microbiome
Time Frame: Day 9
Direct and indirect effects of antibiotics on Shannon's index of bacterial diversity
Day 9
L1-norm Distance on Bacterial Reads (Intestinal)
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 9 (Post- Treatment)
L1-norm distance on bacterial reads (intestinal) - L1 norm is equivalent to Shannon's diversity. Shannon's Alpha Diversity combines richness and diversity. Shannon's index of diversity (alpha diversity) measures both the number of species and the inequality between species abundances. A large value is given by the presence of many species with well balanced abundances.
Baseline and Day 9 (Post- Treatment)
L1-norm Distance on Bacterial Reads (Nasopharyngeal)
Time Frame: Day 9
L1-norm distance on bacterial reads (nasopharyngeal)
Day 9
L2-norm Distance on Bacterial Reads (Intestinal)
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 9 (Post- Treatment)
L2-norm distance on bacterial reads (intestinal) - L2 norm is equivalent to Simpson's diversity. Simpson's Alpha Diversity were obtained at Baseline and Post-treatment in this study. The minimum of Simpson's index of diversity is 0, there is no maximum. Higher Simpson's index of diversity means more diverse. There are no subscales.
Baseline and Day 9 (Post- Treatment)
L2-norm Distance on Bacterial Reads (Nasopharyngeal)
Time Frame: Day 9
L2-norm distance on bacterial reads (nasopharyngeal)
Day 9
Number of Participants With Macrolide Resistance Genes
Time Frame: 2 years
Prevalence of macrolide resistance genes measured using DNA-seq from rectal swabs.
2 years
Alpha Diversity in the Intestinal Microbiome
Time Frame: 2 years
Alpha diversity in the intestinal microbiome using DNA-seq from rectal swabs
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Francisco

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Heidelberg University
Centre de Recherche en Sante de Nouna, Burkina Faso

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas M Lietman, MD, UCSF F.I. Proctor Foundation
  • Study Director: Catherine E Oldenburg, ScD, UCSF F.I. Proctor Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-22036

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Development

Clinical Trials on Azithromycin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings