Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of NV1205 in Pediatric Male Subjects With Adrenoleukodystrophy

March 6, 2019 updated by: NeuroVia, Inc.

Phase I/II, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of NV1205 in Pediatric Male Subjects With Childhood Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CCALD)

This is a phase I/II, open label dose escalation study of multiple dose levels of NV1205 with a long-term treatment phase.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of NV1205 in pediatric patients diagnosed with childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CCALD).

The study consists of:

  • Screening period: within 30 days of first dose
  • Main treatment period of 12 weeks (Part 1- from Screening to Week 12)
  • Long Term Treatment (LTT) period (Part 2- Week 13 through Week 96)

In Part 1, subjects will have an initial 4-week treatment period at the assigned dose and, if no safety concerns are noted, subjects continue for another 8 weeks of extended safety assessment.

There will be several cohorts of subjects enrolled. After each Cohort has completed the 4-week initial safety assessment, the safety data will be reviewed by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and, subject to DSMB recommendation, Cohort 2 will be enrolled and receive the next dose level. After Cohort 2 has completed 4 weeks of treatment, the DSMB will review all available safety data (Cohorts 1 and 2) and, subject to DSMB recommendation, Cohort 3 will be enrolled and receive the next dose level. Additional Cohorts may be enrolled at the recommendation of the DSMB with an incremental dose increase.

In Part 2, subjects will continue to receive treatment in the LTT period of the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital Austral
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
  • Australia
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Health
  • Chile
      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran
      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna
  • Colombia
      • Bogotá, Colombia
        • Fundacion Cardioinfantil
  • France
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Bicêtre - Paris Sud
  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Endocrinology Research Center
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Moscow Morozov's Children Clinical Hospital
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
  • Ukraine
      • Kiev, Ukraine
        • National Children's Specialized Hospital 'OKHMATDET'
  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Manchester Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males ≥4 years and <18 years of age
  2. CCALD diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing
  3. Loes score of >0 and ≤15
  4. Patients on VLCFA lowering agents such as Lorenzo's oil must stop the medication and have high VLCFA levels before enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant medical conditions such as heart, thyroid, or liver disease
  • HSCT recipients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 2 years
Adverse events
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the curve concentration of NV1205 in plasma
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A sparse sampling approach will be utilized to estimate a 24-hr area under the curve of NV1205 plasma concentration
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Loes score
Time Frame: 2 years
Percent change from baseline in brain lesions assessed as Loes score will be calculated
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NeuroVia, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: John Henderson, MD, NeuroVia, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NV1205-009

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy

Clinical Trials on Sobetirome (NV1205)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings