Virtual Reality Exposure in Spider Phobia

February 10, 2020 updated by: Ulrike Lueken, Julius-Maximilians University

Exposure Treatment in Anxiety Disorders: Proof of Principle for an a Priori Response Prediction Approach

While knowledge on the neurobiological signatures of fear and anxiety disorders and, in particular, their association with treatment outcome is accumulating, clinical translation still awaits empirical proof of evidence. Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment, but clinically significant change is only seen in approx. 50-65% of patients. Patient stratification is a powerful option to increase treatment response; however, developing prognostic markers suitable for single-patient predictions still is in its infancy and crucially requires external cross-validation embedded within an a priori prediction approach - a procedure yet largely missing in the field of biomarker research. Employing a bicentric strategy the aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that a priori prediction of treatment outcome based on neurobiological measures is possible in a second, independent sample. Building upon findings from previous mechanistic studies, These will be incorporated into the development of a predictive pattern comprising fear-relevant genotypes and molecules targeting neuropeptides, related epigenetic signatures as well as neurofunctional activation patterns associated with fear circuitry functions, and clinical data. Pre-treatment neurobiological signatures will be tested for their potential as a predictive response marker towards behavioral exposure (virtual reality exposure treatment (VRET) and an in vivo behavioral avoidance test) in a model disorder of fear circuitry dysfunctions (spider phobia). Multivariate pattern analyses employing a machine learning framework will be used to generate predictions on the individual patient level and to cross-validate markers in a second, independent sample. While at site A predictions will be generated following completion of the treatment, response will be predicted at site B a priori, but in a double-blind manner. Comparison of observed vs. predicted response rates will serve as a test of hypothesis. In addition, neuroplastic (on a subsample) and epigenetic changes induced by VRET treatment will be assessed following treatment and, in case of epigenetics, also after 6-months follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
338

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Bavaria
      • Wuerzburg, Bavaria, Germany, 97080
        • Center of Mental Health, Dept. of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychiatry, University Hospital of Wuerzburg
    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 48149
        • Dept. of Psychiatry, University Hospital Münster

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 or older
  • specific phobia (animal subtype: spider phobia) according to criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Version (DSM-5)
  • right-handedness
  • Caucasian descent
  • willingness to participate in massed exposure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients exhibiting a primary other anxiety disorder (panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder), acute suicidality, psychotic, bipolar I, obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, severe major depression, borderline personality disorder or substance dependency (except nicotine)
  • patients fulfilling MRI-related exclusion criteria
  • patients with current pharmacological or psychotherapeutic treatment, as well as those already previously treated with exposure-based CBT
  • pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: virtual reality exposure
one-session exposure conveyed via virtual reality technology
Behavioral: virtual reality exposure
one-session exposure conveyed via virtual reality technology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Change in spider phobia symptoms before (baseline) to after therapy
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Avoidance Text (BAT)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Change (in cm) in the extend to which a living spider can be approached from before to after therapy
4 weeks
Behavioral Avoidance Text (BAT)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change (in cm) in the extend to which a living spider can be approached from before vs. after 6 month follow-up period
6 months
Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Clinician rated symptom severity after completion of treatment (4 weeks)
4 weeks
Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)
Time Frame: 6 month
Clinician rated symptom severity after 6 month follow-up period
6 month
Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in spider phobia symptoms before (baseline) vs. after 6 month follow-up period
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Julius-Maximilians University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Hospital Muenster

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ulrike Lueken, Prof. Dr., University Hospital of Wuerzburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 30, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Spider_VR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Specific Phobia

Clinical Trials on virtual reality exposure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings