A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway. (Kivi)
A Comparison of the Novel King Vision Pediatric aBlade and the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope to the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway. A Bicentric, Prospective, Randomized Manikin Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Rhineland-Palatinate
-
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, 55131
- Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- anesthesiologists or neonatal/pediatric intensive care medicice specialists with experience in securing pediatric airway
Exclusion Criteria:
- participants without experience in pediatric airway management
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: normal airway
Time (normal airway) using the novel King Vision™ Pediatric aBlade (KV) video laryngoscope, C-MAC™ D-blade Ped (DP), C-MAC™ Miller Blade (MB), shortened as VL, compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
|
The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
|
|
Experimental: difficult airway
Time (difficult airway) using the novel King Vision™ Pediatric aBlade (KV) video laryngoscope, C-MAC™ D-blade Ped (DP), C-MAC™ Miller Blade (MB), shortened as VL, compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
|
The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to ventilation (seconds)
Time Frame: Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation (seconds)
|
Three timepoints will be recorded, beginning with the insertion of the device past the theeth/gum into the mouth.
These will inlcude time to best view, time to removal of device from the mouth, and the time to the first chest raising of the simulator
|
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation (seconds)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation (in 40 seconds)
Time Frame: Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
|
An attempt at tracheal intubation will be defined as entry of the device into the patient's mouth without the need to remove the device once entered and securing the airway.
|
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
|
|
Grades of Laryngeal View (Cormack&Lehane Class)
Time Frame: Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
|
Cormack&Lehane Grade (1-4) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) (%) will be recorded after insertion of the laryngoscope
|
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
|
|
Use of ELM
Time Frame: Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
|
BURP or change the head/Shoulder position to optimised the glottic view will be recorded
|
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
|
|
Intubation Adjustments & Ease of Use
Time Frame: Assessed intraoperatively following intubation
|
Airway manipulations utilized and ease of use (Likert 1-5) will be assessed by the user following the intubation.
|
Assessed intraoperatively following intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marc Kriege, MD, University Medical Centre Mainz
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Johannes GU
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT04196582CompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway Aspiration | Complication of Anesthesia | Esophagus Injury | Supraglottic Airway Efficiency | Endoscopic Ergonomics | ERCP Airway Management
-
NCT04816435UnknownAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication
-
NCT05657028RecruitingAnesthesia | Airway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT03903679CompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway Aspiration
-
NCT06443424Not yet recruitingAirway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT05759299RecruitingAirway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT05673707RecruitingAirway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT05218707RecruitingAirway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT03664700TerminatedAirway Complication of Anesthesia
-
NCT05899868CompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia
Clinical Trials on normal airway
-
NCT03173651CompletedFiberoptic Tracheal Intubation
-
NCT02850757CompletedEndotracheal Intubation
-
NCT07204223RecruitingDifficult Mask Ventilation | Airway Devices
-
NCT05832554CompletedGastric Insufflation | Difficult Mask Ventilation
-
NCT04238507Unknown
-
NCT03969147UnknownAirway Obstruction | Respiratory Complication
-
NCT07185516Enrolling by invitationAirway Ultrasound Indices | Clinical Airway Assessment
-
NCT04253886Completed
-
NCT03697642CompletedAnesthesia, General | Nasogastric Tube | Nasopharyngeal Airway