- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04844723
Pediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification (PeDiAC)
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Difficult tracheal intubation is one of the major reasons for anesthesia-related adverse events. Videolaryngoscopy has become an important part of the anesthesiology standard of care for difficult airway management in the past decades. This is especially relevant in children, as their airway anatomy differs greatly from adults because they are likely incapable of tolerating brief apneic episodes. Still, medical preconditions and procedural and technical factors related to difficult videolaryngoscopy have not been broadly investigated and not fully been understood.
The primary aim of the PeDiAC study is to develop and validate a multivariable diagnostic model for the classification of difficult videolaryngoscopy (the 'PeDiAC classification') in children undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Study planning and conduction are in accordance with the TRIPOD 'Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis' statement. The secondary aim is to compare the diagnostic performance of the PeDiAC-classification with the Cormack-Lehane classification, which is the current clinical standard for assessing intubation via direct laryngoscopy. We conduct a prospective observational study that will include approximately 800 pediatric patients within one year scheduling for tracheal intubation. Patients with age below 18 years will be considered to be eligible for inclusion. Procedural and surgical data, as well as medical preconditions, will be assessed systematically. After tracheal intubation, performed by the responsible anesthetist, the intubation process will be rated by the responsible anesthetist and an additional independent observer, and detailed information regarding procedural and technical factors related to videolaryngoscopy will be documented. All sampled independent variables will be considered to be potential candidate predictors for the multivariable regression model.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hamburg, Germany, 20246
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation in the study center.
- Informed consent obtained
- Age < 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anesthetist prefers conventional laryngoscopy
- Indication for intubation via a bronchoscope or awake intubation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Rating by the responsible anesthetist
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Airway-related adverse events
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Laryngospasm, bronchospasm, larynx trauma, airway trauma, soft tissue trauma, oral bleeding, edema, dental damage, corticosteroid application, accidental esophageal intubation, aspiration, hypotension or hypoxia
|
1 hour
|
|
First pass success rate
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Percentage of successful intubations with one attempt
|
1 hour
|
|
Overall success rate with the first-choice technique
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Percentage of successful intubations without transition to another technique
|
1 hour
|
|
Number of attempts
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Total number of laryngoscopy and intubation attempts until airway established
|
1 hour
|
|
Change of airway technique
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Transition to a different technique, i.e. flexible bronchoscopy, surgical airway, supraglottic airway as clinically assessed (Yes/No)
|
1 hour
|
|
Best glottic view
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Best view on the larynx obtained during laryngoscopy assessed by Cormack/Lehane classification (grade I to IV)
|
1 hour
|
|
Time to best view
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Time until optimal view conditions during laryngoscopy
|
1 hour
|
|
Intubation time
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Time until successful tracheal intubation
|
1 hour
|
|
Intubation difficulty, ease of intubation and quality of visualisation
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Subjective ratings on visual analogue scales (0 to 100 with 0 being the best)
|
1 hour
|
|
Post-intubation recommendation for an intubation method
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Requirement of recommendation for further intubations of the responsible anesthetist
|
1 hour
|
|
Post-intubation recommendation for an anesthesia alert cart
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Recommendation of the responsible anesthetist (yes/no)
|
1 hour
|
|
Post-intubation diagnosis of 'difficult intubation'
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Rating of the responsible anesthetist
|
1 hour
|
|
Difficult bag-mask ventilation
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
As clinically assessed (yes/no) by the responsible anesthetist
|
1 hour
|
|
Lowest oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Measured with pulsoxymetry during anesthesia
|
1 hour
|
|
Hypercapnia
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Measured endtidal carbon dioxide after successful intubation
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Christian Zöllner, MD, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Study Director: Martin Petzoldt, MD, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Study Chair: Thorsten W Dohrmann, MD, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-10380-BO-ff
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Management
-
Royal Hospital, OmanNot yet recruitingDifficult Airway | Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management
-
Bursa City HospitalEmre ULUSOYNot yet recruitingAirway Management | Difficult AirwayTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Difficult Airway IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
NHS TaysideTerminated
-
Akdeniz University HospitalCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Obstetric AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Thomas RivaThe Hospital for Sick Children; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Charite... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAirway ManagementUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Canada, Germany, Brazil
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruiting
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)