- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04196582
LMA® Gastro Airway Versus Gastro-Laryngeal Tube in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Comparison of LMA® Gastro Airway and Gastro-Laryngeal Tube in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: a Prospective Randomized Observational Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are produced for avoiding endotracheal intubation for anesthesic interventions. Second generation SGA's like GLT and LMA® Gastro airway are using for endoscopic biliopancreatic procedures. Both of them have an airway canal and endoscopic canal. Although they can use for same reason, their designs are different. So, their airway securities, endoscopic manipulations and complications, would be different.
This study planned as single blind. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical status 1-2 100 patients which will be take endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) included. The study starts after randomization and ends after discharge from the recovery room. All patients will be monitorised for hemodynamic parameters. Depth of anesthesia will be provided by bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. After anesthesia induction SGA will placed by an experienced anesthesiologist. Bilateral chest movements and auscultation, capnogram graphy and oropharyngeal leak pressure test will be used for confirmation of placement. After procedure endoscopist will take pictures of esophagus and hypopharynx. After extubation and sufficient consciousness and breathing of patient, patients will be transferred to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Vital parameters will continue to monitoring in PACU. Patients will be discharge as usual with an Aldrete score ≥ 9.
Data will be collected during the procedure and in recovery room. Data will be stored in electronic database without mention to patient's name.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Bezmialem Vakif University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA Physical Status 1-2
- Elective Procedures
- Weight 50-100 Kg
Exclusion Criteria:
- Laryngeal mask airway contraindications.
- Anesthesic drug allergies
- Height <155 cm
- Body Mass index > 35 kg/m2
- Alcohol or narcotic drug usage
- Restrictive or obstructive pulmonary diseases
- Hepatic cardiac or renal failure
- Psychotic problems
- Neurologic or cognitive deficiencies.
- Pregnancy
- Difficult airway or facial deformities
- Previous cervical surgery or cervical radiotherapy
- Previous esophagus surgery
- High risk of pulmonary aspiration
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Gastro-laryngeal tube Group (Group G)
Patients wear Gastro-laryngeal tube after receiving general anesthesia for biliopancreatic procedures
|
comparing efficiency and complications of second generation airway devices which can use for gastrointestinally procedures
|
Active Comparator: LMA Gastro Airway Group (Group L)
Patients wear LMA Gastro Airway® after receiving general anesthesia for biliopancreatic procedures
|
comparing efficiency and complications of second generation airway devices which can use for gastrointestinally procedures
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Oropharyngeal leak pressure
Time Frame: Intra-operative; after device insertion
|
Oropharyngeal leak pressure is the airway pressure at which the circuit pressure stabilizes by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a constant gas flow of 3 L / min.
|
Intra-operative; after device insertion
|
Endoscopist satisfaction analysis: score
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure
|
Endoscopist will score from 0 (worst) to 10 (best)
|
Immediately after the procedure
|
Leakage rate percentages
Time Frame: Intra-operative; after device insertion at first minute
|
The leakage rate percentage is the calculation of the difference between the adjusted tidal volume and the exhaled tidal volume and then proportioning to the adjusted tidal volume.
|
Intra-operative; after device insertion at first minute
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Hypopharyngeal/Esophageal Mucosal status
Time Frame: Within the first minute after the procedure is completed, while the duodenoscope is being removed while it passes through the esophagus and hypopharynx
|
Number of patients with hyperemia, laceration (while extubating patient, endoscopist will take pictures of esophagus for if there is any mucosal damage).
Esophageal and hypopharyngeal mucosal damage was determined in 5 grades by a visual mucosal damage scoring system [grade 1- normal mucosa, grade 2- mild hyperemia, grade 3-severe hyperemia, grade 4-bloody gross hyperemia, grade 5- laceration].
|
Within the first minute after the procedure is completed, while the duodenoscope is being removed while it passes through the esophagus and hypopharynx
|
Blood staining on the device
Time Frame: Immediately after removing the supraglottic airway device
|
Whether there is blood on the supraglottic airway device or not
|
Immediately after removing the supraglottic airway device
|
Presence of sore throat
Time Frame: One hour after extubation
|
Sore throat if present, was classified as mild, moderate or severe.
|
One hour after extubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Bezmialem Vakif University
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Complication of Anesthesia
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación...UnknownAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruitingAnesthesia | Airway Complication of AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway AspirationTurkey
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedAirway Management | Anesthesia | Airway Complication of Anesthesia | Intubation;Difficult | LaryngoscopyGermany
-
Yunus EmreNot yet recruitingAirway Complication of Anesthesia
-
Benha UniversityRecruitingAirway Complication of AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of AnesthesiaChina
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknownAirway Complication of AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownAirway Complication of Anesthesia
Clinical Trials on Comparison of LMA Gastro Airway® and Gastro-Laryngeal Tube in patients who will undergo biliopancreatic procedures.
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway Aspiration | Bronchospasm | Complication of Anesthesia | Esophagus Injury | Supraglottic Airway Efficiency | Endoscopic Ergonomics | ERCP Airway Management | Bleeding NoseTurkey