Low Skill Fibreoptic Intubation I-gel vs Air-Q

Comparison of 'Low Skill Fibreoptic Tracheal Intubation' Via I-gel® and Air-Q® Supraglottic Airway Devices in Patients With Simulated Difficult Airways.

Tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia is the gold standard for securing the airway and for protecting the lungs against gastric aspiration. The conventional technique involves the use of a metal laryngoscope inserted into the mouth to create an air space, to allow insertion of an endotracheal tube.

Alternatively, an oral airway device (called a supraglottic device (SGD)) can be used for tracheal intubation. The SGD is first inserted. A fibrescope is inserted down the shaft of the SGD and into the trachea. This allows an endotracheal tube (previously pre-loaded onto the fibrescope) to be railroaded of the fibrescope and into the trachea. This technique is called 'low skill fibreoptic intubation' as the SGD acts as a guide for the fibrescope. Our study compares the performance of two SGD: i-gel and air-Q. The investigators will compare intubation success rate, insertion rate, and times for SGD insertion and intubation.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Anesthesia
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: i-gel airway; Device: air-Q airway

Detailed Description

The investigators are testing to see if fibreoptic intubation in patients via a supraglottic airway device i.e. 'low skill fibreoptic intubation' (LSFOI) is more successful via the i-gel® than in the air-Q®. Patients are those scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia who would normally require tracheal intubation. The investigator's hypothesis is based on the results of the investigator's recent manikin study (CIRB 2014/2039). The investigators would like to see if this hypothesis translates to patients. It will also test secondary outcomes e.g. SGD insertion success rates and times, and intubation times. In the aforementioned manikin study, the air-Q® performed better with the SGD insertion rates and times. However, the i-gel® performed better with intubation success rates and times. The devices may perform different due to differences between the devices: design (shape, volume, length, aperture), material composition, and technique required for insertion and intubation.

24 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in the major operating theater of Singapore General Hospital will be enrolled. The patient will then be randomised in equal proportions into two groups, either the air-Q® or i-gel®. Patients will undergo induction of general anaesthesia in a standardised fashion and in accordance with usual practice in the investigator's department of anaesthesia. Intubation will then proceed with the assigned airway device. Data collected will include successful endotracheal intubation, as evidenced by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide on a capnograph. Time to intubation (from the initial handling of the airway device until successful intubation is confirmed with successful lung ventilation), the number of attempts required and the view achieved (according to the modified Cormack and Lehane scoring system) will also be recorded. Injuries to the lips, teeth or upper airway will be sought and documented by a blinded observer in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit.

A protocol will be provided to standardise the induction of general anaesthesia. This will involve the application of standard patient monitors, a period of pre-oxygenation, and administration of anaesthetic agents and muscle relaxants. If the patient desaturates to SpO2 < 94% during intubation, the intubation attempt via either the air-Q® or i-gel® will be abandoned and intubation will proceed using the conventional direct laryngoscope.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 30
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Singapore
  • Singapore, Singapore, 169608
    • Recruiting
    • Singapore General Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with a physical status of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I/II and over 21 years old, having elective surgery, who require endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

• ASA class III/IV
• Patients with history of previous difficult endotracheal intubation

• Patients with two or more predictors of difficult airway management (criteria 1-8, below)

  1. Airway masses
  2. Mallampati (oropharygneal space grading) III or IV
  3. Thyromental distance < 6.5cm
  4. Inter-incisor distance < 3 cm
  5. Head extension < 30 degrees
  6. Edentulous
  7. Large beard
  8. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) or snorer
• Patients needing a rapid sequence induction
• Pregnant women

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: i-gel airway; I-gel inserted for the low skill fibreoptic intubation technique	Device: i-gel airway; Fibreoptic intubation via i-gel airway device
EXPERIMENTAL: air-Q airway; Air-Q inserted for the low skill fibreoptic intubation technique	Device: air-Q airway; Fibreoptic intubation via air-Q airway device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Success of low skill fibreoptic intubation using the i-gel or air-Q airway devices measured end tidal carbon dioxide levels	Successful intubation indicated by normal end tidal carbon dioxide levels and trace	3 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Airway device insertion times	Time from picking up device to obtaining adequate canpography tracing	3 minutes
Low skill fibreoptic intubation times	Time from picking up fibrescope to obtaining adequate canpography tracing	3 minutes
Complication rate	Complications due to airway and fiberscope insertion and use	Time of intubation and up to one day postoperative recovery period

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Singapore General Hospital
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Patrick Wong, Patrick, Singapore General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• de Lloyd LJ, Subash F, Wilkes AR, Hodzovic I. A comparison of fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through the Ambu (R) Aura-i , the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel : a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2015 May;70(5):591-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.12988. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
• Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q((R)) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
• Moon HS, Lee JY, Chon JY, Lee H, Kim D. Air-Q(R)sp-assisted awake fiberoptic bronchoscopic intubation in a patient with Ludwig's angina. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Dec;67(Suppl):S23-4. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.S.S23. No abstract available.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): January 1, 2017
• Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED): June 1, 2017
• Study Completion (ANTICIPATED): June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 18, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 21, 2016
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): January 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): May 1, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 27, 2017
• Last Verified: April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 1601LSFOI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO