Hepatic Urea Nitrogen Handling in Patients With NASH

May 13, 2024 updated by: University of Aarhus

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Hepatic Urea Nitrogen Handling and Cognitive Functions in Patients With Severe Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The aim of the project is to investigate the metabolic regulation of the hepatic urea nitrogen handling and various cognitive functions measured by psychometric and neurophysiological tests before and after bariatric surgery in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

NAFLD is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the western world affecting 10-30% of the general population. It is strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome caused by overweight and obesity. NAFLD is a spectrum of liver disease ranging from steatosis (hepatocytic fat accumulation occurs without hepatocellular injury), to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (steatosis is accompanied by inflammation and hepatocyte injury with or without fibrosis) and to cirrhosis in patients that are not consuming excessive alcohol. The prognosis of patients with simple steatosis appears benign whereas NASH often has a progressive course with increased liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Patients with liver disease often have impairment of metabolic liver functions. The liver has numerous functions, which are essential for maintenance of life e.g. urea synthesis. This function is central in whole body nitrogen (N) homeostasis and removes ammonia, which is produced during N conversion and is extremely toxic especially for brain functions. Impairment of urea synthesis causes increased ammonia concentrations in the blood, which is taken up by the brain and contributes to development of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver disease. This condition is one of the most debilitating complications of liver disease as it affects cognitive functions and with increasing severity also behaviour and motor function. The mild stage (termed minimal hepatic encephalopathy) causes subtle cognitive dysfunction, which can only be detected by means of special tests. The more severe stages (manifest hepatic encephalopathy) are accompanied by manifest dysfunction of sleep pattern and orientation eventually leading to liver coma. The condition is reversible and no structural brain damage occurs.

We seek to investigate the consequences of bariatric surgery on liver and brain function with a special focus on NASH patients. The investigations will comprise examination of the capacity for urea synthesis and various psychometric and neurophysiological tests to evaluate the patient's cognitive functions before and 18 months after surgery.

A liver biopsy will be availed at the time of surgical intervention and genetic and functional characterization of urea cycle enzymes will be performed to correlate with histological scores, clinical disease staging and ammonia/capacity for urea synthesis. A further liver biopsy will be performed after 18 months to determine if there has been any change in NAFLD disease stage and urea cycle enzymes after intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Karen Louise Thomsen, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +45 78463892
  • Email: karethom@rm.dk

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Obese patients referred for bariatric surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Referred for bariatric surgery (BMI > 40 kg/m2 or BMI > 35 kg/m2 and obesity-related complications
  • Steatosis on ultrasound (US)
  • Alcohol intake < 40g/day
  • Exclusion of other liver diseases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic inflammatory diseases
  • Acute severe bacterial infection (sepsis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection etc.)
  • Cancer
  • Neurological diseases
  • Prednisolone treatment within the last 8 weeks
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Functional Hepatic Nitrogen Clearance (FHNC)
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months
FHNC is a validated method for assessing the conversion of amino-nitrogen to urea-nitrogen by the liver
Baseline and 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urea cycle enzymes (protein and gene level)
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months
Examined in liver biopsy
Baseline and 18 months
Changes in The Portosystemic Encephalopathy Syndrome-Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months
To evaluate changes in the patient's cognitive functions
Baseline and 18 months
Changes in Continuous Reaction Time Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months
To evaluate changes in the patient's cognitive functions
Baseline and 18 months
Changes in Critical Flicker Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months
To evaluate changes in the patient's cognitive functions
Baseline and 18 months
Changes in EEG
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 months
To evaluate potential changes in the patient's EEG
Baseline and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Aarhus

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Karen Louise Thomsen, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 21, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FHNC-bariatric

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings