Preeclampsia Ratio (sFlt-1/PlGF) (PRECOG)

March 6, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Preeclampsia Ratio (sFlt-1/PlGF) Evaluation for Clinical and Obstetrical Guidance

The aim of the PRECOG study is to determine in a prospective interventional randomized study whether the implementation of a predictive test based on the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio improves perinatal care and reduces costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 weeks of gestation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy associated with placental insufficiency and is one of the major important of prematurity and maternal mortality worldwide. It complicates 2 to 7% of pregnancies. It is currently considered that preeclampsia is associated with maternal endothelial dysfunction induced by the release into the maternal circulation of excess placental factors (such as sFLT-1 a soluble receptor for VEGF and PlGF). There is currently no curative treatment, and only childbirth and delivery of the placenta alleviate the mother's symptoms. Moreover, the evolution from case with mild symptoms to a severe case of preeclampsia is often is often rapid and difficult to anticipate. Therefore, it is recommended to manage patients with preeclampsia in hospital and cases of suspected preeclampsia are usually admitted in prenatal units. Each year thousands of patients are hospitalized for surveillance and blood/urine analysis to rule out the diagnosis of preeclampsia. A biological test to predict preeclampsia would therefore be of particular interest in order to:

  • identify patients without preeclampsia and therefore void costs and iatrogenic complications related to unnecessary hospitalization
  • identify patients at high risk of maternal and perinatal complications in order to anticipate in utero transfer, optimize maternal and fetal surveillance and administrate steroids.

It has recently been demonstrated that sFLT-1 and PlGF have a high predictive value for the diagnosis and the prediction of preeclampsia, but the interest of introducing these markers in clinical practice has not been demonstrated yet. The diagnostic and predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in patients at risk of placenta-related disorders has been shown in the recent literature and estimation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio has become an additional tool in the management of these disorders, primarily PE. This ratio can distinguish the patients that develop maternal or perinatal complications in the next 7-14 days from those with uncomplicated pregnancy. Women with an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio<38 do not have PE at the time of the test and in all likelihood will not develop PE for at least 1week; it is thereby of great value for reassuring the clinician and the patient. Up to 80% of patients are supposed to be in this patient group; therefore, clinicians are able to exclude the majority of patients and focus on those who need more attention and care. On contrary women with a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 and more specifically those with a ratio over 85 are highly likely to develop preeclampsia and should be managed according to local practice/guidelines. Thus the use of such predictive tool appear very promising but its interest has not been demonstrated in prospective intervention studies.

The aim of the PRECOG study is to determine in a prospective interventional randomized study whether the implementation of a predictive test based on the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio improves perinatal care and reduces costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 WG. costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 WG.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
84

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • CHU Cochin, Maternité Port Royal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient hospitalized for suspected preeclampsia between 24WG+ 0 days and 35WG + 6 days,

Patiente with at least one of the following criteria:

  • Arterial hypertension defined by systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg
  • Proteinuria greater than 0.3g / 24h or 0.3g / l or ≥ 3+
  • Proteinuria / creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg / mmol
  • Pain in the epigastric bar
  • Generalized edema
  • Hepatic cytolysis> 1.5N
  • Thrombocytopenia <150000 / mm3 Informed consent signed by both parties Non-opposition was accepted by parental authority Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of preeclampsia (arterial pressure> 140/90 and proteinuria> 0.3g / 24h or urine test> 3+) or complete HELLP syndrome (Platelets <100000 / mm3 and SGOT> 2N and LDH and collapsed Haptoglobin)

IUGR with absent or reverse diastolic umbilical flow

Fetal heart rate abnormalities

Gestational age <24 WG and> 35 WG

Multiple pregnancy

Patient without health insurance

Non-consent of patient

Minor patient

Congenital malformation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control
Usual management
Experimental: Experimental
Ambulatory management if sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio is below 38 Usual management if sFlt-1/PlGF is between 38 and 85. If the ratio is > 85, monitoring will be intensified and patient hospitalization will be continued
Biological: sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio
  • Ambulatory management if sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio is below 38
  • usual management if sFlt-1/PlGF is between 38 and 85.
  • If the ratio is > 85, monitoring will be intensified and patient hospitalization will be continued

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of patients hospitalised for more than 24 hours
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Duration in hours, from admission to discharge from hospital at initial hospitalisation
up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal and fetal morbidity
Time Frame: up to 13 weeks
severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Disseminated intravascular coagulation, abruptio placenta, delivery before 34 WA, IUGR< 3°P, Fetal death
up to 13 weeks
Maternal morbidity
Time Frame: up to 13 weeks
High blood pressure, preeclampsia, caesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage> 500 ml
up to 13 weeks
Severe Maternal morbidity (Composite outcome )
Time Frame: up to 13 weeks
eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Abruption placenta
up to 13 weeks
Number of days between randomisation and delivery
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Number of days between randomisation and delivery
up to 12 weeks
Mode of delivery
Time Frame: At delivery
Cesarean, vaginal delivery
At delivery
Gestational age
Time Frame: at delivery
Gestational age at delivery
at delivery
Birth weight centile
Time Frame: At delivery
Centile of birth weight
At delivery
Fetal death
Time Frame: up to 13 weeks
Fetal death diagnosed at ultrasound before delivery
up to 13 weeks
Prematurity before 37 WG
Time Frame: up to 13 weeks
Delivery before 37 WG + 0 days
up to 13 weeks
Prematurity before 34 WG
Time Frame: Delivery
Delivery before 34 WG + 0 days
Delivery
Prematurity before 32 WG
Time Frame: Delivery
Delivery before 32 WG + 0 days
Delivery
Perinatal morbidity (Composite outcome)
Time Frame: At delivery
prematurity, birth weight <10 ° P
At delivery
Severe Perinatal morbidity (Composite outcome)
Time Frame: At delivery
perinatal mortality, prematurity <34 SA, birth weight <3 ° P
At delivery
Costs
Time Frame: up to 14 weeks
direct costs of prenatal care, direct costs of neonatal care, total costs
up to 14 weeks
Satisfaction form
Time Frame: Day 3 after delivery
Satisfaction concerning the management of pregnancy and duration of hospitalisation
Day 3 after delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jean GUIBOURDENCHE, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P161101

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preeclampsia

Clinical Trials on sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings