Fourth-generation Immucillin Derivative DI4G Associated Therapy in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

September 25, 2017 updated by: Fernanda V Prates, MD, MSc, Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos

Transition-state Analog Inhibitor of Human Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase as an Adjunct in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Therapy: a Randomized and Controlled Trial

A clinical trial to asses efficacy and safety of Transition-state Analog Inhibitor of Human Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase for topical use associated standard antimonial in the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Bahia, Brazil.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in Brazil with pentavalent antimony is associated with a high rate of failure, reaching up to 45% of cases. Additionally, pentavalent antimony is only administered by parenteral route with important toxicity and ulcer lesion healing takes a long time, from 2 to 3 months.

So, this randomized and controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of standard antimonial (20mg/day /kg for 20 days) associated with Transition-state Analog Inhibitor of Human Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase for topical use versus standard antimonial (20mg/kg/day for 20 days) associated with placebo for topical use in the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Early Cutaneous Leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in the endemic area of Corte de Pedra, Bahia, Brazil.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Bahia
      • Corte de Pedra, Bahia, Brazil, 40000
        • Corte de Pedra Health Post

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed (untreated) cutaneous leishmaniasis or early cutaneous leishmaniasis with localized lesions and a positive culture or diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods or by intradermal skin testing (Montenegro test).
  • Number of lesions: 1 to 3 ulcerative lesions.
  • Lesion´s diameter: 1 to 5 cm.
  • Disease duration: up to three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase >3 times upper limit of normal range
  • Serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen >1.5 times upper limit of normal range
  • Evidence of serious underlying disease (cardiac, renal, hepatic or pulmonary)
  • Immunodeficiency or antibody to HIV
  • Any non-compensated or uncontrolled condition, such as active tuberculosis, malignant disease, severe malaria, HIV, or other major infectious diseases
  • Lactation, pregnancy (to be determined by adequate test) or inadequate contraception in females of childbearing potential for treatment period plus 2 months
  • Negative parasitology (aspirate/biopsy/PCR) or negative Montenegro test
  • Any history of prior anti-leishmania therapy
  • Any condition which compromises ability to comply with the study procedures
  • Lack of ability or willingness to give informed consent (patient and/or parent / legal representative)
  • Anticipated non-availability for study visits/procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Immucillin DI4G
Meglumine Antimoniate by intravenous route at 20mg/kg/day during 20 days + Immucillin DI4G 2% by topical use once a day at the ulcer for 20 days .
Drug: Immucillin DI4G
Immucillin DI4G was administered by topical use at 2% concentration once a day for 20 days associated with Meglumine antimoniate administered by intravenous route at a dosage of 20mg/kg/day, during 20 days.
Other Names:
  • Fourth-generation Immucillin Derivative
Active Comparator: Meglumine Antimoniate
Meglumine Antimoniate by intravenous route at 20mg/kg/day during 20 days + placebo for topical use once a day at the ulcer for 20 days.
Drug: Meglumine antimoniate
Placebo for topical use once a day at the ulcer for 20 days associated with Meglumine antimoniate administered as the standard treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis by intravenous route at a dosage of 20mg/kg/day, during 20 days.
Other Names:
  • Glucantime

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cure rate or complete cicatrization of the ulcer.
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment

Bidirectional measurements of ulcers will be taken of the patients' lesions at the initial visit, and at each follow-up visit with standardized caliper. The area involved will be calculated as the product of the two measurements.

All lesions will be categorized as either active or healed (cured) at follow-up visits. Only lesions with complete re-epithelialization, without raised borders, infiltrations or crusts will be considered healed. Evaluation of the lesions will be performed by 2 clinicians who will be unaware of the group assignment of all patients.
6 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initial cure rate or complete cicatrization of the ulcer.
Time Frame: 2 months after treatment

Bidirectional measurements of ulcers will be taken of the patients' lesions at the initial visit, and at each follow-up visit with standardized caliper. The area involved will be calculated as the product of the two measurements.

All lesions will be categorized as either active or healed (cured) at follow-up visits. Only lesions with complete re-epithelialization, without raised borders, infiltrations or crusts will be considered healed. Evaluation of the lesions will be performed by 2 clinicians who will be unaware of the group assignment of all patients.
2 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Federal University of Bahia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Edgar M Carvalho, MD, PhD, Federal University of Bahia
  • Study Chair: Paulo RL Machado, MD, PhD, Federal University of Bahia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Immucillin DI4GTrial

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leishmaniasis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings