Circulating Cell-free DNA-based Epigenetic Biomarker MSEPT9 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection in Cirrhosis (SEPT9-CROSS)

January 12, 2025 updated by: OUSSALAH Abderrahim, MD, PhD, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Circulating Cell-free DNA-based Epigenetic Biomarker MSEPT9 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Among Cirrhotic Patients: the SEPT9-CROSS Study

Prospective evaluation of the circulating cell-free DNA-based epigenetic biomarker (mSEPT9) through a cross-sectional biomarker phase II design. The aim of the SEPT9-CROSS study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the plasma mSEPT9 biomarker in a large-scale study of 639 cirrhotic patients recruited in the participating centers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Epigenetic alterations are a common hallmark of human cancer. Single epigenetic markers are starting to be incorporated into clinical practice; however, the translational use of these biomarkers has not been validated at the 'omics' level. This is strikingly the case in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which represent the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been widely used as a diagnostic marker of HCC; however, according to international guidelines (AASLD, EASL), AFP is unsufficiently sensitive or unsufficiently specific for use in a screening assay. Aberrantly methylated DNA sequences frequently occur in tumors and are detected in the circulation of cancer patients by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). SEPT9 is a significant epi-driver gene in liver carcinogenesis. The SEPT9 gene is a key regulator of cell division and tumor suppressor whose hypermethylation is associated with carcinogenesis. SEPT9 is involved in the onset of rat hepatocarcinogenesis and SEPT9-promoter hypermethylation was reported in HCC in man. SEPT9 expression is turned on in cells throughout the body and absent or diminished by aberrant promoter methylation in several types of cancer. Through an initial proof-of-concept pilot study from France and an independent replication study from Germany, we showed that the circulating cell-free DNA methylation-based epigenetic biomarker mSEPT9 is a promising plasma biomarker for diagnosing HCC in cirrhotic patients. The aim of the SEPT9-CROSS study is to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarker in a large-scale study of 630 cirrhotic patients recruited in the participating centers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
529

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54511
        • University Hospital of Nancy (CHRU de Nancy)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Patient aged 18 and over.
  • Patient with a diagnosis of cirrhosis (alcohol, HBV, HBC, NASH, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis) with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (for each arm).
  • Affiliation to the French Social Security System (Health Insurance)

NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR CASES :

  • Malignant liver tumor other than HCC: cholangiocarcinoma, hepatic metastasis of a carcinoma (e.g., colorectal adenocarcinoma);
  • History of HCC treated by surgical resection, focal destruction [radiofrequency, stereotactic radiotherapy (CYBERKNIFE®)], arterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization within the last five years.

NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR CASES AND CONTROLS:

  • Legal protection measures;
  • Pregnant woman;
  • Hemodialysis, ongoing (possibility of interference with the test);
  • Presence of associated cancer (e.g., colorectal adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, breast carcinoma, etc.) since less than five years;
  • Presence of a hematological malignancy (no time limit).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HCC-free cirrhotic patients (Controls)
Cirrhotic patients enrolled in an HCC screening program by abdominal ultrasound and AFP every six months and followed at the Department of Hepatology of the University Hospital of Nancy. Each patient included will undergo a diagnostic test called "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany) also known as Plasma mSEPT9 test.
Diagnostic test: "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" test from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany)
The mSEPT9 assay consists of DNA extraction from plasma, bisulfite conversion of DNA, purification of bis-DNA, and real-time PCR.
Other Names:
  • Plasma mSEPT9 test
Experimental: HCC-positive cirrhotic patients (Cases)
Cirrhotic patients followed at the Department of Hepatology of the University Hospital of Nancy who presents an HCC according to the AASLD guidelines. Each patient included will undergo a diagnostic test called "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany) also known as Plasma mSEPT9 test.
Diagnostic test: "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" test from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany)
The mSEPT9 assay consists of DNA extraction from plasma, bisulfite conversion of DNA, purification of bis-DNA, and real-time PCR.
Other Names:
  • Plasma mSEPT9 test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Time Frame: The diagnosis of HCC will be based on overall patient's evaluation including clinical, biological and imaging workup which will be carried out during the consultation and/or the three months preceding or following the inclusion consultation.
The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma will be based on the guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (Hepatology. 2011;53:1020-2). The adjudicating physicians will be blinded to patient results associated with the mSEPT9 test.
The diagnosis of HCC will be based on overall patient's evaluation including clinical, biological and imaging workup which will be carried out during the consultation and/or the three months preceding or following the inclusion consultation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of early hepatocellular carcinoma. Early hepatocellular carcinoma will be defined as a tumor smaller than 30 mm according to Kudo M (Liver Cancer. 2013;2:69-72).
Time Frame: The diagnosis will be based on an overall patient's evaluation including clinical, biological and imaging workup which will be carried out during the consultation and/or the three months preceding or following the inclusion consultation.
The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma will be based on the guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (Hepatology. 2011;53:1020-2). The adjudicating physicians will be blinded to patient results associated with the mSEPT9 test.
The diagnosis will be based on an overall patient's evaluation including clinical, biological and imaging workup which will be carried out during the consultation and/or the three months preceding or following the inclusion consultation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation
Epigenomics, Inc
New Day Diagnostics

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Abderrahim OUSSALAH, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Nancy, INSERM UMR_S 1256, Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-A01885-48

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Final report, publication in a peer review journal. Main data and supplemental data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Final report after data completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After the publication of study results.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings