Effect of Photodymamic Therapy With Urucum and LED in the Reduction of Halitosis

May 1, 2018 updated by: Marcela Leticia Leal Gonçalves, University of Nove de Julho

Effect of Photodymamic Therapy With Urucum and LED in the Reduction of Halitosis: a Clinical and Microbiological Trial

Halitosis, also known as bad breath, is a term used to define an unpleasant and foul odor that emanates from the mouth and may have local or systemic origin. This project aims to observe the presence of halitosis and to verify if the treatment with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) is effective against it. The investigators will select 45 students or UNINOVE employees, from 18 to 25 years old, with a diagnosis of halitosis, presenting sulfite (SH2) ≥ 112 ppb on gas chromatography. Patients will be randomly divided into 3 groups of 15, which will receive different treatments: Group 1: treatment with tongue scraper; Group 2: aPDT applied in the back region and middle third of the tongue; Group 3: combined treatment of tongue scraper and aPDT. For the aPDT we will use urucum manipulated in the concentration of 20% (Fórmula e Ação®) in spray, to be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the middle third and back of the tongue (5 sprinkles) for 5 minutes for incubation, associated with a LED (Valo Cordless Ultradent®). 6 points will be irradiated on the back of the tongue with a distance of 1 cm between the points, considering the halo of light scattering and effectiveness of aPDT. The apparatus shall be precalibrated at wavelength 440-480nm for 60 seconds per point, irradiance of 450mW/cm and the light shall be irradiated so that a halo of 2cm diameter is formed per point. The results of the halimetry will be compared before and immediately after the treatment, besides the microbiological analysis of the tongue coating, before and after the treatment. The normality of the data will be measured using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and in the case of normality the Variance Analysis (ANOVA) test will be applied, and in the case of non-parametric data, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used. To analyze the results of each treatment in both periods of the study, the Wilcoxon test will be used.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01504-001
        • Recruiting
        • UNINOVE
        • Contact:
          • Marcela LL Gonçalves, MS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 25 years;
  • Sulphide (SH2) ≥ 112 ppb in the gas chromatography.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dentofacial anomalies (such as cleft lip and cleft palate);
  • Undergoing orthodontic and/or orthopedic treatment;
  • Undergoing oncological treatment;
  • Systemic alterations (gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic);
  • Treatment with antibiotics up to 1 month before the survey;
  • Pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Tongue scraper group (Group 1)
Fifteen patients will be included in this group. Tongue scraping will be performed by the same operator in all patients. Posterior-anterior movements will be performed with the scraper over the lingual dorsum, followed by cleaning the scraper with a gauze. This procedure will be performed ten times in each patient, in order to standardize the mechanical removal of the tongue coating.
Other: Tongue Scraping
Tongue scraping will be performed by the same operator in all patients. Posterior-anterior movements will be performed with the scraper over the lingual dorsum, followed by cleaning the scraper with a gauze. This procedure will be performed ten times in each patient, in order to standardize the mechanical removal of the tongue coating.
EXPERIMENTAL: aPDT group (Group 2)
Fifteen patients will be included in this group. One session of aPDT will be performed with the photosensitizer (PS) urucum manipulated at a concentration of 20% (Fórmula e Ação®) in spray, to be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the middle third and back of the tongue (5 sprinkles) for 5 minutes for incubation. The excess will be removed with a sucker in order to keep the surface wet with the PS itself, without using water. Six points with a distance of 1 cm between them will be irradiated, considering the halo of light scattering and effectiveness of aPDT. The apparatus shall be precalibrated at wavelength 440-480nm for 60 seconds per point, irradiance of 450mW/cm and the light shall be irradiated so that a halo of 2cm diameter is formed per point.
Radiation: aPDT
One session of aPDT will be performed with the photosensitizer (PS) urucum manipulated at a concentration of 20% (Fórmula e Ação®) in spray, to be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the middle third and back of the tongue (5 sprinkles) for 5 minutes for incubation. The excess will be removed with a sucker in order to keep the surface wet with the PS itself, without using water. Six points with a distance of 1 cm between them will be irradiated, considering the halo of light scattering and effectiveness of aPDT. The apparatus shall be precalibrated at wavelength 440-480nm for 60 seconds per point, irradiance of 450mW/cm and the light shall be irradiated so that a halo of 2cm diameter is formed per point.
EXPERIMENTAL: Tongue scraper and aPDT (Group 3)
Tongue scraping will be performed by the same operator in all patients. Posterior-anterior movements will be performed with the scraper over the lingual dorsum, followed by cleaning the scraper with a gauze. This procedure will be performed ten times in each patient, in order to standardize the mechanical removal of the tongue coating. After, one session of aPDT will be performed with the photosensitizer (PS) urucum manipulated at a concentration of 20% (Fórmula e Ação®) in spray, to be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the middle third and back of the tongue (5 sprinkles) for 5 minutes for incubation. Six points with a distance of 1 cm between them will be irradiated, considering the halo of light scattering and effectiveness of aPDT. The apparatus shall be precalibrated at wavelength 440-480nm for 60 seconds per point, irradiance of 450mW/cm and the light shall be irradiated so that a halo of 2cm diameter is formed per point.
Radiation: Tongue scraper and aPDT
Tongue scraping will be performed by the same operator in all patients. Posterior-anterior movements will be performed with the scraper over the lingual dorsum, followed by cleaning the scraper with a gauze. This procedure will be performed ten times in each patient, in order to standardize the mechanical removal of the tongue coating. After, one session of aPDT will be performed with the photosensitizer (PS) urucum manipulated at a concentration of 20% (Fórmula e Ação®) in spray, to be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the middle third and back of the tongue (5 sprinkles) for 5 minutes for incubation. Six points with a distance of 1 cm between them will be irradiated, considering the halo of light scattering and effectiveness of aPDT. The apparatus shall be precalibrated at wavelength 440-480nm for 60 seconds per point, irradiance of 450mW/cm and the light shall be irradiated so that a halo of 2cm diameter is formed per point.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Halimetry (gas chromatography)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Oral air collection will follow the manufacturer's guidelines (Oral ChromaTM Manual Instruction) where the participant will be instructed to rinse with cysteine (10 mM) for 1 minute, then remain with his/her mouth closed for 1 minute. A syringe from the same manufacturer for collection of mouth air will be introduced into the patient's mouth. During 1 minute the patient will remain closed mouth, breathing through the nose, without touching the syringe with the tongue. The plunger will be pulled out, we will re-empty the syringe air into the patient's mouth and again pull the plunger to fill the syringe with the breath sample. We will wipe the tip of the syringe with gauze to remove moisture from the saliva, place the gas injection needle in the syringe, and adjust the plunger to 0.5 ml. The gases collected at the entrance door of the appliance are injected in a single movement. This procedure will be done before and immediately after treatment.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiological analysis of tongue coating
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
The microbiological analysis of tongue coating will be performed by collecting biofilm samples from the region of the lingual dorsum with a 1μl inoculation loop. Samples will be transferred into individual vials containing 1.5 ml of reduced transport fluid and vortexed for approximately 30 seconds. After homogenisation, the ten-fold dilution series will be prepared in 180μl sterile PBS solution and 10-2, 10-3, 10-4 and 10-5 aliquots, transferred to BHI agar plates. Considering that the main bacteria responsible for the production of CSV are Gram-negative and anaerobic, plaques will be incubated in an anaerobic jar for 72 h at 370 C, for counting of the colony-forming units (CFU) and comparison of the numbers before and immediately after treatment.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nove de Julho

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marcela LL Gonçalves, MS, University of Nove de Julho

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 5, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 5, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 15, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HALIURU

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings