Integrated Cognitive, Sensory, and Motor Rehabilitation of Hand Functions (INCOGNITO)

November 21, 2017 updated by: Dr. Franco Molteni, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center
This study evaulates the addition to the standard theraphy of enriched sensorimotor training by means of robotic glove therapy, or functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of chronic stroke patients with upper limb motor impairments. All the patients receive the conventional physiotherapic treatment. Supplemental to the conventional treatment, patients are evenly split in four groups to provide different treatments for an equivalent amount of time. Patient in the first group receive supplemental conventional therapy; patients in the second group receive robotic glove therapy; patients in the third group receive functional electrical stimulation; patients in the fourth group receive robotic glove treatment and functional electrical stimulation in different sessions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Stroke very frequently impacts on patients' motor function, and particularly on upper limb movements. Limited hand functionality is a major negative outcome after stroke, negatively affecting patients' recovery and independence, with major impact on rehabilitation.However, standard motor rehabilitation outcome is often suboptimal, because insufficient or non-specific treatment is provided. Robotic hand mobilization and functiona electrical stimulation grasp rehabilitation each improve motor capabilities in grasp impaired patients, but they do so by different mechanisms.

Robotic hand mobilization achieves grasp rehabilitation by providing passive mobilization of the affected limb if the subject does not react to the designed task.

Functional electrical stimulation achieves grasp rehabilitation by inducing localized muscle contraction, that is by providing an electrical field able to stimulate both sensory afferent pathways and lower motor neurons in the targeted volume.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Lecco
      • Costa Masnaga, Lecco, Italy, 23845
        • Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults male and/or female, older than 18 years
  • Patients who have suffered one or more strokes with major unilateral functional impairment
  • Hemiplegic, left and right unilateral lesion
  • Chronic phase of stroke at least six months before study enrollment
  • Level of impairment: hand and/or arm
  • No left handed
  • Mini-Mental State Examination > 20

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limitation for using the device due to impairment of Passive Range of Motion and/or
  • Pain due to Spasticity evaluated using Modified Ashworth Scale (>=3)
  • Previous history of major neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • allergy to electrodes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional Therapy
27 sessions, 3 sessions per week for a total of 9 weeks. Each session lasts about 90 minutes and consists of different standard motor training modalities typically used in the rehabilitation of the arm after stroke. The training session is customized on the patients' need and can be adapted to their improvement during the intervention.
Device: Conventional Therapy
EXPERIMENTAL: Robotic Glove
Robotic Glove & Conventional Therapy 27 sessions, 3 sessions per week for a total of 9 weeks. Each session consists of 30-minute training with the robotic glove system plus 60 minutes of conventional therapy. The training session is customized on the patients' need and can be adapted to their improvement during the intervention.
Device: Robotic Glove
EXPERIMENTAL: Electrical Stimulation
Electrical Stimulation & Conventional Therapy 27 sessions, 3 sessions per week for a total of 9 weeks. Each session consists of 30-minute training with the electrical stimulation system plus 60 minutes of conventional therapy. The training session is customized on the patients' need and can be adapted to their improvement during the intervention.
Device: Electrical Stimulation
EXPERIMENTAL: Electrical Stimulation and Robotic Glove
Electrical Stimulation & Robotic Glove & Conventional Therapy 27 sessions, 3 sessions per week for a total of 9 weeks. Each session consists of 30-minute training with the electrical stimulation system plus 60 minutes of conventional therapy or 30-minute training with the robotic glove system plus 60 minutes of conventional therapy. Half of the sessions are allocated to the electrical stimulation system, and half are allocated to the robotic glove system. The training session is customized on the patients' need and can be adapted to their improvement during the intervention.
Device: Electrical Stimulation
Device: Robotic Glove

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motricity Index
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Outcome measure to evaluate motor impairment after stroke; subscale for arm only; the subscale ranges from 0 (maximal impairment) to 100 (no impairment).
9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks.

19-items outcome measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from:

  • 3: Performs test normally
  • 2: Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty
  • 1: Performs test partially
  • 0: Can perform no part of test
baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks.
Medical Research Council
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks, 13 weeks.

A standardized assessment to measure muscle strength; Score range 0-5 (minimum 0, maximum 5)

  • 3: Performs test normally
  • 2: Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty
  • 1: Performs test partially
  • 0: Can perform no part of test
baseline, 9 weeks, 13 weeks.
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks.
Semi-structured interview to assess arm function. Individuals are asked to rate Quality of Movement and Amount of Movement during 30 daily functional tasks. Target tasks include object manipulation (e.g. pen, fork, comb, and cup) as well as the use of the arm during gross motor activities (e.g. transferring to a car, steadying oneself during standing, pulling a chair into a table while sitting). Items scored on a 6-point ordinal scale (0 not used, 6 as good as before).
baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks.
Box & Blocks Test
Time Frame: baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks.
It assesses unilateral gross manual dexterity. Individuals are seated at a table, facing a rectangular box that is divided into two square compartments of equal dimension by means of a partition. One hundred and fifty, 2.5 cm, colored, wooden cubes or blocks are placed in one compartment or the other. The individual is instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment to the other for a period of 60 seconds.To administer the test, the examiner is seated opposite the individual in order to observe test performance. The test is scored by counting the number of blocks carried over the partition from one compartment to the other during the one-minute trial period. Both arms are tested.
baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks
It measures spasticity. It consists of a test resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. Scores range from 0-5; a score of 0 indicates no resistance, 5 indicates rigidity. Target muscles: Wrist flexor and extensor, fingers and thumb flexor and extensor
baseline; 9 weeks; 13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INCOGNITO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Electrical Stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings