Effect of Motor Cortex Versus Sacral Magnetic Stimulation in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Urinary Tract Dysfunction

February 14, 2018 updated by: May Maged Abdel-Salhin, Cairo University

Effect of Motor Cortex Magnetic Stimulation Versus Sacral Magnetic Stimulation in Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

This work is intended to assess the effect of repetitive magnetic stimulation on the sacral roots versus repetitive magnetic stimulation on motor cortex in multiple sclerosis patients with the lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Twenty Multiple sclerosis patients with lower urinary tract symptoms will be receiving repetitive magnetic stimulation on sacral roots. Another twenty Multiple sclerosis patient with lower urinary tract symptoms will be receiving repetitive magnetic stimulation on motor cortex. Treatment outcome will be assessed and compared between the two groups.

Twenty trains of 50 stimuli at 5 Hz (train duration: 10 seconds) separated by a 40-second pause were delivered for a total of 1000 pulses (total duration: 16 minutes) once a day for four consecutive days for two weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple Sclerosis patients (diagnosed by McDonald criteria 2010) with lower urinary tract dysfunction
  • Adults more than 18 years
  • Unresponsiveness to medical treatment
  • Urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor overactivity and/or detrusor underactivity and/or detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urinary tract infections
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Sacral magnetic stimulation
Twenty trains of 50 stimuli at 5 Hz (train duration: 10 seconds) separated by a 40-second pause were delivered for a total of 1000 pulses, once a day for four consecutive days for two weeks, over sacral roots
Other: magnetic stimulation
Twenty trains of 50 stimuli at 5 Hz (train duration: 10 seconds) separated by a 40-second pause were delivered for a total of 1000 pulses, once a day for four consecutive days for two weeks
Active Comparator: Cortical magnetic stimulation
Twenty trains of 50 stimuli at 5 Hz (train duration: 10 seconds) separated by a 40-second pause were delivered for a total of 1000 pulses, once a day for four consecutive days for two weeks, over motor cortex
Other: magnetic stimulation
Twenty trains of 50 stimuli at 5 Hz (train duration: 10 seconds) separated by a 40-second pause were delivered for a total of 1000 pulses, once a day for four consecutive days for two weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline King's Health QoL questionnaire score after treatment
Time Frame: 1-7 days after treatment

questionnaire evaluates the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on patient's quality of life.

High scores represent a worse quality of life, with no cut-off values.
1-7 days after treatment
Change from baseline Post-void residual urine after treatment
Time Frame: 1-7 days after treatment
Measured by ultrasound It is the volume of urine left in the bladder at the completion of micturition Measured in milliliters (mL)
1-7 days after treatment
Change from baseline Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) after treatment
Time Frame: 1-7 days after treatment
Measured by urodynamic evaluation Measured in millimeters (mL) It is the volume at which the patient states that he/she can no longer delay micturition because of strong desire to void or urgency
1-7 days after treatment
Change from baseline Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax) after treatment
Time Frame: 1-7 days after treatment
Measured by urodynamic evaluation Measured in milliliters per second (mL/sec) It is the maximum measured value of the flow rate
1-7 days after treatment
Change from baseline Detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate (Pdet @Qmax) after treatment
Time Frame: 1-7 days after treatment
Measured by urodynamic evaluation Measured in centimeter water (cmH2O) It represents the effect of the active and/or passive forces generated by the detrusor muscle
1-7 days after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 30091981

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on magnetic stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings