Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Vs Conventional Open Technique

March 23, 2026 updated by: European Institute of Oncology

Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy And Immediate Robotic Breast Reconstruction Vs Conventional Open Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating Patients Satisfaction

This trial is designed to compare robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with conventional open technique. It is a prospective randomized trial evaluating patients satisfaction

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

High proportion of patients with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer in Europe and US undergo to mastectomy. The absolute numbers of mastectomy rates in US is still today around 38% and represent one of the most performed operation for cancer reasons. Despite the lack of a natural cavity needed for endoscopic viewing, applications of robotic surgery have recently emerged for superficial organs such as in the fields of thyroidectomy, oropharyngeal surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, it has never been applied in breast cancer except for a feasibility and safety study conducted at European Institute of Oncology.

The technique was firstly published by Toesca et al. considering the first 3 cases. The same research as continued on breast cancer evaluating feasibility, reproducibility and safety studying 26 consecutive procedures of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction (article under peer to peer review at European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO). In these initial cases of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction authors found two main advantages such as the robotic optical vision and the minimal invasiveness. The two main limitations noticed in this initial experience were the duration of operating time and the additional costs related to the operation. The limitations of the applicability of robotic surgery to the breast, such as operating time and costs, might be offset by the advantages they observed such as better vision and minimally invasive approach with an anatomically more respectful mastectomy.

This project is a superiority trial comparing robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast robotic reconstruction with conventional open technique.

The primary end-point is to evaluate patient satisfaction. Second end-point is to compare post-operative outcome considering complications, post-operative pain, reduction of the average length of stay of patients, long term oncological outcome of the two different surgical techniques.

Patients will be randomized into two treatment arms:

A. Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant (Open NSM) B. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with implant (Robotic NSM) Both arms will undergo to the same pre-surgical staging, intra-operative axillary surgical staging, post-operative multidisciplinary evaluation and adjuvant treatments according to international and internal protocols.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20141
        • European Institute of Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive breast cancer, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Breast Related Cancer Antigens mutation carriers.
  • Any age
  • Candidates to nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
  • Negative preoperative assessment of nipple-areola complex
  • Absence of skin involvement
  • Low probability to have positivity of nipple-areola complex tissue intra-operative frozen section
  • Breast volume ≤ Bra IV; from cup A to D
  • No hard smoking (hard smoking defined as >20 cigarettes/day)
  • Low and intermediate risk for anesthesia (ASA Scale)
  • Written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion
  • Patients must be accessible for follow-up

Exclusion criteria:

  • Previous thoracic radiation therapy for any reason
  • Inflammatory Breast Cancer
  • Skin involvement
  • Pre-operative diagnosis (radiological or cytological) of nipple-areola complex disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study
  • Uncompensated Diabetes Mellitus
  • Hard smokers (hard smoking defined as >20 cigarettes/day)
  • High risk for anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Open NSM
Conventional Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant
Experimental: Robotic NSM
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Surgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year
The BREAST-Q survey is used to detect differences in patient satisfaction among the groups
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Overall survival
5 years
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Disease free survival
5 years
Average length of stay of patients
Time Frame: 1 month
Reduction of the average length of stay of patients of the two different surgical techniques.
1 month
Post operative complications
Time Frame: 1 month
Compare post operative complications (pain, skin or nipple-areola injury or necrosis or infection, hematoma, seroma)
1 month
Cumulative incidence of local recurrence
Time Frame: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of local recurrence
5 years
Cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences
Time Frame: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences
5 years
Cumulative incidence of distant recurrences
Time Frame: 5 years
Cumulative incidence of distant recurrences
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo Veronesi, MD, European Institute of Oncology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R 530/16- IEO 562

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Open NSM

Search Similar Trials