MedStar Diabetes Pathway Chart Reviews (MedstarBC2)

October 16, 2020 updated by: Michelle Magee, Medstar Health Research Institute

Expanded MedStar Diabetes Pathway Ongoing Chart Review Protocol

The MedStar Diabetes Pathway (MDP) is transitioning into a clinical program offered at various MedStar sites. The MDP clinical team is reviewing the data collected during the pilot to improve the program and adapt it to various clinical settings in order to better serve the target patient population. It is imperative to continue reviewing patient clinical outcomes as the program expands in order to insure continuous quality improvement of the program. This will be achieved through chart reviews of patients receiving diabetes care via the MDP and comparison with patients received diabetes standard of care through their primary care physician.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The MedStar Diabetes Pathway (MDP) early pilot program has generated evidence that an innovative technology-enabled "Boot Camp" approach to the delivery of diabetes survival skills education and medication management has a significant impact on glycemic control and healthcare utilization measures. The MDP is a 12 week Diabetes "Boot Camp" technology-enabled intervention which will offer learner-centered survival skills self-management education (DSSE) and algorithm-driven diabetes medications (DM) titration by Endocrinologist-supervised Certified Diabetes Educators (CDE), NPs and PharmDs. The program has been offered at 5 MedStar Medical Group (MMG) Primary Care Practices from November 2014 to February 2016 to high risk adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who have a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) level -a marker of average blood glucose (BG) levels in the 2-3 months prior to the time the test is done- which is at or above 9% - considered to be poor control, and 1 or more additional risk factors for poor health outcomes. The program has been well received by MedStar Primary Care Providers and their diabetes patients. Patients that participated in the MDP achieved significantly higher A1C reduction and decreased risk risk for acute care utilization then matched controls that received standard of care. The pilot evidence demonstrated a significant impact on glycemic control and healthcare utilization measures as the result of a concise, focused DM education and medication management intervention. Building on the success of the MDP Phase 1.0 pilot, the next steps in expanding the program will be as follows:

  • Transition of the Pathway from early feasibility pilot to the next phase as an expanded pilot program integrated within the MedStar Health System care delivery network and built upon a sustainable infrastructure across early adopter MMG practice sites.
  • Expand recruitment to include high risk patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, including those with a new diagnosis and A1C >9%, who have MedStar Emergency Department and/or Inpatient encounters
  • Spread to additional targeted MedStar Primary Care Practices and/or to MedStar Managed Care Plan participants.

Chart reviews and data collection during the expansion phase will be essential to guide the process and allow rapid cycle adjustments to maximize the impact of the program and utilization of resources for the benefit of our patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
826

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes that meet inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes, A1C equal or higher than 9%, active patient of medstar health provider, english speaking, willing and able to participate in the program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A1C less than 9%, severe illness that precludes participation such severe congestive heart failure or COPD, advanced kidney disease, recent acute illness such as heart attack or stroke in the past 30 days, active cancer, severe mental illness, high dose steroid, other types of diabetes, pregnant or lactating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Cases
patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus that participate in the MedStar Diabetes Pathway
Other: Intensive diabetes education and medication management
Patients receive intensive knowledge based diabetes education and algorithm driven medication management over a period of 12 weeks.
Matched controls
patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes that match the cases on 5 criteria and received standard of care diabetes management with a MedStar provider

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in A1C
Time Frame: 12-16 weeks
Change in Hemoglobin A1C from baseline to 12-16 weeks for both cases and controls
12-16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk for Emergency Room Visits at 30 Days From Baseline as Measured by Incidence Risk Ratio
Time Frame: 30 days
Comparison of risk of incurring an emergency room visits at 30 days from baseline for cases and controls. This was done by calculating and comparing the incidence risk ratio for an ER visit for each group and comparing them.
30 days
Risk for Hospitalizations at 30 Days From Baseline
Time Frame: 30 days
Comparison of risk for experiencing a hospital visit within 30 days from baseline in both group. This was done by calculating the incidence risk ratio for hospitalizations for cases and controls at 30 days from baseline and comparing them.
30 days
Risk for Composite of Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations at 30 Days From Baseline
Time Frame: 30 days
Comparison for risk of experiencing a visit to the emergency room and/or the hospital at 30 days from baseline. This was measured by calculating the Incidence risk ratio for acute care utilization at 30 days from baseline for both cases and controls and comparing them.
30 days
Risk for Emergency Room Visits at 90 Days From Baseline
Time Frame: 90 days
Comparison of the risk of experiencing an emergency room visit at 90 days from baseline in both groups. This was done by calculating the Incidence risk ratio for an emergency room visit at 90 days for both cases and controls and comparing them
90 days
Risk for Hospitalizations at 90 Days From Baseline
Time Frame: 90 days
Comparison of the risk for experiencing a hospitalization within 90 days from baseline in both groups. This was done by calculating the Incidence Risk Ratio for hospitalizations for cases and controls within 90 days of baseline and comparing them.
90 days
Composite of Risk for Hospitalizations and Emergency Room Visits Within 90 Days From Baseline
Time Frame: 90 days
Comparison of the risk for experiencing a hospitalization and/or emergency room visit within 90 days from baseline for both groups. This was done by calculating then comparing the incidence risk ratio for acute care utilization within 90 days from baseline for cases and controls.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medstar Health Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016-143

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Intensive diabetes education and medication management

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings