Validation of the Spasticity Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQOL-6D)

September 27, 2019 updated by: Ipsen

Psychometric Validation Study of the Spasticity Quality of Life 6-Dimensions (SQOL-6D) in Upper-limb Spasticity

The purpose of the study is to describe the psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness) of the SQOL-6D instrument in the context of routine clinical treatment of upper limb spasticity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study qualifies as interventional not because of the use of an investigational product, but because the imposed specific data collection procedures include multiple questionnaire assessments and one on-site visit not necessarily part of routine clinical practice.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
104

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Cottingham, United Kingdom, HU16 5JQ
        • Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Castle Hill Hospital
      • Dewsbury, United Kingdom, WF13 4HS
        • Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Dewsbury Hospital
      • Harrow, United Kingdom, HA1 3UJ
        • London North West NHS Healthcare Trust - Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit
      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE5 4PW
        • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Neurology Department, Leicester General Hospital
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE6 4QD
        • Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS trust, Walkergate Park Neuro-Rehabilitation
      • Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom, ST6 7AG
        • Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Partnership NHS Trust, North Staffordshire Rehabilitation Centre, Haywood Hospital
      • Sunderland, United Kingdom, SR4 7TP
        • City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust Research and Innovation Education Centre
      • Warwick, United Kingdom, CV34 6SR
        • South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Central England Rehabilitation Unit Leamington Spa Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently resident in the UK
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of ULS
  • Receiving a treatment at the enrolment visit, as part of their routine clinical management, aiming at reducing spasticity
  • Sufficient grasp of English and cognitive ability to be able to understand the SQOL-6D questions, give informed consent and complete the protocol requirements as judged by the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has already been included in the study
  • The subject, in the opinion of the investigator, would be unable to understand the questionnaire or to comply with the requirements of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: Data collection
An electronic data capture (EDC) system will be used to collect data in electronic format. Data will be collected at the enrolment visit, at the follow-up visit (8 weeks +/-2 weeks) and 1 to 4 days after the follow-up visit.
Other: Data collection
Subjects will be treated in accordance with usual medical practice during their participation in this study. No additional diagnostic or treatment procedures will be required. Subjects will be asked to complete electronic (or on paper when it's not possible to use electronic version) questionnaires.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation of SQOL-6D in upper limb spasticity
Time Frame: Change from baseline (day 1) to 8 weeks +/-2 weeks (follow up visit)
Validity - Reliability - Responsiveness
Change from baseline (day 1) to 8 weeks +/-2 weeks (follow up visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EQ-5D-5L (EuroQoL 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels)
Time Frame: Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
A summary index score will be calculated from responses given to the 5 domain items, measuring overall health on a scale 0 to 1 using United Kingdom (UK) value sets.
Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
Neurological Impairment Scale adapted for ULS (ULS-NIS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Records functional impairment on a four-point scale (rated 0-3) across seven domains, including: motor impairment in the affected upper limb, sensation affected in the affected upper limb, communication, cognitive function, cortical function, emotional/behaviour and mobility of joints, as measured by soft tissue shortening (an assessment used for the evaluation of the deterioration in range of movement due to spasticity by percentage loss of range).
Day 1
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
Six-point scale (with available scores of 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3 and 4) evaluates muscle tone by reporting changes in this during muscle flexion or extension, depending on the (resistance in) joint mobility being assessed (shoulder, elbow, wrist or finger).
Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
Gaseous (Goal Attainment Scaling Evaluation of Outcome for Upper-Limb Spasticity)
Time Frame: Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
Goal attainment will be recorded on a five point numerical scale (range -2 to +2) and goal scores combined to give an aggregated T score.
Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
ArmA (Arm Activity Measure) Scores
Time Frame: Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
ArmA is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire recording the difficulty in caring for, and completing tasks and activities with the affected arm. The ArmA contains a total of 29 items in four subscales. Difficulty for each item is assessed on a five-point scale (range 0 to 4).
Day 1 and then 8 weeks +/-2
Global assessment of benefit
Time Frame: 8 weeks +/-2
The Global Assessment of Benefit scale will be completed by the subject. Responses options will be: Much worse (-2)/Worse (-1)/Same (0)/Some benefit (+1)/Great benefit (+2).
8 weeks +/-2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ipsen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 25, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 9, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • F-FR-52120-232

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spasticity, Muscle

Clinical Trials on Data collection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings