VeClose Five Year Follow-Up Extension Study

April 10, 2019 updated by: Medtronic Endovascular

Follow-up of Patients Treated in VeClose Study (Five Years)

The VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study will seek to gain additional follow-up data from the patients enrolled in the VeClose study (NCT01807585).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study will continue to assess the safety and efficacy of the VenaSeal Closure System for the long term effect on closure of the great saphenous vein by conducting a follow-up visit at five years post index procedure/enrollment in the VeClose study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
114

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85255
        • Morrison Vein Institute
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92121
        • GBK Cosmetic Laser Dermatology
    • Colorado
      • Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States, 80111
        • Radiology Imaging Associates (RIA)
    • Illinois
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62701
        • Prairie Education & Research Cooperative
    • Maryland
      • Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States, 21030
        • MD Laser Skin & Vein Institute
    • New York
      • North Tonawanda, New York, United States, 14120
        • Vein Institute of Buffalo
    • Oregon
      • Bend, Oregon, United States, 97701
        • Inovia Vein Speciality Center
    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23452
        • Sentara Vascular Specialists
    • Washington
      • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004
        • Lake Washington Vascular

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects currently enrolled in both arms of the VeClose Study (NCT01807585) will be assessed for eligibility to enroll in the VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study. All subjects must meet the inclusion criteria and must not meet the exclusion criteria. Assessment of eligibility is based on data available to the investigator at the time of subject enrollment. The subject will be considered to be enrolled in the VeClose Five Year Follow-up Extension Study after the informed consent is signed/dated and all of the study eligibility criteria have been met.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Enrolled in the VeClose study.
  2. Able and willing to complete the required 5 year study visit including Duplex ultrasound exam.
  3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to study specific data collection.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Withdrew consent from the VeClose study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: VenaSeal SCS
Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). The VA is dispensed in small amounts with each pull of the trigger equaling 0.10 cc. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either VenaSeal SCS or to RFA at the time of enrollment into the VeClose study (NCT01807585).
Device: VenaSeal SCS
Non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant procedure that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein.
Other Names:
  • VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System
  • VSCS
Active Comparator: RFA
Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Heat is applied to the target vein using radiofrequency energy to ablate the target vein. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either VenaSeal SCS or to RFA at the time of enrollment into the VeClose study (NCT01807585).
Device: ClosureFast Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
Radiofrequency thermal ablation of the GSV using the Covidien ClosureFast system.
Other Names:
  • ClosureFast
Experimental: Roll-in (VenaSeal SCS)
Prior to initiation of the randomized cohort at each site for the VeClose study (NCT01807585), a non-randomized cohort of 2 subjects per site (roll-in phase) were enrolled and treated with VenaSeal SCS with endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). The VA is dispensed in small amounts with each pull of the trigger equaling 0.10 cc.
Device: Roll-In (VenaSeal SCS)
Non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant procedure that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein.
Other Names:
  • VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System
  • VSCS
  • Roll-in

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Closure of the Target Vein at 5 years after index treatment in the VeClose study (NCT01807585).
Time Frame: 5 years
Complete closure is defined as Doppler ultrasound examination showing closure along entire treated target vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5cm.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)
Time Frame: 5 years
Change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) at 5 years as compared to baseline data from the VeClose study (NCT01807585). The VCSS is an Investigator assessment of the severity of venous reflux disease, assessing signs and symptoms such as pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, induration and inflammation. The VCSS score is the sum of responses to 10 questions. Each question has a total possible of 3 points, which are then added for each question. The overall VCSS scores can therefore range from 0 (no venous disease) to 30 (severe venous disease). High scores indicate worse outcomes and "0" is the best possible outcome.
5 years
Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)
Time Frame: 5 years
Change in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) at 5 years as compared to baseline data from the VeClose study (NCT01807585). AVVQ is a disease-specific 13-item questionnaire used to assess the impact of varicose veins on the quality of life, such as pain caused by varicose veins, and need to take painkilling tablets for varicose veins as well as assessing the presence of signs/symptoms such as ankle swelling, purple discoloration and rash/eczema. The total score of AVVQ is the sum of all questions for each leg. Scores range from 0 (no disease) to 100 (maximal disease). High scores indicate worse outcomes and "0" is the best possible outcome.
5 years
Quality of Life survey (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 5 years
Change in Quality of Life survey (EQ-5D) at 5 years as compared to baseline data from the VeClose study (NCT01807585). EQ-5D is a short generic quality of life survey that is commonly used outside of the United States for health technology assessments. The "health state today" question provides an overall assessment along a 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) with a range from 0 ("worst imaginable health state") to 100 ("best imaginable health state").
5 years
CEAP classification ("clinical, etiology, assessment and pathophysiology")
Time Frame: 5 years
Standardized measure of the degree of venous insufficiency and secondary manifestations of venous disease as measured by the treating physician.
5 years
Satisfaction with Treatment
Time Frame: 5 years
Satisfaction with Treatment assessment consists of a brief 2-question patient survey rating satisfaction with treatment provided and whether the subject would undergo the assigned treatment again. The number (percent) of subjects on each level of satisfaction are summarized (Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied). The number (percent) of subjects for the second satisfaction question, "would undergo treatment again" were also summarized by response (Definitely have again, Might have again, Not have again).
5 years
Adverse events (AE) related to the target GSV
Time Frame: 5 years
AEs related to the GSV will be tabulated and reporting using the MedDRA dictionary, version 16.1.
5 years
Adjunctive procedures performed on the study limb
Time Frame: 5 years
Details of adjunctive procedures performed on the study limb will be captured on Case Report Forms (CRFs)
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medtronic Endovascular

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nick Morrison, MD, Morrison Vein Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CP-1011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) With Venous Reflux Disease

Clinical Trials on VenaSeal SCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings