A Novel Transition Program to Reduce Disability After Stroke (COMPASS)

August 25, 2025 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

COMPASS: A Novel Transition Program to Reduce Disability After Stroke

This study evaluates a program designed to help individuals transition home from inpatient rehabilitation following an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Half of the participants will receive a stroke education program while the other half will receive an environmental modifications program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A gap in care exists at the point of transition from inpatient rehabilitation (IR) to home, when survivors encounter new environmental barriers due to the cognitive and sensorimotor sequelae of stroke. Resolving these barriers and improving independence in the community have potential to significantly improve stroke survivors' long-term morbidity. The proposed study investigates the efficacy and safety of a novel enhanced rehabilitation-transition program to reduce environmental barriers and improve daily activity performance and community participation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
185

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63108
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged ≥50 years
  • acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis
  • independent ADLs prior to stroke (premorbid Modified Rankin Scale Score ≤2)
  • plan to discharge to home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe terminal systemic disease that limits life expectancy to < 6 months
  • previous disorder (e.g. dementia) that makes interpretation of the self-rated scales difficult or Short Blessed Test (SBT) score of 10 or less (indicating significant cognitive impairment)
  • moderate to severe Aphasia as determined by the NIHSS Best Language rating of 2 or more
  • reside in congregate living facility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: COMPASS
COMPASS is a complex intervention that combines 2 evidence-based treatment strategies at a new point of care (transition from inpatient rehabilitation). The objective of home visits by an occupational therapy (OT) practitioner is to remediate barriers in the home and community that influence daily activities and community participation. The treatment will include a set of 1 predischarge and four 75-minute postdischarge visits. The intervention is followed by 2 booster sessions.
Behavioral: COMPASS
The data from the baseline assessment will be used to develop an environmental modification intervention plan. Environmental modifications will be installed before discharge if possible. Problem areas addressed are participant specific (tailored), but the process to identify and address the target area is systematic. All participants will receive identical intervention components. The standardized components include assessment, identification of problematic activities (and environmental barriers), identification of three solutions (for each problem), implementation of solution set selected by the participant, training, and active practice of daily activities in one's own home and community.
Sham Comparator: Education program
An OT practitioner will deliver the program in accordance with "Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines for Stroke Survivors after Discharge Home." Topic order is determined by participants. Four 75-minute sessions will be provided. Topics may include stroke symptoms, risk factors and preventing stroke recurrence, nutrition, managing emotions, sleep, pain. Written materials from the National Stroke Association and the American Stroke Association are provided.
Behavioral: Stroke education
The control group will experience the same effects of time and attention in the home but no effect on the outcome of interest.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
The RNLI is a disability-related quality-of life-instrument used to measure participants' satisfaction with their home and community participation and has been validated on a population of community-dwelling individuals with chronic conditions. It uses an 11-item, 10 point scale, with higher scores indicating greater reintegration to normal living. The sum score is divided by 110 and then multiplied by 100 to obtain an adjusted score. Adjusted scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater reintegration to normal living.
Baseline and 12 months post-stroke

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) - Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Domain
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
The SIS is a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure that quantifies the impact of stroke on a client's life, via questionnaire. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) domain was used to measure daily activity performance. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less difficulty.
Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) - Activity Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) activity score measures current activity patterns of participants across 44 activities. The score ranges from 0 to 1.0, with a higher score indicating fewer problematic activities for the participant.
Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) - Performance Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) performance score is a mean rating of up to 10 participant-prioritized activities on a scale from 1 (unable to perform the activity at all) to 5 (able to perform the activity without difficulty). Higher mean scores indicate better functional ability to perform tasks without difficulty.
Baseline and 12 months post-stroke
In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) - Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-months post-stroke
The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) satisfaction score is a mean rating of up to 10 participant-prioritized activities on a scale of 1 (not satisfied at all with their performance of the activity) to 5 (very satisfied with their performance of the activity). Higher mean scores indicate more satisfaction with self-rated activity performance.
Baseline and 12-months post-stroke
In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) - Barrier Severity Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-months post-stroke
The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) barrier severity score is a total sum of barrier ratings (0=independent with/without a device, 1=stand-by assistance needed, 2=minimum assistance needed, 3=moderate assistance needed, 4=maximum assistance needed, 5=no activity ) for all identified barriers across up to 10 prioritized activities. Multiple barriers could be identified for each prioritized activity. Higher sum scores indicate a greater need for assistance/less independence for completion of functional activities. There is no maximum score.
Baseline and 12-months post-stroke

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Stark, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201705047
  • 1R01HD092398-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings