Use of Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Severe Obesity Undergoing Upper Endoscopy Procedures
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
Bristol, Connecticut, United States, 06010
- Bristol Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Weight loss surgery patients undergoing preoperative upper endoscopy
- BMI 40-60
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant patients
- Previous weight loss surgery or stomach surgery
- BMI > 60 and BMI < 40
- Active smokers
- Patients with a history of recent URTI (Upper Respiratory Tract Infection) within the preceding 2 weeks
- Lung disease, COPD asthma, cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis
- Baseline O2 saturation less than or equal to 94%
- Exclude substance abusers (active alcohol abuse, benzodiazepine abuse, and active illicit drug use)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Control
Intervention: nasal cannula (6L O2) + non invasive positive pressure nasal mask (not connected to machine)
|
If desaturation below 90 %, nasal cannula removed and non invasive positive pressure nasal mask connected to machine: Inspiratory pressure 12 cm H2O/Expiratory pressure 6 cm H2O which can be increased to meet a tidal volume (TV) of 300-800 mL (target is 450-500), with maximum Inspiratory pressure 18 cm H2O /Expiratory pressure 8 cm H2O on 100% FiO2.If TVs are more or less than 300 to 800 mL range, the pressure will be adjusted by 1-2 cm H2O) accordingly
If rescue non invasive positive pressure maneuver attempted (including adjustments in pressure) and O2 sat is not above 90 % within 3 min of starting non invasive positive pressure, scope removed and secondary rescue maneuver started.
Secondary rescue maneuvers performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist (chin lift, oral airway, bag mask, nasal trumpet, LMA, intubation).
If sat > 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, resumption of scope exam to the discretion of anesthesia.
If sat does not increase > 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, scope exam to be cancelled and patient care per anesthesiologist
|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Intervention: Non invasive positive pressure nasal mask (connect to machine once patient is sedated)
|
If rescue non invasive positive pressure maneuver attempted (including adjustments in pressure) and O2 sat is not above 90 % within 3 min of starting non invasive positive pressure, scope removed and secondary rescue maneuver started.
Secondary rescue maneuvers performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist (chin lift, oral airway, bag mask, nasal trumpet, LMA, intubation).
If sat > 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, resumption of scope exam to the discretion of anesthesia.
If sat does not increase > 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, scope exam to be cancelled and patient care per anesthesiologist
Inspiratory pressure 12 cm H2O/Expiratory pressure 6 cm H2O which can be increased to meet a tidal volume (TV) of 300-800 mL (target is 450-500), with maximum Inspiratory pressure 18 cm H2O /Expiratory pressure 8 cm H2O on 100% FiO2.If TVs are more or less than 300 to 800 mL range, the pressure will be adjusted by 1-2 cm H2O) accordingly
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Oxygen Desaturation Event ≤ 94%
Time Frame: Time in seconds beginning with the start of procedure (anesthesia induction) ending with procedure completion (eyes open to verbal stimuli).
|
Percentage of participants who develop a peripheral oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ≤ 94%
|
Time in seconds beginning with the start of procedure (anesthesia induction) ending with procedure completion (eyes open to verbal stimuli).
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Oxygen Desaturation Event < 90%
Time Frame: Time in seconds beginning with the start of procedure (anesthesia induction) ending with procedure completion (eyes open to verbal stimuli).
|
Percentage of participants who develop a peripheral oxygen saturation event < 90%.
|
Time in seconds beginning with the start of procedure (anesthesia induction) ending with procedure completion (eyes open to verbal stimuli).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in the Control Group With an Oxygen Saturation Less Than 90 % Who Responded to Rescue NIPPV
Time Frame: 3 minutes following a desaturation event < 90 %
|
We used non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as a first rescue maneuver in control patients who developed an oxygen desaturation less than 90 % and reported on the percentage of participants who responded.
The rescue was considered successful with recovery of oxygen saturation more than 90 % within 3 minutes.
|
3 minutes following a desaturation event < 90 %
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Makram M Gedeon, MD, Bristol Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2284-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458.
- Gay PC. Complications of noninvasive ventilation in acute care. Respir Care. 2009 Feb;54(2):246-57; discussion 257-8.
- Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Cote CJ, Nickinovich DG, Prachand V, Ward DS, Weaver EM, Ydens L, Yu S; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management. Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2006 May;104(5):1081-93; quiz 1117-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200605000-00026. No abstract available.
- Arakawa H, Kaise M, Sumiyama K, Saito S, Suzuki T, Tajiri H. Does pulse oximetry accurately monitor a patient's ventilation during sedated endoscopy under oxygen supplementation? Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):212-5. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013075.
- De Palma GD, Forestieri P. Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery of patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7777-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7777.
- Fouladpour N, Jesudoss R, Bolden N, Shaman Z, Auckley D. Perioperative Complications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Review of the Legal Literature. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):145-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000841. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):1228-9.
- Gomez V, Bhalla R, Heckman MG, Florit PT, Diehl NN, Rawal B, Lynch SA, Loeb DS. Routine Screening Endoscopy before Bariatric Surgery: Is It Necessary? Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2014 Dec 1;9(4):143-149. doi: 10.1089/bari.2014.0024.
- Goudra BG, Singh PM, Penugonda LC, Speck RM, Sinha AC. Significantly reduced hypoxemic events in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: Predictors and practice effect. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;30(1):71-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.125707.
- McVay T, Fang JC, Taylor L, Au A, Williams W, Presson AP, Al-Dulaimi R, Volckmann E, Ibele A. Safety Analysis of Bariatric Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy with Non-Anesthesia Administered Propofol Sedation. Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1501-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2478-4.
- Opperer M, Cozowicz C, Bugada D, Mokhlesi B, Kaw R, Auckley D, Chung F, Memtsoudis SG. Does Obstructive Sleep Apnea Influence Perioperative Outcome? A Qualitative Systematic Review for the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Task Force on Preoperative Preparation of Patients with Sleep-Disordered Breathing. Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1321-34. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001178.
- Saunders R, Erslon M, Vargo J. Modeling the costs and benefits of capnography monitoring during procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E340-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100719.
- Slagelse C, Vilmann P, Hornslet P, Jorgensen HL, Horsted TI. The role of capnography in endoscopy patients undergoing nurse-administered propofol sedation: a randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;48(10):1222-30. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.830327. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
- Soto RG, Davis M, Faulkner MJ. A comparison of the incidence of hypercapnea in non-obese and morbidly obese peri-operative patients using the SenTec transcutaneous pCO(2) monitor. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Jun;28(3):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9534-6. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
- Wani S, Azar R, Hovis CE, Hovis RM, Cote GA, Hall M, Waldbaum L, Kushnir V, Early D, Mullady DK, Murad F, Edmundowicz SA, Jonnalagadda SS. Obesity as a risk factor for sedation-related complications during propofol-mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1238-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.006.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20170730
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.