3D-CT-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Tumor-related Trigeminal Neuralgia

June 6, 2018 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

The Long-Term Outcome of 3D-CT-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Tumor-related Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study.

This study is designed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 3D-CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Approximately 1-13% of trigeminal neuralgia cases are secondary to intracranial tumors, and this condition is referred to as tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia (TRTN). TRTN can result from a lesion affecting any location along the pathway of the trigeminal nerve, such as Meckel's Cave, the posterior fossa, and the cerebellopontine angle. The posterior fossa is the most common location of TRTN, whereas meningioma and epidermoid cysts are the most common pathologies. The goals of TRTN treatment include controlling tumors and relieving pain. Tumor resection is regarded as the most effective treatment, and complete tumor removal is often followed by complete pain remission. However, for patients who cannot undergo the risk of a craniotomy and those with end-stage of malignant tumors or slow-growing benign tumors, surgery may not be the best choice. Conservatively, medication is considered the first-line therapy for relieving pain. However, pharmacology cannot provide satisfactory relief for all patients, and some patients may experience intolerable side effects. For these patients, minimally invasive interventional techniques are preferred. Radiosurgery has been commonly performed for the treatment of TRTN with promising efficacy. However, this intervention is associated with delayed latency of response. Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PRFT) is a low-risk, minimally invasive technique with an acute success rate of 97.6-99%. PRFT remains the most common percutaneous treatment for TN. In addition, this popular procedure may also safely and effectively be repeated if pain recurs. The PRFT procedure involves positioning the radiofrequency (RF) needle at the Gasserian ganglion via the foremen ovale. Suboptimal piercing may lead to unpleasant complications, including cerebrospinal fluid leakage, cranial nerve (VI) palsy and intracranial hemorrhage. Recently, computed tomography (CT) has been demonstrated to be a useful method to identify the optimal position and predict the intraoperative difficulties of the intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective study was conducted in Beijing Tiantan Hospital between March 2007 and February 2018. The local ethics committee approved this study and exempted the informed consent before the collection of patient data. We enrolled a total of 38 patients who fulfilled all following criteria: age>18 years; typical TN symptoms in the same lateral as intracranial tumors; uncontrolled symptoms or intolerable side effects of medication; and pain duration longer than 90 days. To confirm that the trigeminal pain was secondary to tumors, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in advance. Patients with infection at the puncture site, coagulopathy, epilepsy, other causes of TN, a history of mental disorders or anesthetic drug abuse were excluded from this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age>18 years,
  • typical TN symptoms in the same lateral as intracranial tumors,
  • uncontrolled symptoms or intolerable side effects of medication,
  • pain duration longer than 90 days
  • brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)confirmed that the trigeminal pain was secondary to intracranial tumors.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with infection at the puncture site,
  • coagulopathy,
  • epilepsy,
  • other causes of TN,
  • a history of mental disorders or anesthetic drug abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative recurrence-free rate
Time Frame: The enrollment of our study began on March 1st 2007 and ended on 31st October 2017. All following-up has been finished before February 28th 2018.
The modified Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score will be used to assess pain degree. Pain relief degree will be evaluated as BNI I= no pain without medication, BNI II= occasional pain, not require medication, BNI IIIa= no pain with medication, BNI IIIb= Controlled pain with medication, BNI IV= improved pain that inadequately controlled by medication, BNI IV= persistent pain that inadequately controlled by medication. A BNI grade that increased to IV-V from I-IIIb after operation was defined as recurrence.
The enrollment of our study began on March 1st 2007 and ended on 31st October 2017. All following-up has been finished before February 28th 2018.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: From pre-operation to 1 week after operation
Patient satisfaction is evaluated by a 5-point Likert scale, while 1 point represents very unsatisfactory and 5 points indicates very satisfactory
From pre-operation to 1 week after operation
Adverse events
Time Frame: The enrollment of our study began on March 1st 2007 and ended on 31st October 2017. All following-up has been finished before February 28th 2018.
Data regarding intra-and post=operative adverse events.
The enrollment of our study began on March 1st 2007 and ended on 31st October 2017. All following-up has been finished before February 28th 2018.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 29, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY 2018-024-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings