Clinical Study of Apatinib in the Treatment of Platinum Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

August 3, 2020 updated by: First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
For patients with "Platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer" after second-line chemotherapy failure Using apatinib as a single drug Clinical efficacy observation Single study no control

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The overall 5-year survival rate of ovarian cancer is 45%. The mortality rate of ovarian cancer accounts for the first in gynecologic cancer deaths. Ovarian cytoreductive surgery and postoperative platinum based chemotherapy are the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. About 80% of ovarian cancer will eventually show relapse and metastasis. All patients with recurrent ovarian cancer will eventually develop into "platinum resistance". Platinum resistance was found in 1-6 months with platinum-free interval. There is no standard treatment protocol for recurrent ovarian cancer of "platinum resistant," usually with platinum-free single chemotherapy, such as: paclitaxel, docetaxel, liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, topotecan and other. The response rate was 10%-30%, the median progression free survival was <4 months, and the median overall survival time was 12 months with platinum-free single-agent chemotherapy. The incidence of grade 3-4 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity is about 40%. And chemotherapy has 14% mortality rate within 30 days of the start of single-agent chemotherapy in the literature reported. VEGF plays an important role in invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer. VEGF directly stimulates tumor cell proliferation, growth and migration, and promotes ovarian cancer metastasis. The growth and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells are related to the quantity of VEGF. It has confirmed that inhibition of VEGF function can inhibit angiogenesis and inhibit the growth and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells in vivo experiments. The Chinese State Food and Drug Administration approved small molecular targeting drug, apatinib, for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, for approval in December 13, 2014. The role of apatinib is the intracellular ATP binding site of VEGFR2 tyrosine receptor, which blocks the signal transduction of VEGF binding and leads to tumor angiogenesis inhibition. Apatinib can inhibit VEGFR2 effectively at a very low concentration, and a higher concentration can inhibit the platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), c-Kit and c-Src. Apatinib has only 20% grade 3-4 hematological and non hematological toxicity in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Deng et al reported one cases of progressive ovarian cancer. After 4-line chemotherapy resistance, a daily oral apatinib 500 mg was taken and a longer progression free survival (11.3 months) was obtained. Xie Congying et al of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University had a report in the 2017 ESMO conference. The report reviewed 15 cases of recurrent and metastatic ovarian cancer with a single drug atapatinib in the treatment of more than 2 lines of chemotherapeutic drug resistance. The median progression free survival was 5 months, the objective remission rate was 53.3% and the disease control rate was 73.3%. It is known from the above reports that apatinib has good efficacy and low toxicity in the treatment of "platinum resistant" recurrent ovarian cancer, but there is lack of prospective study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150001
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female, age ≥18 years, signed informed consent.
  2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  3. Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  4. Histologically or pathologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. Failure of at least two-line chemotherapy OR platinum resistant ovarian cancer (defined as relapsing within 6 months after a platinum based chemotherapy) OR platinum refractory ovarian cancer (defined as progressing during a platinum based chemotherapy).
  5. Criteria for recurrence or metastasis: blood CA125 is more than 2 times the upper limit of normal value, or imaging findings (CT/MRI/PET-CT) show recurrence or metastasis, or ascites cancer cells are positive.
  6. Platinum refractory or resistant criteria: relapse or metastasis within 6 months end of platinum based chemotherapy.
  7. The interval time to last chemotherapy was more than 4 weeks.
  8. The patient received radiotherapy or surgery for more than 4 weeks, and the wound healed completely.
  9. Patients must have adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria: White blood cell count ≥ 3 x 10^9/L, Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (≥ 1.0 x 10^9/L), Hemoglobin of ≥ 80 g/L, Platelets ≥ 70 x 10^9/L. Total bilirubin ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal (ULN), AST and ALT ≤ 2 x ULN. Serum creatinine ≤ 1 x ULN
  10. The main organs (liver, kidney and heart) function are basically normal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had prior exposure to apatinib or has known allegies to apatinib.
  2. History of other malignant tumors (except those with cured basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ).
  3. History of myocardial infarction, or unstable angina, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Grade III-IV within 6 months prior to Day 1.
  4. Patients with QT interval prolongation.
  5. Inadequately controlled hypertension.
  6. Serious, non-healing wound, active ulcer, bowel obstruction.
  7. History of abdominal fistula or gastrointestinal perforation within 28 days prior to Day 1.
  8. Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  9. Patients with positive urine protein.
  10. Major surgical procedure within 28 days prior to Day 1.
  11. Symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastasis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: apatinib
1 times a day, atapinib, 500 mg, is taken orally
Drug: Apatinib
An anti-tumor Targeted drug
Other Names:
  • Apatinib mesylate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective remission rate, ORR
Time Frame: 3 years
Complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
progression- free survival, PFS
Time Frame: 3 years
from entry time to disease progression or any cause of death
3 years
grade 3-4 hematologic or non hematologic toxicity
Time Frame: 3 years
defined by CTCAE version 4.0
3 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: 3 years
from entry time to death of any cause
3 years
disease control rate, DCR
Time Frame: 3 years
Complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) + disease stability (SD)
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: ZhiPing Liu, MD, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201801

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The investigators have no other clinical trial about ovarian cancer

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings