Use of RespinPAD in Elderly Patients (RESPINPAD)

November 15, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Use of the RespIn PAD in the Bronchial De-enclosure of Elderly Patients Who Cannot Benefit From Respiratory Physiotherapy

Secretive (or obstructive), acute or chronic pathologies are common in an increasing number of elderly patients. The medical teams are confronted with difficulties in the management of these patients: they do not benefit from optimal respiratory physiotherapy, whether manual or mechanical, due to functional deficiencies, cognitive functions that are sometimes limited or poorly adapted equipment.

The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new RespinPAD device in the bronchial de-encapsulation of elderly patients who cannot benefit from optimal physiotherapy compared to conventional treatment (nasal or bucco-tracheal aspiration and aerosols).

The study will include 20 non-dementia patients and 20 dementia patients who will benefit from the use of RespinPAD and 20 patients who will benefit from conventional therapy. All the patients included will be over 70 years old and will be recruited when they are admitted to hospital in the geriatric hospital of the CHU de Nice. They will be included if they present a bronchial obstruction secondary to a respiratory pathology secreting whatever the etiology and for which optimal respiratory physiotherapy is not possible after evaluation by a physiotherapist.

Patients using the RespinPAD device will benefit from a 20-minute session twice daily for 5 days.

The primary endpoint (quantitative criterion) will be the measurement of oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) volumes for each patient included before and after each session of RespinPAD use or conventional treatment for the control group.

Secondary judging criteria will be a heteroassessment of the SEVA (Airway Overcrowding Score), the Borg Scale and the Algoplus or Digital Comfort Scale. For the effectiveness assessment, the SEVA score will allow for a qualitative assessment to complement the primary endpoint. The collection of volumes of secretions, pulse oximeter, mean length of stay, O2 withdrawal time and drug aerosols will also be used to compare results with previous studies. With regard to secondary safety and feasibility criteria, hemodynamic constants, electrocardiogram and the actual duration of the sessions will be recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Nice Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over 70 years of age
  • member of the social security system
  • hospitalized at the gerontology centre of the CHU de Nice (Cimiez): short geriatric stay, follow-up care and rehabilitation, long-term care unit or EHPAD.
  • presenting a clinical bronchial obstruction (auscultatory signs with ronchi type) secondary to a secreting pathology (exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive bronchitis, acute bronchitis or acute infectious pneumonitis, repeated swallowing disorders, pulmonary disease of inhalation...) with or without radiological bronchial syndrome.
  • for which a respiratory physiotherapy is not effective after expertise of the physiotherapist

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a patient who is not hemodynamically stable or who has impaired alertness (glasgow<15) or shows signs of respiratory control (choracic-abdominal sway, costal or superclavicular draft, bronchospasm),
  • Patient or trustworthy person who did not complete and sign the consent to participate in the study,
  • a patient with chest pain, clinical intracranial hypertension (HIC) greater than 20 mmHg, uncontrolled high blood pressure, dyspnea of a different etiology than bronchial obstruction (a rapid and/or poorly tolerated ACFA, clinical or radiological pleural effusion, empyema, pneumothorax, decompensated heart failure, pericarditis, pericarditis
  • The patient cannot benefit from naso-tracheal aspiration,
  • End-stage palliative care patient
  • patient already participating in another study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RespinPad and usual treatment
RespinPad slid into the back of the patient sitting at 45° in the armchair or bed.
medical aerosol session followed by aspiration or not, as required
Active Comparator: only usual treatment
medical aerosol session followed by aspiration or not, as required

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VO2
Time Frame: 17 months
Measurements of oxygen consumption (VO2) (quantitative) volumes on each patient included before and after each RespinPad session, and before and after each conventional treatment for the control group.
17 months
VCO2
Time Frame: 17 months
Measurements of carbon dioxide production (VCO2) (quantitative) volumes on each patient included before and after each RespinPad session, and before and after each conventional treatment for the control group.
17 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-PP-17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute or Chronic Respiratory Pathologies

Clinical Trials on Respin Pad

Search Similar Trials