Heating Pad for in Office Cystoscopy and Urodynamic Testing

The Effects of a Heating Pad on Anxiety, Pain, and Distress During In-office Cystoscopy and Urodynamics: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient frequently report experiencing discomfort associated with cystoscopy or urodynamic studies (UDS), and a small percentage of patients refuse these important procedures due to discomfort or fear of discomfort. Heating pads are an inexpensive and low-risk way to reduce patient discomfort during these procedures, which to our knowledge has not been investigated in the United States.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Invasive office procedures such as cystoscopy and urodynamic studies (UDS) are commonly performed for many urologic and Urogynecologic conditions including, but not limited to, incontinence, voiding dysfunction, urinary retention, hematuria, and other lower urinary tract symptoms. Cystoscopy involves the insertion of a rigid or flexible cystoscope through the urethra and into the bladder. Urodynamic studies involve the placement of urethral and rectal catheters. Both cystoscopy and UDS involve filling the bladder with fluid, and these procedures are essential to the diagnosis and management of many of the conditions listed above.

While both procedures are office procedures that are generally well tolerated, some patients can experience significant discomfort, pain, or anxiety. Some nonpharmacologic therapies have been investigated to relieve anxiety, pain, and distress, such as music and aromatherapy. Heating treatments are also known to reduce muscle pain by increasing local blood flow and decreasing distress. The use of a heating pad has become an established complementary modality in some invasive procedures. A previous study from South Korea has shown benefit of heating pad use for anxiety, pain, and distress during cystoscopy and UDS; however to our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating the effect of heating pad use on patients in the United States, who may have inherent demographical differences compared to patients from South Korea.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

192

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Able to read and write English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Contraindications to cystoscopy or urodynamic testing
  • Patients who receive other procedures or treatment at the time of cystoscopy, such as bladder biopsy or Botox injection
  • Patients with spinal cord injury or lack of sensation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Heating Pad heated
An electrical heating pad will be applied prior to the cystoscopy or urodynamic procedure
A powered heating pad
Other Names:
  • Heating pad
Placebo Comparator: Placebo heating pad
An electrical heating pad that is not heated will be applied prior to the cystoscopy or urodynamic procedure
A heating pad that is not powered on
Other Names:
  • Non-heated heating pad

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in score on a 10-point visual analog scale where where 0 indicates the least amount of anxiety and 10 the greatest
Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Survey (HADS)
Time Frame: Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in score on the anxiety subscale score, a total score of 0-21 is possible, with a score between 0-7= Normal, 8-10= Borderline abnormal and 11-21= abnormal
Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in Pain (VAS)
Time Frame: Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in score on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10, where 0 indicates the least amount of pain and 10 the greatest
Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in Distress (VAS)
Time Frame: Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in score on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-10, where 0 indicates the least amount of distress and 10 the greatest
Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Blood pressure measure
Time Frame: Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in blood pressure
Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Heart rate
Time Frame: Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Change in heart rate
Pre- and Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wait time
Time Frame: Pre-procedure to beginning of procedure (about 30 minutes)
Amount of time spent waiting prior to procedure
Pre-procedure to beginning of procedure (about 30 minutes)
Time spent on procedure
Time Frame: Pre- to Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)
Amount of time taken to complete procedure
Pre- to Post-procedure (about 30 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jun Song, MD, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC20230455H

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All de-identified IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

When summary data are published or otherwise made available at study completion

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Electrical heating pad

3
Subscribe