Comparing Use of a Digital Health System of Pelvic Floor Exercise Program to Kegel Exercises in Stress Urinary Incontinence

October 6, 2020 updated by: Renovia, Inc.

A Prospective Randomized Efficacy Study Comparing a Pelvic Digital Health System Home Program of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise to Kegel Exercises in the Treatment of Stress-Predominant Urinary Incontinence

A randomized controlled trial for patients with stress urinary incontinence or stress-dominant mixed incontinence. Subjects will be randomized to 8-weeks of home kegel exercises or 8 weeks of pelvic floor muscle exercises using the leva digital pelvic health system that includes visual biofeedback via smartphone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A randomized controlled trial for patients with stress urinary incontinence or stress-dominant mixed incontinence.Subjects will be randomized to 8-weeks of home kegel exercises or 8 weeks of pelvic floor muscle exercises using the leva digital pelvic health system that includes visual biofeedback via smartphone. Leva subjects will perform guided pelvic floor muscle exercises for 2 1/2 minutes twice daily. Home kegel subjects will perform kegel exercises three times daily. Following 8-weeks of training, subjects will be permitted to continue the exercises or pursue additional therapies as indicated. Subjects randomized to the leva digital health system will be further randomized to receive automated reminders for the remainder of one year, or no additional reminders.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
77

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Group
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Univeristy of Oklahoma
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Urology San Antonio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Capable of giving informed consent.
  • Self-reported stress-type UI symptoms of >= three months duration
  • Diagnosis of stress predominant urinary incontinence based on MESA stress symptom score greater than MESA urge symptom score (percent of total possible urge score).
  • UDI-6 score >/= 25
  • Willing to participate in the 8-week study with follow up at 6-and 12-months, refraining from the pursuit of treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence using other modalities (i.e. will not wear a pessary, participate in pelvic floor PT or surgery) during the first 8- weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of a vagina.
  • Age <18 years.
  • Stage 3-4 pelvic organ prolapse (as determined by POP-Q).
  • Diagnosis of any neuromuscular disease.
  • Non-ambulatory.
  • Currently pregnant or <12 months post-partum.
  • </= 3 months after failed surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
  • Previous pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) within the last 12 months under a supervised therapeutic plan of care.
  • Currently taking, or has taken within the last 2 months, medication to treat urinary incontinence.
  • Prior augmentation cystoplasty or artificial sphincter.
  • Implanted nerve stimulator for urinary symptoms.
  • Participation in another clinical study within 30 days of screening.
  • Impaired cognitive function.
  • Contraindication to the use of a vaginal probe.
  • Unable to understand instructions on the use of the leva® Plus Pelvic Digital Health System.
  • Unable to actively recruit the pelvic floor muscles to any degree for attempted volitional contraction.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Leva Arm
Subjects will undergo pelvic floor muscle training using the leva device (a vaginal probe) which provides immediate visual feedback via smartphone regarding the motion of pelvic floor muscles. Subjects will perform exercises 2 1/2 minutes twice daily for 8 weeks. At the beginning of the study, four weeks later, and eight weeks later subjects will undergo pelvic floor muscle testing using the PFDx device and surveys to document response to training. After eight weeks, subjects may pursue any additional treatments they wish, but may continue to use the device. They will be further randomized to receive reminder text messages or no messages over 10 months. Subjects will be asked to complete follow up surveys at 6- and 12-months.
Device: Leva
Subjects randomized to Leva will use a vaginal probe containing motion-based sensors to direct the performance of pelvic muscle exercises.
Device: PFDx
All subjects (in both study arms) will be evaluated using a vaginally placed device that will evaluate pelvic floor motion to document change in pelvic floor muscle function resulting from pelvic floor muscle exercises.
Active Comparator: Kegel Arm
Subjects in this arm will perform pelvic floor muscle exercises (Kegels) for the treatment of stress or mixed urinary incontinence. Subjects will be asked to perform exercises three times daily for 8 weeks. At the beginning of the study, four weeks later, and eight weeks later, subjects will undergo pelvic floor muscle testing (using the PFDx device) and surveys to document response to training. After eight weeks, subjects may pursue any additional treatments they wish, but may continue to use the device.
Device: PFDx
All subjects (in both study arms) will be evaluated using a vaginally placed device that will evaluate pelvic floor motion to document change in pelvic floor muscle function resulting from pelvic floor muscle exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PGI-I
Time Frame: 8 weeks after randomization
PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, is a five-point scale that ranges from "not at all" to "very much better."
8 weeks after randomization
UDI-6
Time Frame: 8 weeks after randomization
Urogenital Distress Inventory is a six question validated questionnaire evaluating incontinence symptoms. It is scored from 0-100, with higher scores indicating more severely bothersome symptoms
8 weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-day voiding diary
Time Frame: 8 weeks after randomization
An objective evaluation of urinary incontinence
8 weeks after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Adherence to the exercise regimen will be evaluated
8 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Renovia, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 24, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REN-05

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings