The PRISM Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

October 23, 2024 updated by: Abby Rosenberg, Seattle Children's Hospital

The Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) Intervention: a Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial for Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention among Adolescents and Young Adults receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematology malignancy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The experience of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignancy or cancer predisposition among Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) is particularly difficult because age-related developmental challenges of identity, relationships, and vocation may add to the burden of cancer. Compared to other age-groups, AYAs have poorer psychosocial outcomes including increased anxiety and depression and poorer adherence to oral immunosuppressive medications. These outcomes may, in turn, predispose AYAs to disease-related morbidity and mortality such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and/or cancer-relapse. A potential barrier to improving these experiences may be that AYAs have few opportunities to develop the personal resources needed to handle adversity. We have previously developed the "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management" (PRISM) intervention for AYAs with serious illness. This manualized, brief intervention is delivered in 4, 30-60 minute, one-on-one sessions, followed by a Parent/ Caregiver/ Spouse/ significant other inclusive meeting. It targets skills in stress-management and mindfulness, goal-setting, positive reframing, and meaning-making. All of these skills are associated with improved patient well-being in other populations, and preliminary findings from a recently closed phase II randomized controlled trial among AYAs with newly diagnosed cancer suggest PRISM is associated with improved health-related quality of life. This study will build on our prior experience and fill a critical knowledge gap regarding PRISM's impact among AYAs receiving HCT. Thus, we will conduct a multi-site randomized controlled trial with the primary trial outcome of patient-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will include the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in this population, the impact of the intervention on parent well-being, and patient adherence to oral graft-versus-host-disease medications. We hypothesize that AYAs who receive PRISM will report fewer mixed affective symptoms, while their parents report improved quality of life and psychological distress. We also anticipate the intervention will positively impact adherence and be cost-effective. In sum, this study offers an opportunity to expand the body of knowledge regarding methodologically rigorous and evidence-based psychosocial interventions and standards of care for AYAs with hematologic malignancies. Ultimately, this research has the potential to reduce the burden of cancer in these vulnerable populations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
143

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama, Birmingham
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98145
        • Seattle Children's Hospital Cancer and Blood Disorders Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for adolescent/young adult (AYA) patient:

  • Patient aged 12-24 years
  • Receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignancy or cancer predisposition syndrome
  • Within 4 weeks of HCT "day zero"
  • Able to speak English
  • Able to read English or Spanish
  • Cognitively able to participate in interviews

Exclusion Criteria for AYA patient:

  • Patient refusal
  • Cognitively or physically unable to participate in interviews
  • Unable to speak English
  • Unable to read English or Spanish

For enrolled caregivers of AYA patient (no age limit):

Inclusion criteria:

  • AYA Child of caregiver agreed to participate
  • One caregiver per patient-caregiver dyad
  • Parent/guardian cognitively and physically able to participate
  • Parent/guardian is able to speak/read English or Spanish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PRISM (Promoting Resilience in Stress Management)
Resilience Skills Training
Behavioral: PRISM (Promoting Resilience in Stress Management)
Manualized Skills-Training Program targeting resilience resources: stress-management, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual psychosocial care (control arm, no intervention)
No Intervention: Caregivers
Caregivers of participants, no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) Score - Depression Sub-score
Time Frame: 6-months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale -Depression sub scale assesses mixed affective symptoms in patients with serious illness. The scale consists of 7 questions for depression. Each is scored from 0-3, for a total range of 0-21 points. "Caseness" of depression is defined as ≥8 points, with sensitivity/specificity of 0.8/0.8 for depression. The depression sub-scale will be measured as a continuous variable. Higher scores indicate more symptoms.
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hope Scale Scores
Time Frame: 6-months
The Snyder "Hope" Scale measures "the overall perception that one's goals can be met." The instrument scored on an 8-point Likert scale (score range 0-64). Higher scores imply greater levels of hopeful thought patterns.
6-months
PedsQL Generic Core and Cancer-Related Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: 6-months
The PedsQL 4.0 Generic and 3.0 Cancer Module include 50 items evaluating health-related quality of life of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and total scores transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better HRQOL. Internal consistency ranges from 0.75 to 0.92.
6-months
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: 6-months
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) measures inherent resiliency. The 10-item instrument has high internal consistency. Each item consists of a 5-point Likert scale (scored from zero to four). ranging from 0-40 with higher scores reflecting greater perceived resilience.
6-months
Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale Score - Anxiety Sub-score
Time Frame: 6-months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety sub scale assesses mixed affective symptoms in patients with serious illness. It consists of 7 questions on a 3 point Likert scale for a total range of 0-21. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.
6-months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD7)
Time Frame: 6-months
7-item survey used to assess anxiety symptoms. Scored from 0-21 with higher scores indicated higher anxiety.
6-months
Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Time Frame: 6-months
8-item survey assessing depression severity. Each item scored on a 4-point Likert scale with a range of 0-27. Higher scores indicate higher depression.
6-months
Medical Outcomes Study Rand 36-item Health Survey
Time Frame: 6-months
This is a measure of health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better health status
6-months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of PRISM on heart-rate variability
Time Frame: 6-months
Exploratory aim: A subset of patients will participate in an optional companion study to evaluate the impact of PRISM on Heart Rate Variability as a biomarker of stress
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seattle Children's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Abby R Rosenberg, MD, MS, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 23, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00001077 (SC-N126)
  • R01CA225629 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All IPD will be protected and maintained by the study team

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings