The Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) Intervention: a Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial for Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

January 8, 2024 updated by: Abby Rosenberg, Seattle Children's Hospital
Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention among Adolescents and Young Adults receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematology malignancy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The experience of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignancy or cancer predisposition among Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) is particularly difficult because age-related developmental challenges of identity, relationships, and vocation may add to the burden of cancer. Compared to other age-groups, AYAs have poorer psychosocial outcomes including increased anxiety and depression and poorer adherence to oral immunosuppressive medications. These outcomes may, in turn, predispose AYAs to disease-related morbidity and mortality such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and/or cancer-relapse. A potential barrier to improving these experiences may be that AYAs have few opportunities to develop the personal resources needed to handle adversity. We have previously developed the "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management" (PRISM) intervention for AYAs with serious illness. This manualized, brief intervention is delivered in 4, 30-60 minute, one-on-one sessions, followed by a Parent/ Caregiver/ Spouse/ significant other inclusive meeting. It targets skills in stress-management and mindfulness, goal-setting, positive reframing, and meaning-making. All of these skills are associated with improved patient well-being in other populations, and preliminary findings from a recently closed phase II randomized controlled trial among AYAs with newly diagnosed cancer suggest PRISM is associated with improved health-related quality of life. This study will build on our prior experience and fill a critical knowledge gap regarding PRISM's impact among AYAs receiving HCT. Thus, we will conduct a multi-site randomized controlled trial with the primary trial outcome of patient-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will include the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in this population, the impact of the intervention on parent well-being, and patient adherence to oral graft-versus-host-disease medications. We hypothesize that AYAs who receive PRISM will report fewer mixed affective symptoms, while their parents report improved quality of life and psychological distress. We also anticipate the intervention will positively impact adherence and be cost-effective. In sum, this study offers an opportunity to expand the body of knowledge regarding methodologically rigorous and evidence-based psychosocial interventions and standards of care for AYAs with hematologic malignancies. Ultimately, this research has the potential to reduce the burden of cancer in these vulnerable populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama, Birmingham
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98145
        • Seattle Children's Hospital Cancer and Blood Disorders Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 12-24 years
  • Receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignancy or cancer predisposition syndrome
  • Within 4 weeks of HCT "day zero"
  • Able to speak English
  • Able to read English or Spanish
  • Cognitively able to participate in interviews

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Cognitively or physically unable to participate in interviews
  • Unable to speak English
  • Unable to read English or Spanish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRISM (Promoting Resilience in Stress Management)
Resilience Skills Training
Manualized Skills-Training Program targeting resilience resources: stress-management, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual psychosocial care (control arm, no intervention)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale Score - Depression sub-score
Time Frame: 6-months
The HADS assesses mixed affective symptoms in patients with serious illness. The scale consists of 7 questions for anxiety and 7 for depression. Each is scored from 0-3, for a total range of 0-21 points per subscale. "Caseness" of anxiety and depression is defined as ≥8 points, with sensitivity/specificity of 0.8/0.9 for anxiety and 0.8/0.8 for depression. The depression sub-scale will be measured as a continuous variable.
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Score
Time Frame: 6-months
The MSAS measures the presence, severity, frequency, and extent of bother from 32 symptoms Likert scales assess physical and psychological symptoms. Total- and sub-scores are calculated as an average and normalized to a scale of 0-100, with higher scores representing higher symptom burden.
6-months
PedsQL Generic Core and Cancer-Related Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: 6-months
The PedsQL 4.0 Generic and 3.0 Cancer Module include 50 items evaluating health-related quality of life of AYAs with cancer. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and total scores transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better HRQOL. Internal consistency ranges from 0.75 to 0.92.
6-months
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: 6-months
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) measures inherent resiliency. Two items from the original 25-item CD-RISC were used to create a brief, 2-item scale (the CD-RISC2), namely items 1 ("Able to adapt to change") and 8 ("Tend to bounce back after illness or hardship"). Each item consists of a 5-point Likert scale (scored from zero to four). The 2-item scale has a total of 10 points, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived resilience.
6-months
Hope Scale Scores
Time Frame: 6-months
The Snyder "Hope" Scale measures "the overall perception that one's goals can be met." The instrument scored on an 8-point Likert scale (score range 0-64). Higher scores imply greater levels of hopeful thought patterns.
6-months
Parent Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7 scores)
Time Frame: 6-months
Parent Anxiety: This 7-item survey is commonly used to identify cases of generalized anxiety disorder and to assess symptom severity. GAD-7 score range from 0 to 21, with scores of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 representing mild, moderate, and severe anxiety symptoms levels, respectively.
6-months
Parent Depression (PHQ-8 scores)
Time Frame: 6-months
Parent Depression: This 8-item survey is scored on a 4-point Likert scale and the sum (0- 27) indicates the degree of depression, with scores of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 representing mild, moderate, and severe depression.
6-months
Parent quality of life (SF-36 scores)
Time Frame: 6-months
The SF-36 incorporates 8 concepts: physical functioning, body pain, limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems as well as emotional well-being and social functioning, energy, fatigue and general health perceptions. Scores will be summed and normalized to a 100 point (0-100) scale, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
6-months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety sub-score
Time Frame: 6-months
The HADS assesses mixed affective symptoms in patients with serious illness. The scale consists of 7 questions for anxiety and 7 for depression. Each is scored from 0-3, for a total range of 0-21 points per subscale. "Caseness" of anxiety and depression is defined as ≥8 points, with sensitivity/specificity of 0.8/0.9 for anxiety and 0.8/0.8 for depression. The anxiety sub-scale will be measured as a continuous variable.
6-months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of PRISM on heart-rate variability
Time Frame: 6-months
Exploratory aim: A subset of patients will participate in an optional companion study to evaluate the impact of PRISM on Heart Rate Variability as a biomarker of stress
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abby R Rosenberg, MD, MS, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00001077 (SC-N126)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All IPD will be protected and maintained by the study team

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on PRISM (Promoting Resilience in Stress Management)

3
Subscribe