The Safety and Efficacy of Deferoxamine for Treating Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

February 20, 2019 updated by: Li Min, Jinan Military General Hospital

The Safety and Efficacy of Deferoxamine Combined With Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To investigate the safety and efficacy of deferoxamine (DFO) combined with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

DFO, an iron chelator, is considered as a potential drug to the treatment of HCC. Ferrum is an important transition metal for organisms and the liver plays a major role in its storage. However, in pathologic conditions, it will lead to hepatocyte injury through the free radicals generated by excess iron. In addition, excess iron accumulation in the liver increases toxic free iron, which is closely associated with hepatic inflammation, as well as the development and progression of HCC. Reduction of iron is likely an important therapeutic targets for treating HCC. Iron reduction therapy has been efficacious in both in animal HCC models and results of clinical studies also suggest potential efficacy for HCC. DFO chelates iron by forming a stable complex that prevents the iron from entering into further chemical reactions. The investigators assume that DFO, combined with TACE, may provide additional efficacy in patients with unresectable HCC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250031
        • Recruiting
        • 960th hospital of PLA
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age.
  • The participant must have histologically-confirmed, unresectable HCC
  • At least 1 measurable lesion, and overall tumor lesions occupying < 50% of liver volume
  • The participant has provided signed informed consent
  • No known allergy to contrast media
  • Not pregnant
  • No vascular anatomy or bleeding that would preclude catheter placement or emboli injection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving concurrent radiotherapy or immunotherapy.
  • Patients who have received previous chemotherapy, biological agents, or radiotherapy.
  • Prior transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) or transarterial embolisation (TAE).
  • Prior liver transplantation or liver resection.
  • Current or recent (within 10 days of study start) use of full-dose anticoagulants for therapeutic purposes.
  • Patients with high risk esophageal/gastric varices.
  • The participant has central nervous system (CNS) metastases or carcinomatous meningitis
  • The participant has poorly-controlled hypertension [in other words (ie), blood pressure in abnormal range despite medical management]

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Deferoxamine
Patients are treated with deferoxamine and conventional TACE.
Drug: Deferoxamine and conventional TACE
Deferoxamine is injected before conventional transarterial chemoembolization.
Other Names:
  • Deferoxamine & TACE
Active Comparator: Conventional TACE
Patients are treated with conventional TACE.
Drug: Conventional TACE
Conventional chemoembolization drugs are injected through hepatic artery.
Other Names:
  • TACE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Unresectable Hepatocellular Cancer
Time Frame: First dose to date of progressive disease or death due to any cause [every 3 cycles up to 36 months (1 cycle=2 weeks)]
PFS is defined as the time from the first day of therapy to the first evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. As classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, disease progression is having at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and/or unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion and/or detection of a new lesion. Participants who are alive and without disease progression and participants who did not progress and are subsequently lost to follow-up are censored at the last objective tumor assessment.
First dose to date of progressive disease or death due to any cause [every 3 cycles up to 36 months (1 cycle=2 weeks)]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Progression
Time Frame: First dose to date of PD [every 3 cycles up to 36 months (1 cycle=2 weeks)]
The time from first day of therapy to the first date of objective evidence of progressive disease (PD) by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. PD is defined as having at least a 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions and/or unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion and/or detection of new lesion. Time to PD is censored at the date of death or study discontinuation.
First dose to date of PD [every 3 cycles up to 36 months (1 cycle=2 weeks)]
Overall Survival
Time Frame: First dose to date of death up to 36 months
Overall survival (OS) is the duration from first dose to death due to any cause. OS is censored at last contact date for participants who are alive at the end of follow-up period or lost to follow-up.
First dose to date of death up to 36 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response or Partial Response
Time Frame: First dose to date of objective progressive disease (PD) or death up to 36 months
Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). As classified according to Response using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, CR is the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimeters (mm) and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions. PR is having at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions.
First dose to date of objective progressive disease (PD) or death up to 36 months
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Time of first response (CR, PR or Stable disease) to disease progression, or death due to any cause [every 3 cycles up to 36 months (1 cycle=2 weeks)]
Duration of response is the interval from the date of initial documented response [complete response (CR) , partial response (PR) or Stable disease] to the first documented date of disease progression, initiation of other (or additional) antitumor therapy is first reported, or death due to any cause. As classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, CR is the disappearance of all target lesions, PR is having at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, and stable disease is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease. Disease progression is having at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and/or unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion and/or detection of a new lesion. Data are censored for participants who did not progress or die.
Time of first response (CR, PR or Stable disease) to disease progression, or death due to any cause [every 3 cycles up to 36 months (1 cycle=2 weeks)]
Tumor Necrosis
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 3 years, 36 months)
Tumor necrosis is quantified in liver lesions greater than 2 cm at Baseline. When MRI showed many cut surfaces for a single tumor, tumor size and the size of necrotic area is measured by accumulation of the serial sections containing the tumor. Lipiodol accumulation without contrast enhance in tumor after TACE is regarded as an indication of necrosis. Tumor necrosis is assessed at Baseline and 1-3 days prior to the next scheduled transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) till disease progression. The extent of tumor necrosis is presented as the percentage of the tumor volume at Baseline.
Baseline to the end of the study (up to 3 years, 36 months)
Number of Participants With Iron Reduction of Liver
Time Frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 3 years, 36 months)
The iron of liver will be measured by MRI, where R2* and QSM is applied to present the quantity of iron. Iron reduction is assessed at Baseline and 1-3 days prior to the next scheduled transarterial chemoembolisation. The test will be repeated 1 -3 days after the therapy. The reduction of liver iron will be calculated accordingly.
Baseline to the end of the study (up to 3 years, 36 months)
The Prognostic Value of Reduction of Liver Iron
Time Frame: Prior to TACE at baseline, 1 -3 days after the therapy
The iron of liver will be measured by MRI, where R2* and QSM is applied to present the quantity of iron. All patients will undergo MRI before TACE, and the test will be repeated 1 -3 days after the therapy till disease progression. The reduction of liver iron will be calculated accordingly. Based on the measurements mentioned above, the prognostic value of reduction of liver iron will be analyzed.
Prior to TACE at baseline, 1 -3 days after the therapy
Number of Participants With Drug-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: First dose to 36 months
Data presented are the number of participants who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), Grade 3 or higher TEAEs, or adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation of treatment that are considered by the investigator to be related to ramucirumab. A summary of SAEs and other nonserious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events section.
First dose to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jinan Military General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JNZY20181245

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable

Clinical Trials on Deferoxamine and conventional TACE

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings