Neurogenic Inflammation in Peri-implant and Periodontal Diseases
Neurogenic Inflammatory Response in Peri-implant and Periodontal Diseases Assessed by Biochemical Analysis of the Neuropeptides in Gingival Crevicular Fluid.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
The main inclusion criteria for patient selection were as follows:
- Compliance with systematic maintenance care;
- Adult, non-smoker, systemically healthy
- Not using any medicament for the last 6 months ;
- Partially dentated patient treated with implant-supported metal ceramic full crowns and/or fixed partial dentures
- As the study was split-mouth designed, in each individual at least one implant and one matching tooth in the same mouth symmetrically representing the same tooth group (premolars/molars);
- A single type of metal ceramic implant restoration that is functional for at least 1 year; and a matching tooth with no dental or endodontic restorations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical history of cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease and any other systemic disease affecting lipid metabolism (i.e. impaired glucose tolerance, metabolic syndrome);
- Compromised immune system;
- Pregnancy, menopause, or lactation;
- Ongoing drug therapy that might affect the clinical characteristics of periodontitis and lipid metabolism;
- Dental treatment during the 6 months prior to data collection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Group 1-Health periodontal
This group created by individuals with healthy periodontal tissues.
Periodontal status/peri-implant was assessed by clinical examination and classified according to criteria proposed by the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Disease and Conditions.
|
GCF/PISF samples were collected using periopaper strips.
Prior to sample collection, each site was gently air-dried, all supragingival plaque was removed, and the area was carefully isolated to prevent samples from being contaminated by saliva.
|
|
Group 2- Healthy peri-implant
This group created by individuals with healthy peri-implant tissues.
Periodontal status/peri-implant was assessed by clinical examination and classified according to criteria proposed by the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Disease and Conditions.
|
GCF/PISF samples were collected using periopaper strips.
Prior to sample collection, each site was gently air-dried, all supragingival plaque was removed, and the area was carefully isolated to prevent samples from being contaminated by saliva.
|
|
group 3- Gingivitis
This group created by individuals with gingivitis.
Periodontal/peri-implant status was assessed by clinical examination and classified according to criteria proposed by the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Disease and Conditions.
|
GCF/PISF samples were collected using periopaper strips.
Prior to sample collection, each site was gently air-dried, all supragingival plaque was removed, and the area was carefully isolated to prevent samples from being contaminated by saliva.
|
|
Group 4-Peri-implant Mucositis
This group created by individuals with peri-implant mucositis.
Periodontal/peri-implant status was assessed by clinical examination and classified according to criteria proposed by the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Disease and Conditions.
|
GCF/PISF samples were collected using periopaper strips.
Prior to sample collection, each site was gently air-dried, all supragingival plaque was removed, and the area was carefully isolated to prevent samples from being contaminated by saliva.
|
|
Group 5-Periodontitis
This group created by individuals with periodontitis.
Periodontal/peri-implant status was assessed by clinical examination and classified according to criteria proposed by the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Disease and Conditions.
|
GCF/PISF samples were collected using periopaper strips.
Prior to sample collection, each site was gently air-dried, all supragingival plaque was removed, and the area was carefully isolated to prevent samples from being contaminated by saliva.
|
|
Group 6-Periimplantitis
This group created by individuals with peri-implantitis.
Periodontal/peri-implant status was assessed by clinical examination and classified according to criteria proposed by the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Disease and Conditions.
|
GCF/PISF samples were collected using periopaper strips.
Prior to sample collection, each site was gently air-dried, all supragingival plaque was removed, and the area was carefully isolated to prevent samples from being contaminated by saliva.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gingival crevicular fluid/peri-implant sulcular fluid Level of Substance-P
Time Frame: 8-10 am on the day following periodontal status assessment.
|
Substance-P (SP) is a neuropeptide of the tachykinin family and marker of neurogenic inflammation.
|
8-10 am on the day following periodontal status assessment.
|
|
Gingival crevicular fluid/peri-implant sulcular fluid Level of neurokinin-A
Time Frame: 8-10 am on the day following periodontal status assessment.
|
Neurokinin-A is a neuropeptide of the tachykinin family and marker of neurogenic inflammation.
|
8-10 am on the day following periodontal status assessment.
|
|
Gingival crevicular fluid/peri-implant sulcular fluid Level of Calcitonin gene-related peptide
Time Frame: 8-10 am on the day following periodontal status assessment.
|
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), another neuropeptide derived from peptidergic nerves and a marker of neurogenic inflammation.
|
8-10 am on the day following periodontal status assessment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- OMU KAEK 2011/752
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.