To Evaluate the Use of Bioresorbable Tephaflex™ Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence (Tephaflex)

September 13, 2018 updated by: Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa

Prospective Study to Evaluate Use of TephaFLEX™ Sling Implanted Via a Retropubic Mid-urethral Sling Procedure for Treatment of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a major public health issue affecting up to 25-50% of all women and has a detrimental impact on patient quality of life. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common form of urinary incontinence and is defined as the leakage of urine, which occurs during physical activity of exertion or on sneezing or coughing. It has been reported that the prevalence of SUI is 25 to 45% of the female population. If pelvic floor exercises are not effective, mid-urethral slings (MUS) are widely used as a first-line surgical treatment. Subjective and objective cure rates of 91% and 85% respectively have been reported for retropubic midurethral slings.

Midurethral slings are commonly made of polypropylene (PP). Although the polypropylene products are effective and have relatively low rates of adverse events, the adverse events that do occur, like exposure and pain, have been related to the fact that a permanent synthetic mesh is implanted. Mesh-related complications are difficult to manage and may even involve partial or complete removal of the implant.

Clinically, there is a need to investigate whether mid-urethral sling surgery can be performed with a non-permanent mesh made from a resorbable biomaterial, as an alternative for PP. Non-permanent meshes may be associated with fewer complications and better quality of life. However, before non-permanent and permanent mesh procedures can be compared, there is a need to first establish the feasibility of using a mesh in a mid-urethral sling procedure.

The investigators hypothesize that a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence, can be successfully performed using an implant made of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The overall objective of this study is to determine the preliminary safety and efficacy of resorbable TephaFLEX sling implanted via a retropubic procedure to treat SUI.

Prospective, observational single-center study with a follow-up of 24 months post-surgery. Up to 25 patients will be recruited at Groote Schuur Hospital Urogynecology Out-Patient Department. Eligible patients will receive a retropubic surgical producedure where a TephaFLEX sling, composed of the resorbable material P4HB, is placed. After the surgical procedure, follow-up visits are scheduled at 4-6 weeks, 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 6 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 1 month), and 24 months (+/- 1 month) post-procedure. TephaFLEX sling, manufactured by Tepha, Inc., will be implanted via a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure for treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence. The product is supplied as a sterile, single-use device. One device will be utilized per patient. TephaFLEX sling, developed specifically for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, is a single layer, bioresorbable, mesh made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament fiber. The mesh is constructed as a 11mm x 60cm tape with an open pore structure, and is enclosed in a polyethylene sleeve to ease insertion. The mesh was designed specifically to provide strength over the three-month critical wound healing period in soft tissue repair and reinforcement, and to encourage the proliferation of healthy tissue at the repair site. The product undergoes a gradual loss of strength after implantation and is essentially resorbed by 18 - 24 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • South Africa
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
        • Recruiting
        • Groote Schuur Academic Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephen Jeffery, MbChB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population are eligible women, older than 18 years of age, with demonstrable stress urinary incontinence who present to the Out-Patient Department for Urogynaecology at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town South Africa. Groote Schuur Hospital is a tertiary academic hospital and serves the city of Cape Town and surrounds.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Be female, = 18 years of age
  2. Female symptomatic (moderate or severe) SUI resulting from urethral hypermobility and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).
  3. Patients who have planned to undergo surgical correction of symptomatic SUI after consultation with their physician about the risks and benefits of such a procedure, and a determination by the physician that surgical treatment is the most appropriate treatment option for the patient.
  4. Understand and be willing to follow all aspects of the study protocol and have signed and dated the EC-approved Informed Consent prior to any study-related procedures being performed

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who have mixed or urge incontinence
  2. Subjects who have stage 2 or more genital prolapse, according to the ICS classification
  3. Subjects with previous surgery for SUI
  4. Subjects who undergo concomitant surgical procedures
  5. Subjects who are pregnant or want to become pregnant in the next 24 months
  6. Subjects who are not capable of giving informed consent
  7. Subjects with a BMI = 35 kg/m2
  8. Subjects diagnosed with a current urinary tract infection or chronic urinary tract infections (defined as 4 or more UTI in the last year)
  9. Subjects with known sensitivity to tetracycline or kanamycin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling for SUI
P4HB material ( TephaFlex ™) will be implanted in 25 women with confirmed Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI).
Device: TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling
The sling is made from P4HB material. It is placed in a similar technique to standard retropubic sling procedures, but will resorb over 18-24 months post surgery.
Other Names:
  • P4HB mid-urethral bioresorbable sling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device safety will be established by measuring the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
Time Frame: 2 years
The retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure using UroFLEX sling is considered to be safe at 6 months after implantation if the number of serious adverse events comply with safety standards as defined by the safety criteria outlined below and analyzed using sequential analysis. The device will be considered safe at A) a maximum of 3 of the first 5 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (60%); B) a maximum of 5 of the first 10 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (50%); C) a maximum of 7 of the first 20 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (35%); D) a maximum of 8 of the first 25 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (32%).
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective cure measurement using Cough Stress Test
Time Frame: Measured at enrolment, 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years total)
Preliminary effectiveness will be assessed by measuring the number of patients that exhibit objective cure based on Cough Stress Test
Measured at enrolment, 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years total)
Subjective cure with PGI-I questionnaire Patient Global Impression of Improvement
Time Frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years total)
Number of patients that exhibit subjective cure based on PGI-I questionnaire.
Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years total)
Subjective cure with Sandvik scores (Incontinence severity index)
Time Frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years in total)
Number of patients showing subjective cure on Sandvik scores questionnaire
Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years in total)
Subjective cure with PISQ-IR- Sexual Function for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence and / or Fecal Incontinence questionnaire
Time Frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6,12,24 months post procedure (2 years in total)
Number of patients showing subjective cure using the PISQ-IR questionairre as measurement
Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6,12,24 months post procedure (2 years in total)
Subjective cure with Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
Time Frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3,6,12 and 24 months post procedure ( 2 years in total)
Number of patients showing subjective cure using the UDI-6
Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3,6,12 and 24 months post procedure ( 2 years in total)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Cape Town

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jan-Paul Roovers, MD, Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • URO001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings