The Effect of Tablet Size on Cognitive Performance Caffeine (CaC)

April 15, 2019 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

The Effect of Tablet Size on Cognitive Performance: A Randomized Control Trial Using Caffeine

This study aims to assess if tablet size, due to placebo effect, alters participants' performance on cognitive tests after consuming caffeine. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) 90 mg caffeine with a 1 mm diameter sucrose pillule; 2) no caffeine with the small sucrose pillule; 3) 90 mg caffeine with a 5 mm sucrose pillule; 4) no caffeine with the large sucrose pillule.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background: A capsule's physical design (e.g. shape, size, and color) affects individuals' perception of drug efficacy; that is, how well a drug is likely to work. The goal of this study is to assess the effects tablet size may have on participant's performance on cognitive testing since research has found differences between preparation methods. Method: 120 participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) 90 mg caffeine with a 1 mm diameter sucrose pillule; 2) no caffeine with the small sucrose pillule; 3) 90 mg caffeine with a 5 mm sucrose pillule; 4) no caffeine with the large sucrose pillule. Participants will consume the designated placebo tablet with water (caffeinated or non-caffeinated); then, participants will provide weekly caffeine intake and complete the neutral portion of Velten's Mood Induction Procedure until 30 minutes have passed to allow for caffeine activation. Participants will complete the Stroop test, Trial Making Tests A and B, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Previous literature, as far as the author knows, relied on evaluating drug efficacy based on appearance alone. This study aims to assess if tablet size, due to placebo effect, alters participants' performance on cognitive tests after consuming caffeine.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • University of Colorado Denver

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fluent in written and spoken English
  • Ability to see color
  • No uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • No allergies to caffeine or sucrose
  • No history of heart disease
  • No untreated anxiety or depression
  • Non-pregnant
  • No caffeine consumed the day of participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in written and/or spoken English
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • Color-blindness
  • Allergies to caffeine and/or sucrose
  • History of heart disease
  • Untreated anxiety or depression
  • Pregnant
  • Consumed caffeine on the day of participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Caffeine with small sucrose pill
Participants will be given one dose of 90 milligrams caffeine anhydrous dissolved in 8 ounces of water and a 1 mm sucrose pill to consume in 10 minutes. After 30 minutes post-administration, the cognitive tests will be administered.
Drug: Caffeine Anhydrous with small sucrose pill
caffeine anhydrous that has been weighed out to 90 mg per dose presented with a 1 mm sucrose pillule
Other Names:
  • pure caffeine powder
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Caffeine with large sucrose pill
Participants will be given one dose of 90 milligrams caffeine anhydrous dissolved in 8 ounces of water and a 5 mm sucrose pill to consume in 10 minutes. After 30 minutes post-administration, the cognitive tests will be administered.
Drug: Caffeine Anhydrous with large sucrose pill
caffeine anhydrous that has been weighed out to 90 mg per dose presented with a 5 mm sucrose pillule
Other Names:
  • pure caffeine powder
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: No caffeine with small sucrose pill
Participants will be given 8 ounces of water and a 1 mm sucrose pill to consume in 10 minutes. After 30 minutes post-administration, the cognitive tests will be administered.
Other: Placebo - small sucrose pill
sucrose pillules of 1 mm diameter will be given to all participants in the small pill groups
Other Names:
  • sugar pill
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: No caffeine with large sucrose pill
Participants will be given 8 ounces of water and a 1 mm sucrose pill to consume in 10 minutes. After 30 minutes post-administration, the cognitive tests will be administered.
Other: Placebo - large sucrose pill
sucrose pillules of 5 mm diameter will be given to all participants in the large pill groups
Other Names:
  • sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroop Color test
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 1.5 minutes
Measures processing speed. 100-item, time-trial task where participants read the color of printed items on the task paper as quickly as possible for 45 seconds. Scores are measured in the number of correct responses within the allotted time.
Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 1.5 minutes
Stroop Word test
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 1.5 minutes
Measures processing speed. 100-item, time-trial task where participants read color names printed on the task paper as quickly as possible for 45 seconds. Scores are measured in the number of correct responses within the allotted time.
Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 1.5 minutes
Trail Making task A
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 2 minutes
Measures processing speed. 25 item, time-trial task where participants must connect numbers in order as quickly as possible. Scores are measured by the amount of time (in seconds) for participants to complete the task.
Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 2 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroop Color-and-Word test
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 2 minutes
Measures processing speed. 100-item, time-trial task where participants must read the color of the ink instead of color names printed on the task paper as quickly as possible for 45 seconds. Scores are measured in the number of correct responses within the allotted time.
Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 2 minutes
Trail Making task B
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 3 minutes
Measures processing speed. 25 item, time-trial task where participants must connect numbers and letters in order (e.g. 1-A-2-B, etc.) as quickly as possible. Scores are measured by the amount of time (in seconds) for participants to complete the task.
Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 3 minutes
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 40 minutes
Measures memory. 30-item, 2 section task where participants are read 15 words and asked to recall as many words as possible in the first section. A second set of 15 words is then introduced and participants recall those. The second section consists of revisiting the original set of words and recalling as many of those. Scores are measured by the total words remembered in section one, and another score for the total intrusions from the second list into the recall of section two.
Within 90 minutes of receiving informed consent. Actual task time: approximately 40 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Colorado, Denver

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Hernandez Altamirano, Undergraduate honors student

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 31, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18-1086

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings