Software Interventions for Improving Hand Washing and Sanitation in Rural Tanzania: an Impact Evaluation

March 8, 2022 updated by: Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgium

Effect of Two add-on Software Interventions for Improving Hand Washing and Sanitation in Rural Tanzania: an Impact Evaluation

BACKGROUND. Diarrhea is ubiquitous, particularly among people in low- and middle-income countries. Unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation, and insufficient hygiene are responsible for nearly 90% of diarrhea-related mortalities. Despite extensive knowledge that has been obtained in recent years, there is no consensus as to the most efficacious approach to improve Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene behavior and health. With this study, we want to determine whether multi-faceted contextualized and non-contextualized WASH interventions have a differential impact.

OBJECTIVES. The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of a contextualized and non-contextualized add-on intervention for improving hand washing (HW) behavior. Secondary objectives include the impact on latrine use, health, coverage of HW and latrine infrastructure, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Tanzania
      • Kigoma, Tanzania
        • Tanzania Red Cross Society

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All people above 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: RANAS
Hardware CLTS+PHAST RANAS (contextualized)
Other: Hardware
Community sessions will be provided to each of the sub-villages (n=27) teaching participants how to build a tippy tap, how to build an improved latrine, and how to make liquid soap. In addition, an existing water gravity flow scheme will be rehabilitated and extended, 350 tippy taps and 350 pans for pour flush latrines will be distributed, and sanitation blocks will be built in four schools. Within these schools, SWASH school hygiene clubs will be organized.
Behavioral: CLTS
CLTS sanitation and HW sessions will be given. A first session will focus on sanitation, covering 7 exercises: 1) sanitation or social map, 2) transect walk, 3) shit calculation, 4) medical expenses, 5) shit flow diagram, and 6) water/shit demo, 7) community declaration. A second session will focus on HW, involving 10 exercises: 1) anal cleansing materials, 2) shit and shake, 3) cassava/egg demonstration, 4) charcoal smearing, 5) smelly hands, 6) feces on baby nappies, 7) scratch & smell, 8) wall contamination, 9) food sharing, 10) dirt under fingernails. These sessions will take approximately 3-5 hours each. Follow-up community meetings and household visits will take place to monitor improvement.
Behavioral: PHAST
PHAST sessions are based on the 'PHAST step-by-step guide: A participatory approach for the control of diarrhoeal disease' of the World Health Organization. Considering the overlap with some CLTS activities, only a selection of the full guideline will be enrolled, namely: 1) Health problems in our community, 2) Good and bad hygiene behaviors, 3) Investigating community practices, 4) How diseases spread, 5) Blocking the spread of disease, 6) Selecting the barriers, 7) Choosing sanitation improvements, and 8) Choosing improved hygiene behaviors. These 8 activities will be enrolled in approximately 40 community groups. Each activity will take between 30 minutes - 2 hours to complete.
Behavioral: RANAS
Nine household visits of 20-40 min each will be offered at a frequency of one visit every two months. The content of these add-on visits is based on the RANAS manual: 'Systematic Behavior Change in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene - A practical guide to using the RANAS approach' (www.ranasmosler.com). First, baseline data is gathered through a questionnaire to better understand the context that is at play. Next, this data is analyzed in a do'er non-do'er analysis. Only those behavioral factors that are significantly different between do'ers and non-do'ers will be included in the intervention, as these are, at least theoretically, considered to be decisive for HW and latrine use behavior in the current setting.
EXPERIMENTAL: Mini-RANAS
Hardware CLTS+PHAST mini-RANAS (norms)
Other: Hardware
Community sessions will be provided to each of the sub-villages (n=27) teaching participants how to build a tippy tap, how to build an improved latrine, and how to make liquid soap. In addition, an existing water gravity flow scheme will be rehabilitated and extended, 350 tippy taps and 350 pans for pour flush latrines will be distributed, and sanitation blocks will be built in four schools. Within these schools, SWASH school hygiene clubs will be organized.
Behavioral: CLTS
CLTS sanitation and HW sessions will be given. A first session will focus on sanitation, covering 7 exercises: 1) sanitation or social map, 2) transect walk, 3) shit calculation, 4) medical expenses, 5) shit flow diagram, and 6) water/shit demo, 7) community declaration. A second session will focus on HW, involving 10 exercises: 1) anal cleansing materials, 2) shit and shake, 3) cassava/egg demonstration, 4) charcoal smearing, 5) smelly hands, 6) feces on baby nappies, 7) scratch & smell, 8) wall contamination, 9) food sharing, 10) dirt under fingernails. These sessions will take approximately 3-5 hours each. Follow-up community meetings and household visits will take place to monitor improvement.
Behavioral: PHAST
PHAST sessions are based on the 'PHAST step-by-step guide: A participatory approach for the control of diarrhoeal disease' of the World Health Organization. Considering the overlap with some CLTS activities, only a selection of the full guideline will be enrolled, namely: 1) Health problems in our community, 2) Good and bad hygiene behaviors, 3) Investigating community practices, 4) How diseases spread, 5) Blocking the spread of disease, 6) Selecting the barriers, 7) Choosing sanitation improvements, and 8) Choosing improved hygiene behaviors. These 8 activities will be enrolled in approximately 40 community groups. Each activity will take between 30 minutes - 2 hours to complete.
Behavioral: mini-RANAS
Nine household visits of 20-40 min each will be offered at a frequency of one visit every two months. The content of the mini-RANAS add-on intervention is based on the 'Norm Behavior Change Techniques' from the RANAS manual 'Systematic Behavior Change in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene - A practical guide to using the RANAS approach' (www.ranasmosler.com). During the mini-RANAS household visits, emphasis will be put on norms and volunteers will encourage participants to become a role model by improving HW and sanitation infrastructure and behavior.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
Hardware CLTS+PHAST Placebo
Other: Hardware
Community sessions will be provided to each of the sub-villages (n=27) teaching participants how to build a tippy tap, how to build an improved latrine, and how to make liquid soap. In addition, an existing water gravity flow scheme will be rehabilitated and extended, 350 tippy taps and 350 pans for pour flush latrines will be distributed, and sanitation blocks will be built in four schools. Within these schools, SWASH school hygiene clubs will be organized.
Behavioral: CLTS
CLTS sanitation and HW sessions will be given. A first session will focus on sanitation, covering 7 exercises: 1) sanitation or social map, 2) transect walk, 3) shit calculation, 4) medical expenses, 5) shit flow diagram, and 6) water/shit demo, 7) community declaration. A second session will focus on HW, involving 10 exercises: 1) anal cleansing materials, 2) shit and shake, 3) cassava/egg demonstration, 4) charcoal smearing, 5) smelly hands, 6) feces on baby nappies, 7) scratch & smell, 8) wall contamination, 9) food sharing, 10) dirt under fingernails. These sessions will take approximately 3-5 hours each. Follow-up community meetings and household visits will take place to monitor improvement.
Behavioral: PHAST
PHAST sessions are based on the 'PHAST step-by-step guide: A participatory approach for the control of diarrhoeal disease' of the World Health Organization. Considering the overlap with some CLTS activities, only a selection of the full guideline will be enrolled, namely: 1) Health problems in our community, 2) Good and bad hygiene behaviors, 3) Investigating community practices, 4) How diseases spread, 5) Blocking the spread of disease, 6) Selecting the barriers, 7) Choosing sanitation improvements, and 8) Choosing improved hygiene behaviors. These 8 activities will be enrolled in approximately 40 community groups. Each activity will take between 30 minutes - 2 hours to complete.
Other: Placebo poster
One household visit will be offered. During this visit, a placebo poster will be distributed focusing on first aid. The topics to be discussed are burns, cuts and grazes. The main goal of this household visit is to avoid jealousy among the control cohort.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hand washing behavior
Time Frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

The primary outcome is the percentage of households washing hands. The outcome measure will be obtained by means of a self-developed WASH questionnaire, which involves both multiple choice questions and spot checks.

A household was defined to have correct HW behavior when they: 1) have a HW station available (spot check), 2) have water and soap available at the HW station (spot check), and 3) indicate to wash their hands with water and soap (questionnaire). The analysis will be repeated for each of the critical times. Critical times of interest include: after defecation or using the latrine, before cooking or handling food, before eating, and before feeding a child.
The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in latrine use behavior
Time Frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

Latrine use is assessed by means of a self-developed WASH questionnaire, involving both multiple choice questions and spot checks.

A household is defined to have correct latrine use behavior when: 1) they have a latrine available (spot check), 2) the latrine minimally includes walls, a roof, a door or curtain, and a slab or concrete floor (spot check), 3) the latrine is clean (spot check), 3) they indicate to normally use the latrine when defecating at home (questionnaire), and 4) they indicate to not defecate in the open when they are at home (questionnaire). A similar analysis will be performed for latrine use behavior when people are elsewhere.
The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Quality of the hand washing infrastructure
Time Frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Hand washing infrastructure is assessed using a self-developed questionnaire and spot checks. The quality of the HW infrastructure is scored based on the type of HW facility (i.e. running water vs. bucket) (spot check), the presence of water and/or soap (spot check), and whether or not the station is always operational (questionnaire).
The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Change in health
Time Frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Health is assessed using a self-developed health questionnaire. The questionnaire is used to probe the prevalence rates of diarrhea, vomiting, limitations of daily activities, and need for medical care due to diarrheal illness in the past two weeks. The questionnaire also probes about the prevalence rates of hospitalization due to diarrheal illness in the past twelve months. Prevalence is subdivided into people below 5 years of age and people above 5 years of age. In some questions, a distinction was also made between men and women.
The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Change in EQ-5D-3L
Time Frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
The EQ-5D-3L is a validated questionnaire, examining 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. All items are scored on a 3-point Likert scale. Results of the EQ-5D-3L can be used to calculate the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a generic measure of disease burden. The QALY will be used to determine the cost-effectiveness of each intervention arm.
The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Quality of the latrine infrastructure
Time Frame: The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.
Latrine infrastructure is assessed using a self-developed questionnaire and spot checks. The quality of the latrine infrastructure is scored based on the type of facility (i.e. does it have a roof, a door, etc.) (spot check), the cleanliness (spot check), and the number of people who use the latrine (questionnaire). Information about whether or not the pit has ever been emptied, and how will also be gathered (questionnaire) as this will allow for the measurement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 according to the WHO/UNICEF JMP (https://washdata.org/) tools.
The outcome is measured at baseline, and after 1 and 2 years of intervention. In addition, a measurement will occur 1 year after the intervention has finished to see whether improvements have been maintained.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgium

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
Tanzania Red Cross Society

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 23, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TAN-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diarrhea

Clinical Trials on Hardware

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings