Fecal Microbiota Therapy Vs 5-aminosalicylates for Induction of Remission in Newly Diagnosed Mild-moderately Active UC

February 10, 2019 updated by: Ajit Sood, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital

Fecal Microbiota Therapy Vs 5-aminosalicylates for Induction of Remission in Newly Diagnosed Mild-moderately Active UC : a Pilot Study

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory disease of the colon that is characterized by abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea. The pathogenesis of UC involves a complex interplay of genetic factors, immune dysregulation and environmental triggers. Conventional therapies for UC (including 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and biologics) focus on altering the immune response by suppression of immune cells. However, the primary pathogenic mechanism underlying UC maybe gut microbiota dysbiosis and a dysfunctional intestinal barrier resulting in an aberrant host immune response. Several studies have shown reduced microbial diversity in UC patients with under representation of anti-inflammatory phyla (Bacteroides and Firmicutes), and a relative increase of pro-inflammatory phyla (Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria). Motivated by this, therapies targeting intestinal dysbiosis (prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)) have thus been tried in patients with UC. Though several case series and subsequently four high quality randomized controlled trails have established the efficacy of FMT in induction of remission in active UC, all these studies have used it as an add-on therapy, along with the previously ongoing conventional therapies. The investigators aim to assess the safety and efficacy of FMT as the sole modality for induction of remission in patients with newly diagnosed active UC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial. Newly diagnosed treatment naive patients with mild to moderately severe UC will be recruited (n=15). The patients will be randomized into 3 groups; i.e group I (n=5): FMT with placebo, group II (n=5): FMT with mesalamine, group III (n=5): Placebo infusion with mesalamine. The patients will undergo colonoscopic administration of fecal slurry (groups I and II) or placebo (group III) at weeks 0,2,6,10 and 14. Mesalamine will be administered in a dose of 4g/day. In case of clinical worsening during the study, a short course of steroids will be added. The primary end point will be clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, all subscores ≤ 1) at week 14. Secondary end points will be achievement of endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score 0) and histological remission (Nancy grade 0, 1) at the end of 14 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Punjab
      • Ludhiana, Punjab, India, 141001
        • Recruiting
        • Dayanand Medical College and Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ajit Sood, DM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active UC:

    1. UC diagnosed based on history of chronic (>4 weeks), inflammatory (with blood and mucous) diarrhoea
    2. Total Mayo Score 4-10, Mayo endoscopic sub-score of >1
    3. Histopathology suggestive of UC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe UC (Total Mayo 11-12, Endoscopic Mayo Score 3)
  • Uncertainty about diagnosis of UC : Infective colitis/ Indeterminate Colitis/ Crohn's Colitis
  • Associated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
  • Past history of surgery or colorectal surgery
  • Exposure to antibiotics or probiotics in the last 4 weeks
  • Patients with evidence of infections like C. difficile, cytomegalovirus, HIV, parasitic infections or extra-intestinal infections requiring antibiotics.
  • Significant cardiopulmonary co-morbidities (high risk for repeated colonoscopy)
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to consent for repeated colonoscopies.

Donor

  • Single donor (voluntary healthy individual) after informed consent

  • Inclusion criteria for donor

    • No personal or family history of UC or any other autoimmune disease or malignancy
    • Screened by stool microscopy and culture for common detectable enteric pathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Vibrio cholera, E. coli, Clostridium difficile, Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium) at the start of the study and every 4 weeks thereafter.
    • Negative for antibodies against hepatitis A, C and E, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

  • Exclusion criteria for donor

    • High-risk sexual behaviors
    • Communicable illnesses
    • Antibiotic treatment within the past 3 months
    • Intrinsic gastrointestinal illnesses such as irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal malignancies or major gastrointestinal surgical procedures
    • Ongoing immune-modulator therapy for any concurrent illness
    • Chronic pain syndromes
    • Neurologic/neurodevelopmental disorders
    • Metabolic syndrome
    • Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2)
    • Malignant illnesses
  • Donor's diet will be monitored with a diet diary.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: FMT Vs Placebo
Fecal microbiota transplantation (fresh sample, colonoscopic administration at weeks 0,2,6,10,14) plus placebo granules (4g/day)
Biological: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Freshly passed stools (80 g) will be diluted with normal saline (200 ml) and homogenized using a blender, filtered, filled into 4 syringes (50 ml each) and used within 1 hour of preparation or 6 hours of passage of stools. Polyethylene glycol lavage will be done for bowel preparation and the slurry administered into the ileum and/or caecum by colonoscopy. Post FMT, recipients will be encouraged to retain the slurry for 4-6 hours. FMT sessions will be scheduled at weeks 0,2,6,10,14.
Other: Placebo granules
Granules resembling mesalamine granules, 4 grams a day
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: FMT Vs Mesalamine
Fecal microbiota transplantation (fresh sample, colonoscopic administration at weeks 0,2,6,10,14) plus mesalamine granules (4g/day)
Biological: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Freshly passed stools (80 g) will be diluted with normal saline (200 ml) and homogenized using a blender, filtered, filled into 4 syringes (50 ml each) and used within 1 hour of preparation or 6 hours of passage of stools. Polyethylene glycol lavage will be done for bowel preparation and the slurry administered into the ileum and/or caecum by colonoscopy. Post FMT, recipients will be encouraged to retain the slurry for 4-6 hours. FMT sessions will be scheduled at weeks 0,2,6,10,14.
Drug: Mesalamine Granules
Mesalamine granules 4 grams a day
Other Names:
  • Rowasa
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Placebo Infusion Vs Mesalamine
Placebo infusion (colonoscopic administration at weeks 0,2,6,10,14) plus mesalamine granules (4g/day)
Drug: Mesalamine Granules
Mesalamine granules 4 grams a day
Other Names:
  • Rowasa
Other: Placebo infusion
Water with food grade colour to resemble fecal slurry

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission
Time Frame: Week 14
Mayo score ≤2, each subscore ≤1
Week 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response
Time Frame: Weeks 0,2,6,10,14
Reduction of Mayo score ≥30% and ≥3 points compared to baseline
Weeks 0,2,6,10,14
Endoscopic remission
Time Frame: Week 14
Endoscopic Mayo subscore 0
Week 14
Histological remission
Time Frame: Week 14
Nancy grade 0 or 1
Week 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dayanand Medical College and Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Colitis & Crohn's Foundation (India)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ajit Sood, DM, Professor and Head Gastroenterology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018-362

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings