Effect of Noninvasive Electrical Brain Stimulation on Memory at Different Times of Day in Younger and Older Adults

April 17, 2024 updated by: University of Chicago

Effect of Noninvasive Electrical Brain Stimulation on Memory Performance at Different Times of Day in Younger and Older Adults

This study will investigate the extent to which tDCS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (or dlPFC) impacts memory performance as a function of time-of-day in younger and older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is the safest and most accessible, non-invasive brain stimulation technique available for testing causal links between different brain regions and functions, by manipulating cognitive abilities. By identifying key experimental factors that can improve the reliability and robustness of stimulation effects on cognitive performance in different age groups, this project should lead to the widespread adoption of these design features in future applications. This study will investigate the extent to which tDCS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (or dlPFC) impacts recollection accuracy and working memory performance as a function of time-of-day in younger and older adults. Moreover, this study will test the extent that tDCS to dlPFC impacts memory performance by impacting information-specific processes and/or cognitive control processes that operate across different types of information, thereby informing basic theories of how dlPFC contributes to memory in younger and older adults.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
271

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Tesnim Arar

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed (according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
  • Normal or corrected vision
  • Fluent in English (started learning by age 6)
  • Ability to understand and provide informed consent for study procedures, and to comply - with study procedures for the entire length of the study.
  • For individuals in the 'younger adults' group, must be between 18 and 30 years of age
  • For individuals in the 'older adults' group, must be between 60 and 75 years of age
  • A score of 23 or above on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (out of 30, education-corrected) is required. This is to minimize the inclusion of suspected mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, targeting individuals that score in the normal range according to the recent meta-analysis of MoCA's ability to differentiate normal aging from MCI in Carson et al. (2018, Int. J of Geriatric Psychiatry).
  • Performance above threshold on the episodic memory task during the baseline session. The threshold is defined as having a hit rate that is at least 5% greater than the false alarm rate, where hit rate is defined as the number of studied items identified as studied, divided by the total number of studied items, and false alarm rate is defined as the number of new items identified as studied, divided by the total number of new items. We don't anticipate this threshold to exclude many, if any subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropsychological conditions associated with cognitive decline or seizure
  • Cochlear implants or metal in the brain/skull (except titanium)
  • Psychoactive medications, or diagnosis of depression, bipolar disorder, or any psychotic diagnoses
  • History of excessive use (clinically treated) alcohol or narcotics
  • Hospitalization for head trauma (e.g. concussions) in the past 5 years
  • Individuals above a threshold score on an assessment of depression, specifically, a score of 10 or above on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)(Manea et al., 2012)
  • Risk of pregnancy
  • Low tolerance of skin irritation
  • Prior brain stimulation experience (self-report)
  • Ongoing cognitive or sensory deficits/symptoms from a previous (or current) COVID-19 infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Older, active tDCS, dlPFC

Older adults (ages 60-75) randomized to this arm will receive 2 sessions of active tDCS stimulation (Soterix Medical) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. One session will occur in the morning (8 or 9am) and one will occur on a separate day in the afternoon (3 or 4pm).

2.
Device: Active tDCS
The brain is stimulated for 20 minutes with mild electrical current (maximum 2 mA) with two 7 cm x 5 cm electrodes placed on the scalp, using a standard 1x1 tDCS Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medica, NY), specialized for double-blinding.
Sham Comparator: Older, sham tDCS, dlPFC
Older adults (ages 60-75) randomized to this arm will receive 2 sessions of sham tDCS stimulation (Soterix Medical) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. One session will occur in the morning (8 or 9am) and one will occur on a separate day in the afternoon (3 or 4pm).
Device: Sham tDCS
The brain is not stimulated for 20 minutes with mild electrical current, but instead a sham procedure is administered using a standard 1x1 tDCS Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medica, NY), specialized for double-blinding.
Experimental: Younger, active tDCS, dlPFC
Younger adults (ages 18-30) randomized to this arm will receive 2 sessions of active tDCS stimulation (Soterix Medical) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. One session will occur in the morning (8 or 9am) and one will occur on a separate day in the afternoon (3 or 4pm).
Device: Active tDCS
The brain is stimulated for 20 minutes with mild electrical current (maximum 2 mA) with two 7 cm x 5 cm electrodes placed on the scalp, using a standard 1x1 tDCS Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medica, NY), specialized for double-blinding.
Sham Comparator: Younger, sham tDCS, dlPFC/parietal
Younger adults (ages 18-30) randomized to this arm will receive 2 sessions of sham tDCS stimulation (Soterix Medical) delivered to either the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (area F3 using the 10-20 EEG system, n = 25), or the left parietal cortex (area P5 using the 10-20 EEG system, n = 25). One session will occur in the morning (8 or 9am) and one will occur on a separate day in the afternoon (3 or 4pm).
Device: Sham tDCS
The brain is not stimulated for 20 minutes with mild electrical current, but instead a sham procedure is administered using a standard 1x1 tDCS Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medica, NY), specialized for double-blinding.
Active Comparator: Younger, active tDCS, parietal cortex
Younger adults (ages 18-30) randomized to this arm will receive 2 sessions of active tDCS stimulation (Soterix Medical) delivered to the left parietal cortex (area P5 using the 10-20 EEG system). One session will occur in the morning (8 or 9am) and one will occur on a separate day in the afternoon (3 or 4pm).
Device: Active tDCS
The brain is stimulated for 20 minutes with mild electrical current (maximum 2 mA) with two 7 cm x 5 cm electrodes placed on the scalp, using a standard 1x1 tDCS Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medica, NY), specialized for double-blinding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Episodic Memory Performance
Time Frame: This task is performed immediately after tDCS is administered, and lasts approximately 20 minutes.
To measure episodic memory performance, participants will perform a recollection task. They will first study picture and word stimuli (encoding phase). On the subsequent memory test (retrieval phase), participants will be asked to differentiate between studied and non-studied items, as well as recollecting the previous format for studied items (i.e. recollecting the picture or word). For each tested item, participants will also be asked to make a confidence judgement about their response. The primary dependent variable (DV) will be the proportion of studied items attributed to the correct source minus the proportion of nonstudied items incorrectly attributed to that same source.
This task is performed immediately after tDCS is administered, and lasts approximately 20 minutes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working Memory Performance
Time Frame: This task lasts approximately 10 minutes and is performed immediately after the episodic memory task (approximately 20 minutes after the end of the tDCS session).
To measure working memory performance, participants will perform two versions of the N-back task -- a verbal version (i.e., presenting the numbers 1-9 in a varied sequence) and a visuospatial version (i.e., presenting a colored square in one of 9 locations on a 3x3 grid in a varied sequence). The primary DV will be working memory accuracy: proportion of targets correctly identified minus the proportion of lures incorrectly endorsed.
This task lasts approximately 10 minutes and is performed immediately after the episodic memory task (approximately 20 minutes after the end of the tDCS session).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Chicago

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Galllo, University of Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB18-1246
  • R21AG060444 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will post data on the Open Science Framework (online), so that de-identified data will be made available to any outside researcher. Shared data will include, at a minimum, an excel data file used to summarize all participant cognitive data. Any computer scripts or stimuli used for task development also will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Study data will become available within 6 months of publication of the relevant results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigators will use the Open Science Framework for making data available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings