Penile Length Restoration in Men With Diabetes Mellitus, Type II

February 17, 2023 updated by: Matthew (Matt) J. Ziegelmann, Mayo Clinic
The objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy of a novel penile traction device in restoring lost penile length in men with type 2 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Men with diabetes mellitus experience sexual dysfunctions at an earlier age and higher rate compared to men without diabetes. One of these sexual dysfunctions includes diminished penile length. It is currently unknown if the decreased length is due to earlier erectile dysfunction or secondary to diabetes itself. Penile traction therapy is one of several treatments which have been used historically to treat decreased penile length, however, to date, no studies have evaluated the role of traction therapy in men with diabetes. To accomplish the study, a population of men from Mayo Clinic with a diagnosis of diabetes, type II will be enrolled and will be randomized to utilize the device for varying amounts of time. Outcomes will be assessed at the 3 and 6 month time points, and the results are to be used with the intent to publish in a scientific journal.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Men with Diabetes Mellitus, Type II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any evidence of end-organ failure attributed to DM (assessed based on medical history / patient history alone)
  • Loss of fingers / toes.
  • CKD Stage IV or greater.
  • Retinopathy
  • Myocardial infarction.
  • Cerebrovascular accident.
  • Indwelling penile prosthesis or prior history of penile prosthesis.
  • Peyronie's disease at baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Group 1: Control
No treatment will be administered for the entirety of the study (6 months)
Experimental: Group 2: Treatment
PTT for 30 min 2x/ day x 3 months, followed by no treatment x 3 months
Device: RestoreX PTT - 3 months
Penile traction therapy in straight position for first phase (3 months)
Experimental: Group 3: Treatment
PTT for 30 min 2x/day x 3 months, followed by once weekly (30 minutes) x 3 months
Device: RestoreX PTT - 6 months
Penile traction therapy in straight position for all 6 months.
Experimental: Group 4: Treatment
PTT for 30 min 2x day x 6 months
Device: RestoreX PTT - 6 months
Penile traction therapy in straight position for all 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Penile Length Change Between Baseline and Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Primary objective of this study is to assess penile length pre and post completion of RestoreX traction therapy compared to control groups (no treatment) of Diabetes Type II patients. Measurements were obtained at baseline and 6 months post-prostatectomy.
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Compliance With Traction Therapy
Time Frame: 6 months
Records of use from daily journals
6 months
Patient Reported Satisfaction With Traction Therapy at 6 Months.
Time Frame: 6 months
Likert scale used to assess self-reported overall satisfaction; 1-10 (10 = maximum satisfaction); higher values signify a better outcome. Satisfaction was assessed at 6 months post-prostatectomy.
6 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events With Use of RestoreX
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-prostatectomy
Adverse events were assessed at 3- and 6-months post-prostatectomy, with results summed and reported as a total.
3 and 6 months post-prostatectomy
Number of Participants With De-novo Peyronie's Disease Development
Time Frame: 6 months
Subjective question to determine if the patient has developed any new penile curvature, indentation, deformity, or other findings consistent with Peyronie's Disease during the study period
6 months
Subjective Comparison of Changes in Penile Length
Time Frame: 6 months
Subjective questions on patient perceived improvement in length (yes/no, qualitative [large, medium, small, none]); note that some groups add to >100% due to the effects of rounding.
6 months
Erectile Function Among Groups - Evaluating Change From Baseline to 6 Months.
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Standardized questionnaire assessment of erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function standardized questionnaire, Erectile Function Domain [questions 1-5 and 15]). Higher scores are better. Assessments were obtained at baseline and at 6 months post-prostatectomy with the result reported being 6 months minus baseline. Minimum score for the change since baseline = -29 (i.e. 1 minus 30), maximum score = 29 (i.e. 30 minus 1)
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Ziegelmann, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18-006696

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on RestoreX PTT - 3 months

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings