Cholangioscopy in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)

January 20, 2023 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation
To demonstrate the clinical utility of the addition of per oral cholangioscopy (POCS) to standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with brushing cytology for diagnosis and early detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the clinical utility of the addition of per oral cholangioscopy (POCS) to standard ERCP with brushing cytology for diagnosis and early detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3H 0V5
        • Aspen Woods Clinic
  • Netherlands
      • Amsterdam-Zuidoost, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academic Medical Center
  • Norway
      • Oslo, Norway, 0372
        • Rikshospitalet University Hospital
  • United States
    • California
      • Davis, California, United States, 95616
        • Sutter Davis Hospital
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • UC Davis Health
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Hospital and Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with PSC

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of PSC
  2. Clinical indication for ERCP per local standard of practice, such as suspicion of potential malignancy based on worsening cholestatic values or clinical presentation (such as itching, cholangitis) or new biliary stricture on trans-abdominal imaging (MRI/MRCP, US or CT) or suspicious cytology
  3. Diameter of bile ducts deemed sufficient to accommodate the cholangioscopy system based on imaging performed prior to scheduled ERCP
  4. Written informed consent from patient to participate in the study, including compliance with study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindication for an ERCP or POCS
  2. History of liver transplantation
  3. Mass/metastasis extrinsic to the bile duct identifiable on diagnostic imaging
  4. History of iatrogenic bile duct trauma, including biliary surgery within 6 months of enrollment
  5. INR > 1.5 or platelets count < 50,000
  6. Age < 18 years
  7. Pregnant women or women trying to become pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Consented, enrolled PSC patients undergoing ERCP + SpyGlass
Patients with PSC who have been consented and enrolled in the study will undergo ERCP with the addition of SpyGlass as indicated by their treating physician.
Device: SpyGlass DS I - II
The SpyScope™ DS Access and Delivery Catheter (SpyScope™ DS Catheter) is a sterile, single-use endoscope that enables access and delivery of accessories to targeted pancreaticobiliary anatomy and displays live video when connected to a Spy Glass DS Digital Controller.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of POCS visualization for Early Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma
Time Frame: 12 months
Diagnostic accuracy of POCS visualization for cholangiocarcinoma evaluated clinically at 12 months after initial POCS procedure by clinical presentation.
12 months
POCS-guided Biopsy for Early Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma
Time Frame: 12 months
Diagnostic accuracy for POCS-guided Biopsy for cholangiocarcinoma evaluated on pathology at 12 months after initial POCS procedure.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success - Ability to advance the scope.
Time Frame: Baseline
Ability to advance the cholangioscope to the target stricture, ability to visualize the stricture and ability to obtain a tissue sample with Spy Bite where applicable.
Baseline
Rate of Adverse Events
Time Frame: From index through study completion, an average of one year
Serious adverse events from initial POCS procedure until end of follow-up.
From index through study completion, an average of one year
Proportion of patients identified for repeat procedure.
Time Frame: During index procedure
Proportion of patients identified for repeat procedure considering the addition of Spy Glass DS visualization and Spy Bite biopsy at Index compared to the proportion identified for repeat procedure without consideration of Spy Glass DS visualization and Spy Bite biopsy at Index.
During index procedure
Correspondence of Biopsies
Time Frame: From index through study completion, an average of one year
Correlation between histopathology of Spy Bite biopsies collected during the initial POCS procedure and final diagnosis.
From index through study completion, an average of one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Scientific Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Johannes Eksteen, MD, PhD, Aspen Woods Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Douglas Adler, MD, University of Utah Hospital and Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Lars Aabakken, MD, PhD, Rikshospitalet Oslo University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Cyriel Ponsioen, MD, PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Principal Investigator: Sooraj Tejaswi, MD, PhD, Sutter Davis Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Bowlus, MD, PhD, UC Davis Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E7136

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings