Intranasal Versus Intravenous Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children With Non-operative Fractures

April 19, 2023 updated by: James Statler, University of Alabama at Birmingham
This a randomized clinical trial involving children with non-operative fractures presenting the emergency department randomized either to intranasal or intravenous ketamine.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine if Intranasal Ketamine (INK) is efficacious for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) when compared to Intravenous Ketamine (IVK) in children with non-operative fractures. The primary aim is to determine if INK provides non-inferior sedation to IVK as defined by a Modified Ramsay Sedation score of ≥ 4 and also to compare the proportion of successful procedure between two treatment groups. The secondary aim is to compare proportion of adverse events and compare duration of sedation and length of emergency department (ED) stay between treatment groups.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children 1-18 years of age.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II
  • Non-operative fracture requiring reduction
  • Body weight less than or equal to 25 kg as measured by standard weighing scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classification III or above
  • Age less than 1 year
  • History of hypertension, known coronary artery disease or Kawasaki disease, congestive heart failure, acute glaucoma or globe injury, increased intracranial pressure or intracranial mass lesion, acute porphyria, developmental delays, or major psychiatric disorder
  • Prior allergy to ketamine
  • Unavailable parent or guardian to provide consent
  • Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Intravenous ketamine
Participants randomized to IV ketamine will be receive IV ketamine and Intranasal normal saline.
Drug: Intravenous Ketamine
Subject randomized to IV Ketamine arm will receive IN Normal Saline at induction. After 8 minutes subjects will receive IV Ketamine (10 mg/mL) at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg. Level of sedation will be scored at the 15 minutes from induction to determine if adequate sedation has been achieved.
Experimental: Intranasal ketamine
Participants randomized to Intranasal Ketamine group will receive Intranasal ketamine and IV normal saline.
Drug: Intranasal Ketamine
Subject randomized to IN Ketamine arm will receive IN Ketamine (100 mg/mL) at a dose of 9 mg/kg at induction. After 8 minutes subjects will receive IV Normal Saline. Level of sedation will be scored at the 15 minutes from induction to determine if adequate sedation has been achieved.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Achieved Adequate Sedation.
Time Frame: Induction up to 10 minutes
Determine if IN ketamine provides non-inferior sedation to IV ketamine as defined by a Modified Ramsay Sedation score of ≥ 4. Modified Ramsay Sedation scale is used to evaluate levels of sedation. The scale range is from 0 to 6 with a higher score indicated deeper levels of sedation. At levels of 4 or greater is set to be satisfactory for deep sedation.
Induction up to 10 minutes
Percentage of Adequately Sedated Participants Successfully Completing the Procedure Without Requiring Rescue Medications.
Time Frame: From induction to discharge from sedation by emergency physician, up to 3 hours.
Rescue medication is defined as requiring additional doses of Ketamine to maintain adequate sedation. Successful procedure completion will be define as completing the procedure with only the induction dose and without requiring rescue medications.
From induction to discharge from sedation by emergency physician, up to 3 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events.
Time Frame: From induction to discharge from the emergency department.
Non-serious adverse events include allergic reaction, vomiting, emergence agitation, and oxygen desaturations.
From induction to discharge from the emergency department.
Duration of Sedation Using Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale.
Time Frame: From induction to discharge from sedation by the emergency physician.
Modified Ramsay Sedation scale is used to evaluate levels of sedation. The scale range is from 0 to 6 with a higher score indicated deeper levels of sedation. At levels of 2 or less is set to be satisfactory for discharge from sedation.
From induction to discharge from sedation by the emergency physician.
Duration of Emergency Department Stay.
Time Frame: From arrival to emergency department to discharge order entered by emergency physician.
Measured from time of arrival to emergency department to discharge order.
From arrival to emergency department to discharge order entered by emergency physician.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: James Statler, MD, Emory University
  • Principal Investigator: Judson Barber, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-300002731

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Intravenous Ketamine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings