Opioid Free and Therapy Minimized Advantages Using HANA Table for Total Hip Arthroplasty

October 21, 2020 updated by: Dr Andrew B. Wickline, St. Elizabeth Medical Center, Utica, NY
To prove that anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using the HANA table can be performed with little, if any, need for opioids using a combination of education, optimized pre op and post op pain protocols and optimized recovery tools.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Methods:

Data Collection:

  • pre-op assessment/physical therapy evaluation
  • post op assessment - PACU, phase II (Prior to discharge)
  • phone calls after discharge (post op day 1, 2, 3)
  • follow up assessment in surgeon's office (3 and 6 weeks post op)
  • Ortech
  • Swiftpath
  • HOOS jr

Pre-optimization:

  • All patients enroll in SwiftPath education program
  • Optimized BMI, hemoglobin, albumin, glucose control, A1C and blood pressure control

Total Joint procedure:

-anterior approach using the HANA table THA preformed with intra-articular block

Pain Management regimen:

  • Pre op PT teaching
  • post op multimodal pain regimen

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
207

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Utica, New York, United States, 13501
        • St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Males and females presenting seeking elective unilateral total hip arthoplasty that fall within inclusion criteria listed above

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective total hip arthroplasty
  • unilateral
  • patient surgeries scheduled to be performed at the hospital and surgery center
  • patients must enroll in SwiftPath
  • Ability to read and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disease, dementia
  • previous burn to affected extremity
  • BMI > 40
  • Hemoglobin <12 female, <13 male
  • Albumin less than 3.5
  • A1C >8.0

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-operative Narcotic Use
Time Frame: Pre-operatively
Percentage of patients that used used opioids pre-operatively
Pre-operatively
Number of Patients That Took Any Opioids Throughout 6-week Follow-up Period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Number of patients that took any opioids throughout 6-week follow-up period
6 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
Assessment tool measuring gait speed, balance and chair stand test. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
6 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Scores
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
A numeric pain score (0-10, 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain). This will be used to assess patients level of pain relating to opioid use and recovery. Both 'best' pain level and 'worst' pain level as reported by the patient will be reported.
6 Weeks
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
The percentage of patients where pain interrupts sleep 'never' or 'rarely' will be combined together and reported.
6 Weeks
Number of Participants Who Adhere to Prescribed Post op Recovery Protocol
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Number of Participants Who Adhere to Prescribed Post op Recovery Protocol collected via a questionnaire
2 weeks
Length of Stay in Hospital
Time Frame: 1 week
Average number of days in hospital after surgery
1 week
Number of Patients That Return to Work 6 Weeks After Surgery
Time Frame: 6 weeks
questionnaire asking the patient to report whether or not they have returned to employment and at what capacity (using Department of Labor physical employment scale). Patients will answer "yes" or "no" when asked if they have returned to work.
6 weeks
Number of Patients Who Return to Driving 6 Weeks After Surgery
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
Patients will respond yes or no when asked if they have resumed driving.
6 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
St. Elizabeth Medical Center, Utica, NY

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Wickline, MD, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • QIIIS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings