Acute Feasibility Investigation of a New S-ICD Electrode (ASE)

May 7, 2024 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

Acute Feasibility Investigation of a New S-ICD Electrode Arrangement for Reduction of Defibrillation Energies

This is an early-stage feasibility study. This study seeks to characterize the performance of the new electrode shock configuration with the S-ICD

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD, EMBLEM®, Boston Scientific Corp) delivers 80 J shocks from an 8 cm left-parasternal coil (LPC) to a 59 cc left lateral pulse generator (PG). A system that defibrillates with lower energy could significantly reduce PG size. Computer modeling and animal studies suggest a 2nd shock coil either parallel (P) to LPC or transverse (T) from xiphoid to PG pocket would significantly reduce shock impedance and defibrillation threshold (DFT).

Objective: Acutely test defibrillation efficacy of P and T configurations in patients receiving an S-ICD.

Methods: Testing was performed in patients receiving a conventional S-ICD system (C) for standard indications. Patients at risk for conversion failure, stroke or infection were excluded. A 65 J success with the conventional S-ICD was required prior to investigational testing. A second electrode was temporarily inserted from the xiphoid incision using the same introducer and sheath tools and connected to the PG with an investigational Y-adapter (Model 3598, Boston Scientific). Phase 1 (n=11) tested only P at a starting energy of 50 J with subsequent tests at 65 or 30 J then 40 or 20 J depending upon outcome. Phase 2 (n=21) tested both P and T in random order, starting at 30 J then either 40 or 20 J.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Academisch Medisch Centrum
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands
        • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam
      • Zwolle, Netherlands
        • Isala Klinieken

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is scheduled to receive a de novo S-ICD system implant per labeled indication.
  2. Passing S-ICD screening ECG performed per applicable user's manual.
  3. Subject is willing and capable of providing informed consent specific to local and national laws.
  4. Subject is age 18 or above, or of legal age to give informed consentspecific to local and national law.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has an unusual chest anatomy (eg. pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum) that might impede the ability to temporarily insert a second S-ICD electrode.
  2. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 20% within 3 months prior to enrollment.
  3. Subject has NYHA Class IV or unstable Class III heart failure.
  4. Subject that, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot tolerate the DFT testing required by this protocol.
  5. Subject is morbidly obese, defined as BMI ≥ 35.
  6. Subject has an active infection or has been treated for infection within the past 30 days.
  7. Subject that, in the opinion of the investigator, has an increased risk of infection.
  8. Subject is currently requiring/receiving dialysis.
  9. Subject has insulin-dependent diabetes.
  10. Subject had/has any prior or planned other surgical procedure within ±30 days of enrollment.
  11. Subject that, in the opinion of the investigator, has an increased risk for thromboembolic event.
  12. Subject that, in the opinion of the investigator, has an increased risk of excessive bleeding.
  13. Subject is currently on an active heart transplant list.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single Arm
Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing Arm
Device: commercially released subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) and the Investigational S-ICD Adapter.
The S-ICD System is a Subcutaneous (under the skin) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for people who are at risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest. A new electrode configuration will be tested for Defibrillation testing ( DFT). The unit of measure will be in Joules. VF will be induced and the device will deliver a shock at a certain defined energy level as described in the protocol
Other Names:
  • The S-ICD System is a Subcutaneous (under the skin) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for people who are at risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Defibrillation Threshold (DFT) of the New Shock Electrode Configuration in Joules
Time Frame: Acute- During the implant procedure- up to 1 hour
The primary objective of this acute feasibility study is to measure the DFT of the new shock electrode configuration with an S-ICD system. The unit of measure will be in Joules. Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) will be induced and the device will deliver a shock at a certain defined energy level as described in the protocol
Acute- During the implant procedure- up to 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Successful Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) Conversion at 40 Joules
Time Frame: Acute- During the implant procedure- up to 1 hour
The secondary objective is to assess the conversion success of the new electrode configuration to convert VF. VF will be induced and the device will deliver a shock at a certain defined energy level as described in the protocol
Acute- During the implant procedure- up to 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Scientific Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Reinoud Knops, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 29, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C2081

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on commercially released subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) and the Investigational S-ICD Adapter.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings