Evaluation of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and of Late Recurarization in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit in Patients Undergoing Videolaparoscopic Cholecystectomy

February 4, 2019 updated by: Renato Santiago Gomez, Federal University of Minas Gerais
Neuromuscular blockade is essential to provide optimal conditions for tracheal intubation and also to facilitate the performance of surgeries involving mainly the abdominal cavity. The introduction of neuromuscular blockers in clinical practice optimized the execution of mechanical ventilation. Since the use of these drugs, increased intercurrences such as prolonged muscle paralysis and respiratory complications have been observed, resulting in unfavorable outcomes with residual neuromuscular blockade and delayed recurrence due to the occurrence of these complications. The present study aims to evaluate the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and late recurarization in the post-anesthetic recovery room in patients submitted to videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an observational and prospective study in which patients aged 18-50 years classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I and II, body mass index below 35 and who will undergo cholecystectomy will be included. Patients will be allocated to two groups based on the neuromuscular blocker used by the anesthesiologist who participates in the surgery, ie in group C patients will participate in the administration of cisatracurium and the group R will consist of the patients in whom rocuronium was administered. General anesthesia and assessment of muscle function will be performed by measuring the four-stimulus sequence (SQE) / train of four (TOF) at pre-established times. A residual neuromuscular block is considered to be the patient presenting the value of the four-stimulus sequence of T4 / T1 of less than 0.9.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Minas Gerais
      • Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 30130100
        • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Cirurgia.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients of both sexes and who underwent videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) patients, class I and II, age group of 18 to 50 years, body mass index below 35.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients submitted to videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) patients, class I and II, age group of 18 to 50 years, body mass index below 35.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ASA III or higher; ASA II patients with respiratory comorbidities. Patients with neuromuscular diseases or severe renal or hepatic diseases. Patients submitted to total venous anesthesia. Patients with body temperature below 36 ° C. Replication of the neuromuscular blocker. Use of drugs that accentuate neuromuscular blockade such as calcium channel blockers, inorganic ions (Mg ++, Li ++), aminoglycoside antibiotics, halogenated anesthetics (except sevoflurane), local anesthetics (except lidocaine), benzodiazepines and opioids (except morphine or remifentanil) .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Grupo C: cisatracurium
Patients were allocated to two groups based on the neuromuscular blocker used by the anesthesiologist who participated in the surgery. In group C, patients received cisatracurium and in group R, rocuronium was administered to patients.
Drug: Cisatracurium
Patients were allocated to two groups based on the neuromuscular blocker used by the anesthesiologist participating in the surgery. In group C, the patients in whom cisatracurium was given and the R group consisted of the patients in whom rocuronium was administered. It is emphasized that the choice of the neuromuscular blocker was made by the preference and experience of the anesthesiologist of the case and not by randomization or lottery of the patients.
Other Names:
  • Rocuronium
Grupo R: rocuronium
Patients were allocated to two groups based on the neuromuscular blocker used by the anesthesiologist who participated in the surgery. In group C, patients received cisatracurium and in group R, rocuronium was administered to patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
Time Frame: Immediate postoperative period in the post anesthetic recovery room.
The patient who presented the value of the sequence of four T4 / T1 stimuli of less than 0.9 was considered to have residual neuromuscular block.
Immediate postoperative period in the post anesthetic recovery room.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of Minas Gerais

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAAE: 71086417.3.0000.5121

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings