Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Supervised Exercises in Lateral Epicondylitis
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Supervised Exercises in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The diagnosis of LE was made in the clinical examination, and the diagnosis was confirmed with the Southampton Diagnostic Criteria of "the presence of epicondyle pain, and epicondyle pain and tenderness on resisted extension of the wrist.
- Patients with symptoms lasting longer than 3 months
- with average pain in the previous week detected as 3 or above on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS)
- who were aged over 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- pain in the proximal part of the affected extremity (e.g. shoulder pain, neck pain)
- abnormal neurogenic symptoms (e.g. radicular pain, numbness) on the affected extremity
- presence of posterior interosseous nerve entrapment
- congenital or acquired upper extremity deformities that might affect grip strength
- systemic musculoskeletal system or neurologic disorders
- systemic rheumatologic disease or systemic infection
- presence of malignancy, coagulation disorders, and anticoagulant use
- inserted cardiac pacemaker
- history of surgical treatment on the elbow of the affected extremity
- pregnancy.
- patients who were administered other treatments such as physical therapy or steroid injections in the last 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: rESWT
the group receiving rESWT
|
rESWT was administered once per week for 3 weeks using a ShockMaster 500 device with 1.8 bar pneumatic pressure, 10 Hz frequency, with 2000 pulses.
|
|
Active Comparator: supervised exercises
the group receiving supervised exercises
|
A program including post-isometric relaxation, and progressive resistance exercise (eccentric wrist extension) on the wrist extensors
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
The Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation is a specific questionnaire designed for the evaluation of the disease-specific pain and function/disability in LE.
The scores were calculated separately and as the total PRTEE score, where 0 represented the best score, and 100 represented the worst score.
The PRTEE consists of a pain scale with 5 items questioning pain during rest and specific activities (0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'the highest pain'), and a function/disability scale with 10 items evaluating difficulties experienced during specific and daily activities (0 represents 'no difficulty' and 10 represents 'the highest difficulty)
|
Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change Visual Analogue Scale score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
The self-evaluation of pain severity during rest and activity in the previous week was calculated using a 10-cm VAS scale
|
Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
|
Change Roles and Maudsley Score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
The Roles and Maudsley score was used to evaluate pain and activity limitation as classified in four categories: 1 point = excellent, "no pain, complete movement, and complete activity;" 2 points = good, "discomfort from time to time, complete movement, and complete activity;" 3 points = fair, "discomfort after long-duration activity;" and 4 points = poor, "pain that restricts activity".
|
Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
|
Change Grip Strength score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
Grip strength of the affected upper extremity was calculated using a Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
|
Change from Baseline at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015/369
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.