Metoclopramide, Azithromycin, or Nondrug Pretreatment for UGIB to Reduce Second Endoscopy (MANPURSE)

August 5, 2020 updated by: Waihong Chung

Metoclopramide, Azithromycin, or Nondrug Pretreatment for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding to Reduce Second Endoscopy

Early endoscopy is an integral part of the management plan for patients presenting with clinical signs of severe or ongoing UGIB. An accurate endoscopic diagnosis and successful endoscopic hemostasis is highly dependent on adequate visualization of the entire gastric mucosa. Metoclopramide has previously been investigated as a prokinetic agent to aid gastric emptying prior to endoscopy, but its widespread adoption is limited by a lack of high quality clinical evidence as well as concerns regarding side effects. Erythromycin is currently the only prokinetic agent recommended by the American and the European guidelines for use in selected patients in order to reduce the need for second endoscopy. Its clinical application, however, is limited by risk of arrhythmia, significant drug interactions, and frequent drug shortages. Azithromycin is structurally related to erythromycin, but is devoid of most adverse side effects associated with erythromycin use. Early evidence suggests that azithromycin may be an effective alternative to erythromycin in the treatment of gastroparesis. The current study, an interventional, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, is primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of azithromycin as a prokinetic agent in the management of UGIB. It is also aimed to further evaluate the role of metoclopramide as a prokinetic agent in this setting. Outcome measures to be collected in this study include the need for secondary endoscopy, overall mortality, transfusion requirement, length of stay, requirement for surgery, and incidence of adverse side effects. Results from this study would help identify a safe, effective, and readily available prokinetic agent to be used prior to endoscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
435

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • Recruiting
        • Rhode Island Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Waihong Chung, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age at the time of presentation;
  • 2. Admitted to Rhode Island Hospital (RIH) emergency room or inpatient services;
  • 3. Presented with hematemesis, coffee ground emesis, or melena;
  • 4. Upper endoscopy is planned within 24 hours of presentation or onset of bleeding.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Known anaphylactic allergic reaction to erythromycin, azithromycin, and/or metoclopramide;
  • 2. Concurrent use of certain medications associated with tardive dyskinesia (TD):
  • a. Fluphenazine,
  • b. Haloperidol,
  • c. Loxapine,
  • d. Paliperidone,
  • e. Perphenazine,
  • f. Pimozide,
  • g. Risperidone,
  • h. Thiothixene,
  • i. Trifluoperazine;
  • 3. Concurrent use of certain medications associated with torsade de pointes:
  • a. Amiodarone,
  • b. Chlorpromazine,
  • c. Disopyramide,
  • d. Dofetilide,
  • e. Methadone,
  • f. Procainamide,
  • g. Quinidine,
  • h. Sotalol;
  • 4. Known history of TD, ventricular arrhythmias , or long QT syndrome;
  • 5. Already received erythromycin and/or azithromycin within the past 10 days, or metoclopramide within the past 4 days for other indications;
  • 6. Recipient of hematopoietic stem cell transplant;
  • 7. History of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection;
  • 8. Pregnancy;
  • 9. Prior gastrectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Azithromycin
Participants randomized to the azithromycin arm would receive 250mL of reconstituted solution containing 500mg of generic azithromycin to be administered as a slow intravenous infusion over 1 hour by the primary team 30-120 minutes prior to endoscopy. No dosage adjustment is made for those with hepatic or renal impairment. No dose adjustment is made for geriatric population.
Drug: Azithromycin Injection
Azithromycin, a semi-synthetic macrolide antibiotic derived from erythromycin. The role of azithromycin as a prokinetic agent was first reported in a retrospective cohort study, which showed azithromycin to be equivalent to erythromycin in accelerating gastric emptying in patients with gastroparesis. The aim of this intervention arm is to evaluate the effectiveness of azithromycin as a prokinetic agent in the management of UGIB.
Experimental: Metoclopramide
Participants randomized to the metoclopramide arm would receive 2mL of solution containing 10mg of generic metoclopramide to be administered as a direct intravenous push by the primary team 5-60 minutes prior to endoscopy. No dosage adjustment is made for those with hepatic impairment. A 50% dose reduction is made for those with creatinine clearance of less than 40mL/minute. No dose adjustment is made for geriatric population.
Drug: Metoclopramide Injectable Solution
Metoclopramide, a 5-HT4 agonist and a dopamine D2-receptor antagonist, is approved for short-term treatment of gastroparesis. The use of metoclopramide as a prokinetic agent in the setting of UGIB has been previously studied, but the number of subject involved was too low to adequately power the studies. The aim of this intervention arm is to further evaluate the effectiveness of metoclopramide as a prokinetic agent in the management of UGIB.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants randomized to the placebo arm during Part 1 (azithromycin) of the study would receive 250mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution to be administered as a slow intravenous infusion over 1 hour by the primary team 30-120 minutes prior to endoscopy. Participants randomized to the placebo arm during Part 2 (metoclopramide) of the current study would receive 2mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution to be administered as a direct intravenous push by the primary team 5-60 minutes prior to endoscopy.
Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9%
Normal saline is used as a placebo control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Reduction in the Need for Second Endoscopy
Time Frame: 48 hours
The primary outcome measure of effectiveness is a reduction in the need for second endoscopy within 48 hours of the first endoscopy. This primary outcome measure is chosen because it represents the basis of current American and European guideline recommendations regarding erythromycin.
48 hours
Adverse Cardiac Side Effects related to Intervention
Time Frame: 5 days
The primary cardiac outcome measure is the incidence of unstable arrhythmia, occurring within 5 days of azithromycin administration, requiring cardioversion or resulting in cardiac arrest.
5 days
Adverse Infectious Disease Side Effects related to Intervention
Time Frame: 30 days
The primary infectious disease outcome measure is the incidence of C. difficile infection, occurring within 30 days of azithromycin administration.
30 days
Adverse Neurological Side Effects related to Intervention
Time Frame: 48 hours
The primary neurological outcome measure is the incidence of any reversible or irreversible extrapyramidal symptom, such as acute dystonic reactions, akathisia, drug-induced Parkinsonism, and tardive dyskinesia, within 48 hours of metoclopramide administration.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Endoscopic Visualization
Time Frame: 48 hours
Endoscopic visibility is graded using the standard 4-point objective scoring system as described in most endoscopy literature. The corpus, fundus, and duodenal bulb are scored separately based on an independent review of the images captured by the endoscopist. If a second endoscopy is performed within 48 hours of the initial endoscopy, the presence of clinically significant lesions not identified during the first endoscopy is also measured.
48 hours
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days.
All-Cause Mortality within 30 days.
30 days.
Number of Unit of Transfusion
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of units of packed red blood cells transfused before hemostasis has been achieved or death.
30 days
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 30 days
Length of hospital stay since admission for current episode of GIB.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Waihong Chung

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1 (Mobile Health and Wellness Program)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings