The Therapeutic Effect of the Hand Robot on Stroke Patients Upper-lime Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
The Therapeutic Effect of the Rehabotics Medical Technology Corporation (RMTC) Finger-hand Robot on Upper-limb Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Taoyuan
-
Taoyuan City, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Taoyuan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS≦2
- Brunnstrom Recovery Stage of Arm≧2
- Mini-Mental State Examination; MMSE≧24
- aged from 20-90 years
- first stroke ≧1 month
Exclusion Criteria:
- poor cognitive ability (such as moderate to severe dementia, etc.) or mental illness (such as convulsions)
- wrist musculoskeletal system disease (such as fractures, tendon rupture, etc.) can not withstand external forces
- skin disorders (such as pressure sores, trauma, cellulitis, etc.)
- cerebellar stroke
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Group
Experimental group received Robot Assisted Training (RMTC finger-hand robot (Mirror Hand)) and traditional occupation therapy (Conventional OT) for 1 hour and forty minutes.
|
The robotic hand will apply on the patient's affected hand and the sensor glove will apply on the patient's un-affected hand, the patient can manipulate their affected hand by their un-affected hand and do the task oriented bimanual training.
The focus of occupational therapy is to help individuals achieve health, well-being, and participation in life through engagement in activities (American Occupational Therapy Association [AOTA], 2014).
For stroke rehabilitation, occupational therapy includes retraining in self-care skills, addressing ongoing deficits such as weakness, sensory loss, and cognitive impairments that limit engagement in activities of daily living, and training in community reintegration and modifying tasks or environments.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
Control group received traditional occupation therapy (Conventional OT) for 1 hour and forty minutes.
|
The focus of occupational therapy is to help individuals achieve health, well-being, and participation in life through engagement in activities (American Occupational Therapy Association [AOTA], 2014).
For stroke rehabilitation, occupational therapy includes retraining in self-care skills, addressing ongoing deficits such as weakness, sensory loss, and cognitive impairments that limit engagement in activities of daily living, and training in community reintegration and modifying tasks or environments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-Upper limb)
Time Frame: Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
Fugl-Meyer assessment is an stroke specific index for estimating the performance of motor function, Total scores of FMA-Upper limb ranged from 0-66.
|
Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
The MAS is an index for estimating the muscle spasticity, minimal is MAS=0 and maximal is MAS=4.
|
Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
|
Change of Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
The ARAT is a measurement for evaluating the alteration of upper limb's motor function.
Total scores of ARAT ranged from 0-57.
|
Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
|
Change of Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (BRS)
Time Frame: Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
The BRS is a measurement tool for estimating the motor recovery consist of 6 sequential stages.
|
Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
|
Change of Box & Block Test (BBT)
Time Frame: Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
The BBT is a measurement for test the unilateral gross manual dexterity.
The number of blocks transferred from one compartment of a box to another in 1-minute is counted.
|
Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
|
Change of Motor Activity Log (MAL)
Time Frame: Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
The MAL is obtained by an interview for stroke patients to assess the use of their affected limb in the daily life, scaled from 0-5.
|
Measurement will be performed at pre-treatment (0 months), treatment completion (post-treatment, an average of 4 weeks), 1 and 3 months (follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483-92. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001. No abstract available.
- Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
- Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386.
- Fugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1980;7:85-93. No abstract available.
- CARROLL D. A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION. J Chronic Dis. 1965 May;18:479-91. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90030-5. No abstract available.
- Crow JL, Lincoln NB, Nouri FM, De Weerdt W. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1989 Oct-Dec;11(4):155-60. doi: 10.3109/03790798909166667.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201800703A3C601
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.