A Real-Time Magnetic Device Prototype for Temporary Management of Paralytic Lagophthalmos
A Real-Time Magnetic Device Prototype for Management of Paralytic Lagophthalmos
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 82445
- E-Da Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with unilateral lagophthalmos; they are capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements
- Aged 18 years old or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- Upper eyelid scar, contracture, fibrosis, and atrophy due to previous surgical intervention(s)
- Patients with psychiatric (or mental) disorders; they are unable to cooperate or follow the study procedure
- Children younger than 18 years of age
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Determine device feasibility
by evaluating efficacy and safety of the device prototype. Test the device one time (duration: 60-120 mins/each time) and second time within 12 months. Intervention: using the magnetic device prototype |
The device prototype comprises a near-infrared light-emitting diode (SMT910, Epitex Inc, Kyoto, Japan) and receiver (PD15-22C TR8, Everlight Electronics Corporation, New Taipei City, Taiwan), a permanent electromagnetic actuator (JNP-12/12, Joint Magnetic Technology Corporation, Shenzhen, China), an iron sheet affixed to the paralytic upper eyelid, and a bio-signal acquisition module.
The efficacy and safety of the device prototype was assessed using the device prototype.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in palpebral gap from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the testing
|
The investigators assess changes in distance between the upper and lower eyelid margins at the axis of the pupil (palpebral gap, millimeter) before and during the intervention by a ruler and/or a software.
|
10 minutes after completion of the testing
|
|
Changes in visual acuity (blurred vision) from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the testing
|
Assess visual acuity by Snellen test before and after the intervention.
|
10 minutes after completion of the testing
|
|
Discomfort of the eyeball and condition of the upper eyelid and facial skin based on a dichotomous Likert scale.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the testing
|
The investigator assess discomfort of the eyeball, and examine erythema or swelling over upper eyelid and facial skin after the intervention.
(The score 0 indicating no discomfort, score 1 indicating positive discomfort)
|
10 minutes after completion of the testing
|
|
Changes in palpebral gap from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
|
The investigators assess changes in distance between the upper and lower eyelid margins at the axis of the pupil (palpebral gap, millimeter) before and during the intervention by a ruler and/or a software.
|
10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
|
|
Changes in visual acuity (blurred vision) from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
|
Assess visual acuity by Snellen test before and after the intervention.
|
10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
|
|
Discomfort of the eyeball and degree of the upper eyelid and facial skin based on a 3-point Likert scale.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
|
The investigator assess discomfort of the eyeball, and examine erythema or swelling over upper eyelid and facial skin after the intervention.
The scale ranges from 1 to 3, with score 1 indicating no discomfort at all, score 2 moderate discomfort, and score 3 extremely discomfort.
|
10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Yuan-Kun Tu, MD, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EMRP33106N
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.