A Real-Time Magnetic Device Prototype for Temporary Management of Paralytic Lagophthalmos

August 9, 2025 updated by: Lien, Ching-Feng, E-DA Hospital

A Real-Time Magnetic Device Prototype for Management of Paralytic Lagophthalmos

To develop a real-time wearable device based on the principle of magnetic force for temporary management of lagophthalmos, and evaluate its efficacy and safety, including synchronous blinks and eye closure, blurred vision, foreign body sensation over cornea or eyeball, burning or hot sensation over facial skin, and erythema or pruritus over eyelid, by performing a human trial on patients with lagophthalmos.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The wearable system includes a near-infrared (NIR) light-emitting diode (SMT910, Epitex Inc, Kyoto, Japan) and receiver (PD15-22C TR8, Everlight Electronics Corporation, New Taipei City, Taiwan), a permanent electromagnetic actuator (JNP-12/12, Joint Magnetic Technology Corporation, Shenzhen, China), an iron sheet affixed to the paralytic upper eyelid, and a bio-signal acquisition module together with a power supply unit providing a wired connection to the NIR sensor and permanent electromagnetic actuator. The palpebral gap was measured before and after the wearing of the device. The efficacy of the device prototype was assessed in terms of synchronous blinks and eye closure. Subjective sensation and complications were assessed by blurred vision, foreign body sensation over cornea or eyeball, burning or hot sensation over facial skin, and erythema or pruritus over eyelid. After the completion of the study procedure, eyelid skin condition was examined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 82445
        • E-DA Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with unilateral lagophthalmos; they are capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements
  • Aged 18 years old or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upper eyelid scar, contracture, fibrosis, and atrophy due to previous surgical intervention(s)
  • Patients with psychiatric (or mental) disorders; they are unable to cooperate or follow the study procedure
  • Children younger than 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Determine device feasibility

by evaluating efficacy and safety of the device prototype. Test the device one time (duration: 60-120 mins/each time) and second time within 12 months.

Intervention: using the magnetic device prototype

The device prototype comprises a near-infrared light-emitting diode (SMT910, Epitex Inc, Kyoto, Japan) and receiver (PD15-22C TR8, Everlight Electronics Corporation, New Taipei City, Taiwan), a permanent electromagnetic actuator (JNP-12/12, Joint Magnetic Technology Corporation, Shenzhen, China), an iron sheet affixed to the paralytic upper eyelid, and a bio-signal acquisition module. The efficacy and safety of the device prototype was assessed using the device prototype.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in palpebral gap from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the testing
The investigators assess changes in distance between the upper and lower eyelid margins at the axis of the pupil (palpebral gap, millimeter) before and during the intervention by a ruler and/or a software.
10 minutes after completion of the testing
Changes in visual acuity (blurred vision) from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the testing
Assess visual acuity by Snellen test before and after the intervention.
10 minutes after completion of the testing
Discomfort of the eyeball and condition of the upper eyelid and facial skin based on a dichotomous Likert scale.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the testing
The investigator assess discomfort of the eyeball, and examine erythema or swelling over upper eyelid and facial skin after the intervention. (The score 0 indicating no discomfort, score 1 indicating positive discomfort)
10 minutes after completion of the testing
Changes in palpebral gap from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
The investigators assess changes in distance between the upper and lower eyelid margins at the axis of the pupil (palpebral gap, millimeter) before and during the intervention by a ruler and/or a software.
10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
Changes in visual acuity (blurred vision) from the baseline.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
Assess visual acuity by Snellen test before and after the intervention.
10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
Discomfort of the eyeball and degree of the upper eyelid and facial skin based on a 3-point Likert scale.
Time Frame: 10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months
The investigator assess discomfort of the eyeball, and examine erythema or swelling over upper eyelid and facial skin after the intervention. The scale ranges from 1 to 3, with score 1 indicating no discomfort at all, score 2 moderate discomfort, and score 3 extremely discomfort.
10 minutes after completion of the second testing within 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yuan-Kun Tu, MD, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paralytic Lagophthalmos

Clinical Trials on Magnetic device prototype

Subscribe